Naturnær Menneskelig Udviklingsteori

Naturnær Menneskelig Udviklingsteori "Naturnær Menneskelig Udviklingsteori" repræsenterer en naturfokuseret og kulturkritisk tilgang til fysisk sygdom og psykisk mistrivsel.

Der er tale om en ikke-patologiserende tilgang, der betragter menneskelige adfærd og tilstande som reaktion/adaptation Psykolog, Ronnie Kristensen. Udvikler af Naturnær Menneskelig Udviklingsteori
www.stressvedborn.dk
www.psykologholstebro.dk

Landsdækkende og sektoruafhængigt Er du psykolog, socialrådgiver, jurist, læge, sygeplejerske, socialformidler, fysioter...
13/11/2025

Landsdækkende og sektoruafhængigt

Er du psykolog, socialrådgiver, jurist, læge, sygeplejerske, socialformidler, fysioterapeut, psykiatrimedarbejder, jobcenteransat, forvaltningskonsulent — eller på anden måde en fagperson, der arbejder i eller omkring den offentlige sektor?

Center for Naturnær Menneskelig Udvikling etablerer nu et landsdækkende tværfagligt team, som skal fungere som fagligt sparringsrum, analysegruppe og støtte for fagprofessionelle i alle dele af landet.

Det gælder ikke kun børn- og ungeområdet.
Det gælder socialområdet, sundhedsområdet, psykiatrien, jobcentrene, handicapområdet, ældreområdet — alle steder hvor borgere oplever:
• systemisk afmagt
• manglende helhedsblik
• retssikkerhedsbrud
• manglende koordinering
• uforståelige afgørelser
• organisatorisk modstand mod faglige input
• brudte forløb, tabte borgere og tabt tillid

Vi søger fagpersoner, der har lyst til at være med til at:
🌿 skabe tværfaglig sparring for andre fagpersoner i hele landet
🌿 hjælpe med at forstå komplekse sager holistisk og professionelt
🌿 udvikle en ny form for nationalt fagligt modspil
🌿 analysere systemiske mønstre på tværs af sektorer
🌿 opbygge et fremtidigt konsulentberedskab, som kommuner og regioner kan trække på

I opstarten er teamet frivilligt — senere bliver det et professionelt konsulent- og analysekorps.
Hvis du sidder med en sag, eller hvis du vil være en del af teamet, kontakt Psykolog, Ronnie Kristensen:
Tlf.: +45 52585274
Mail.: info@psykologholstebro.dk
www.naturnærudvikling.dk

Sammen kan vi skabe et tværfagligt fællesskab, der løfter faglighed, etik og menneskelig værdighed på tværs af Danmark.

21/10/2025
Lille-verden – refleksioner omkring selvoscillation, resonans og menneskelig udviklingAf Ronnie Kristensen, psykolog, Ce...
11/09/2025

Lille-verden – refleksioner omkring selvoscillation, resonans og menneskelig udvikling

Af Ronnie Kristensen, psykolog, Center for Naturnær Menneskelig Udvikling, chefpsykolog ved Nordisk Krisekorps og udvikler af Naturnær Menneskelig Udviklingsteori



Indledning – når verden bliver for stor

I min kommende bog om Naturnær Menneskelig Udviklingsteori introducerer jeg begrebet lilleverden. Jeg bruger det til at forstå de tilstande, vi i årtier har haft for vane at sygeliggøre og reducere til diagnoser. OCD, tvangshandlinger, autistiske særinteresser, selvskade eller spiseforstyrrelser bliver i et medicinsk paradigme set som symptomer. Jeg ser dem anderledes: som naturlige, rytmiske strategier – små verdener, mennesket søger ind i, når omgivelserne ikke længere bærer.

Når vi ikke mødes resonant – når vi ikke spejles, anerkendes og understøttes på de mange sider, træk, behov, egenskaber og funktioner, vi rummer – skabes der et tomrum. Organismen vil altid forsøge at lukke dette tomrum. Her opstår selvoscillation: kroppens evne til selv at skabe gentagende mønstre, handlinger eller tanker, som giver en fornemmelse af rytme og orden.

Lille-verden er netop dette: et selvorganiserende rum, hvor vi søger resonans, når resonansfeltet omkring os bryder sammen.



Mennesket som mosaik af behov, sider og funktioner

Jeg foreslår eksempelvis at betragte mennesket som en mosaik af behov, sider, træk, funktioner og egenskaber. Forestil dig en stor mosaikvæg, sammensat af tusindvis af brikker i forskellige former, farver og materialer. Nogle er stærke og lysende, andre skrøbelige og næsten gennemsigtige. Hver brik repræsenterer et aspekt af os: en biologisk rytme, en kropslig funktion, et sanseligt behov, en psykologisk egenskab, et emotionelt træk, et socialt relationelt behov.

Denne forståelse hænger tæt sammen med Maturana & Varelas teori om struktur-determination: En organisme kan kun reagere og udvikle sig ud fra sine egne strukturelle muligheder. Mosaikken er netop et billede på dette – mennesket kan kun folde sig ud, når alle brikker mødes resonant, og når omgivelserne ikke skærer dele væk.

Når mosaikken mødes resonant – når omgivelserne spejler og bærer os i vores behov, sider og træk – træder helheden frem som et levende billede. Når vi ikke mødes, ser vi afvikling: sider og træk falmer og træder i baggrunden, egenskaber og funktioner afvikles.

Her kan vi tale om kulturