Psychotronic Systems Information Consultant

Psychotronic Systems Information Consultant Psy-Ops

01/10/2025
25/09/2025
អត្ថបទយោបល់ហេតុអ្វីកម្ពុជាត្រូវបង្កើតការពារដោយដ្រូន—បទពិសោធអ៊ុយក្រែនផ្លាស់ប្ដូរសមរភូមិសម័យថ្មីដោយ Rocco Rodriguezក្នុងរយ...
24/09/2025

អត្ថបទយោបល់

ហេតុអ្វីកម្ពុជាត្រូវបង្កើតការពារដោយដ្រូន—បទពិសោធអ៊ុយក្រែនផ្លាស់ប្ដូរសមរភូមិសម័យថ្មី

ដោយ Rocco Rodriguez

ក្នុងរយៈពេលបីឆ្នាំ អ៊ុយក្រែន—ដែលខ្វះអាវុធ ខ្វះថវិកា និងខ្វះមនុស្ស—បានធ្វើឲ្យខូចប៉ះពាល់ធ្ងន់ធ្ងរដល់កងទ័ពសមុទ្ររុស្ស៊ី វាយបំផ្លាញរោងចក្រប្រេង ១០% នៅរុស្ស៊ី និងផ្ដាច់យន្តហោះចម្បាំងយុទ្ធសាស្រ្តនៅចម្ងាយ ១.២០០ គ.ម ខាងក្នុងទឹកដីរុស្ស៊ី។ អាវុធសំងាត់មិនមែនជាយន្តហោះលាក់អណ្ដាញ ឬផ្កាយរណបពាន់លានដុល្លារទេ គឺដ្រូនប្លាស្ទិច ៤០០ដុល្លារដែលអាចទិញបានលើអាលីបាបា ប្រើគ្រាប់បែកតូចនិងបើកដោយយុវជនអាយុ ១៩ឆ្នាំបានហ្វឹកហាត់តែ ២សប្ដាហ៍។ កម្ពុជាគួរចាប់ផ្ដើមចងចាំ។

លេខថ្មីនៃសង្គ្រាម
សៀវភៅចុងក្រោយពីគៀវ៖
- ដ្រូន ៦០០ដុល្លារអាចវាយខូចយន្តហោះ Tu-95 តម្លៃ ២៥០លានដុល្លារ។
- ដ្រូនសមុទ្រ ៣០០.០០០ដុល្លារបានផ្ដាច់ Su-30 តម្លៃ ៥០លានដុល្លារ។
- យប់តែមួយ ១មិថុនា ២០២៥ ដ្រូន ១១៧គ្រឿងតម្លៃក្រោម ៥.០០០ដុល្លារក្នុងមួយគ្រឿងបំផ្លាញយន្តហោះ ៤១គ្រឿងតម្លៃ ៧ពាន់លានដុល្លារ ចំណាយផលប្ដូរ ១២.០០០៖១។

ទិន្នន័យនេះមិនមែនជាផ្សព្វផ្សាយទេ។ ដ្រូនឥឡូវបង្កជាការខូចប្រដាប់ ៦០-៧០% ហើយពង្រីកតំបន់ស្លាប់ដល់ ៩ម៉ាយក្រោយបន្ទាត់មុខ។ ការឆ្លើយតបរបស់មូស្គូ—មីស៊ីល ៣លានដុល្លារ—�្វើឲ្យអ្នកបាញ់ខ្ចាត់ខ្ចាយមុនគោលដៅ។

ហេតុផលសម្រាប់កម្ពុជា
ថវិកាការពារជាតិថៃធំជាងកម្ពុជា ១៣ដង មាន F-16 នាវាមុជទឹក និងទាហាន ៣០ម៉ឺននាក់។ កម្ពុជាមិនអាចប្រណាំង—និងមិនចាំបាច់។ ឥឡូវការទប់ទល់មិនស្មើគ្នានៅលើធ្នើលក់។

ស្ដែងចិត្តគំនិត “សំបុកខ្មែរ” តាមជួរភ្នំដងរែក៖
- ដ្រូន FPV ៥.០០០គ្រឿង (@ ៥០០ដុល្លារ) = ២,៥លានដុល្លារ តម្លៃគ្រាប់មួយគ្រាប់ពីកាំជ្រួច ២លានដុល្លារ។
- អាល់ករីស្វាំងរកឃើញ និងវាយគ្រប់កម្លាំងដែលប្រមូលនៅខាងត្បូងព្រះវិហារ។
- មីស៊ីលថៃឆ្លើយតប ១០០ដងថ្លៃដ្រូន—ចំណាយអស់ធនធាន មិនសម្លាប់ទាហានខ្មែរម្នាក់។

ផលប្រយោជន៍ពីរជាមួយគ្នា
អ៊ុយក្រែនបង្ហាញថាដ្រូនផលិតនៅគៀវឥឡូវថតភ្លើង បាញ់ស្រូវ និងដឹកឈាម។ កម្ពុជាអាចចម្លង៖
- រដូវក្ដៅ៖ ប្រមូលទិន្នន័យ ៣០នាទីរកចំណុចឆេះ ១ម៉ែត្រ សង្គ្រោះឈើរាប់លានដុល្លារ។
- រដូវទឹកជំនន់៖ រូបភាពពីដ្រូនទៅអភិបាល ៣ម៉ោង មិន ៤៨—ជីវិតឬស្លាប់។
- កសិកម្ម៖ ឧទ្ធម្ភាគចក្របាញ់ថ្នាំ ៨គ.ក ៤ហិកតារ/ម៉ោង ថោកជាងកម្មករ ៣ដង។

ប៉ុស្តិ៍ដ្រូនជាតិមួយក្រោម RCAF ប៉ុន្តែបើកឲ្យក្រសួងកសិកម្ម និងគ្រោះមហន្តរាយ—ធ្វើឲ្យថវិកាការពារជាតិទទួលបានសំឡេងគាំទ្រពីប្រជាជន។

ល្បឿនបង្កើត
គៀវពី ២០.០០០ទៅ ៤,៥លានដ្រូនក្នុង ៣៦ខែ បង្កើតក្រុមហ៊ុន ៥០០+ និងបណ្ដុះបណ្ដាលអ្នកបើក ១០០.០០០នាក់។ ពួកគេឥឡូវផលិតផ្នែក ៩៦% នៅក្នុងស្រុក។ ប៊ុយរ៉ូក្រាស៊ីតូចជាង អាចប្រើម៉ាស៊ីនបោះពុម្ព ៣D សាកលវិទ្យាល័យ និងកូដប្រភពបើកដែលមានរួចហើយនៅភ្នំពេញ។ ឧបសគ្គមិនមែនបច្ចេកវិទ្យា គឺចិត្តនិងភាពបន្ទាន់។

ចំណាត់ថ្កោល
“នឹងកើនកងទ័ពធំ” មិនចាំបាច់។ ដ្រូនថោកប្រែព្រៃជាបន្ទាយ ប្រែយុវជនជាអ្នកបច្ចេកវិទ្យាការពារជាតិ ប្រែភូមិជាទីបញ្ចុះបញ្ចាក់។

ឧបករណ៍តូចអាចរក្សាប្រាសាទព្រះវិហារ និងវាលស្រូវរបស់លោកអ្នកដូចគ្នា។

ប្រទេសតូច ថវិកាតិច តែឆន្ទៈមិនចុះថោក!

OP-ED

Why Cambodia Must Embrace Drone Defense—Lessons from Ukraine’s David-vs-Goliath Victory

By Rocco Rodriguez

In the span of three years, Ukraine—out-gunned, out-spent and out-manned—has crippled a super-power’s Black Sea Fleet, knocked out 10 per cent of Russia’s oil-refining capacity and destroyed strategic bombers 1,200 km inside Russian territory. The secret is not stealth fighters or billion-dollar satellites. It is the 400 plastic drone you can buy on Alibaba, welded to a warhead and flown by a 19-year-old with two weeks’ training. Cambodia should be taking notes.

The New Arithmetic of War
Kyiv’s ledger is startling:
- A 600 first-person-view (FPV) drone can gut a 250 million Tu-95 bomber .
- A 300,000 sea drone has downed 50 million Su-30 jets .
- In a single night—1 June 2025—117 Ukrainian drones costing under 5,000 each wrecked 41 Russian aircraft worth 7 billion, a cost-exchange ratio of 1:12,000 .

These are not one-off propaganda stunts. Drones now inflict 60–70 per cent of all Russian equipment losses and have extended the lethal “kill zone” to nine miles behind the front . Moscow’s answer—3 million surface-to-air missiles—bankrupts the shooter long before the target.

Why This Matters for Cambodia
Thailand’s defence budget is 13 times larger than Phnom Penh’s. It fields F-16s, an aircraft-carrier-in-all-but-name and 300,000 active troops. Cambodia cannot match that—and doesn’t have to. Asymmetric deterrence is now on the shelf, boxed and bar-coded.

Imagine a “Khmer Hive” along the Dangrek escarpment:
- 5,000 jungle-launched FPV drones (@ 500) = 2.5 million, the price of one Thai main-battle-tank round fired by a 2 million gun.
- Swarm algorithms spot, fix and strike anything that masses on our side of Preah Vihear.
- Every Thai missile fired back costs 100-times the drone it kills—fiscal exhaustion without a single Cambodian life risked.

Dual-Use Dividend
Ukraine’s lesson is bigger than the battlefield. Drones designed in Kyiv now map wildfires, spray wheat and deliver blood packs. Cambodia can copy-paste:
- Fire season: 30-minute drone sorties detect ignition points 1 m wide, saving millions in timber and carbon credits.
- Flood season: UAV orthophotos delivered to governors in three hours, not 48—life or death when the Tonlé Sap rises.
- Farming: Eight-rotor rigs cut pesticide cost by two-thirds, keeping rice profits in village pockets.

One national “drone motor-pool” under the RCAF but available to MAFF and NCDM turns defence procurement into rural development—and wins taxpayer consent.

Institutional Speed
Ukraine went from 20,000 to 4.5 million drones a year in 36 months, creating 500+ firms and graduating 100,000 pilots . It achieved 96 % component sovereignty after starting with Chinese toy parts. Cambodia’s smaller bureaucracy can move faster: university 3-D printers, provincial tech incubators and open-source flight code already exist in Phnom Penh hackerspaces. The bottleneck is not technology; it is imagination—and urgency.

Counter-Arguments & Rebuttals
“Drones provoke escalation.”

They also raise the cost of invasion so high that escalation becomes irrational. Russia’s Black Sea flagship is now a submarine because Moscow underestimated cheap robots .

“Thailand will buy counter-drone lasers.”

Good—every 1 million C-UAS system bought is one fewer helicopter upgraded. Cost-punishment works both ways.

“We rely on imported chips.”

Start with import dependence; end with local assembly. Ukraine did it under fire; Cambodia can do it in peace.

Conclusion – A Smarter Army, Not a Bigger One
Ukraine has proven that determination plus circuitry can stalemate a nuclear power. Cambodia does not need aircraft carriers; it needs PVC launch tubes in the Kulen hills, 500 drones in school backpacks and farmers who double as part-time sensor operators.

The temple of Preah Vihear was once defended by stone walls and diplomacy. Tomorrow it can be ring-fenced by an invisible cloud of quadcopters that see farther, shoot straighter and cost less than the first round of artillery aimed at them.

Small country, small budget—unmatched deterrence. The lesson from Kyiv is clear: build the hive before the tanks roll.

: Lowy Institute, 2025-06-05

: POLITICO, 2025-08-27

: Second Line of Defense, 2025-06-18

: ICWA, 2025-07-09

24/09/2025
29/08/2025
23/08/2025

Bill Murray showed up on the set of "Where the Buffalo Roam" (1980) already deep into his portrayal of Hunter S. Thompson. He had spent weeks drinking Wild Turkey, chain-smoking Dunhills, and mimicking Thompson’s raspy slur until it almost overtook his own personality. It was not preparation for a role. It was immersion. He lived at Thompson’s Owl Farm in Colorado, sharing whiskey-fueled nights, shooting guns, and listening to Gonzo monologues that never seemed to end. By the time filming began, the boundary between actor and subject had blurred to a dangerous degree.

Murray later recalled in interviews that becoming Hunter was not easy to undo. During and after the shoot, he found it difficult to shake the persona. Friends noticed the change immediately. Even in casual conversations, his voice dipped into Thompson’s cadences, and his behavior mirrored the eccentric journalist's chaotic energy. Murray admitted that he did not break free from that mindset until after the wrap, and even then, it haunted him longer than he expected. The experience was both intoxicating and unnerving.

"Where the Buffalo Roam" (1980) fictionalized Thompson’s escapades through the lens of his alter ego Raoul Duke and his attorney, the wild and unpredictable Carl Lazlo, portrayed by Peter Boyle. The film’s tone oscillated between absurdity and manic intensity, much like Thompson’s real life. One of the most memorable scenes shows Murray’s Thompson barging through a hotel room with a briefcase full of narcotics, a bottle of bourbon in one hand, and a typewriter strapped to his back. The chaos intensifies as he bellows about Nixon, the DEA, and the decay of American journalism, all while trying to cover a story he never intends to write.

That scene was pure Gonzo theater, and it captured something no other film had dared at that time, the disorienting swirl of drugs, politics, and paranoia that defined Thompson’s work. Murray’s delivery was unfiltered, sweaty, and uncomfortably real. The film’s director, Art Linson, later said that Murray’s performance was so committed it often became difficult to separate acting from reality. At one point, during a break in filming, Murray wandered off set and fired a shotgun into the air, claiming it was what “Hunter would do on deadline.”

Behind the scenes, the film's production was as turbulent as the story it tried to tell. Linson clashed with Universal executives who didn’t understand the tone. The script changed constantly, and Thompson himself was unimpressed with the final product. He once said the film made him look like a “cartoon character,” although he remained fond of Murray’s performance. The two had bonded deeply during pre-production, once engaging in a wrestling match that ended with Thompson tying Murray to a chair and throwing him into a pool.

Despite the rocky critical reception, the film made a mark. It introduced mainstream audiences to a character who would later be portrayed again, most famously by Johnny Depp in "Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas." But Murray’s version, raw and drenched in anarchic energy, holds a unique place in pop culture. It was less polished but more dangerous. It did not aim to please. It aimed to replicate the chaos of a man who never cared for rules.

For Murray, the impact lingered. It was one of the earliest roles that showed his range beyond comedy. In taking on Thompson, he explored the edge of madness, truth, and impersonation in a way that few actors dared in 1980. It was a performance that nearly consumed him but also proved his fearless dedication.

Murray did not play Hunter S. Thompson. He briefly became him.

19/08/2025

Address

Soi 4 Pratamnak
Guangzhou

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Psychotronic Systems Information Consultant posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Psychotronic Systems Information Consultant:

Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest Share on Reddit Share via Email
Share on WhatsApp Share on Instagram Share on Telegram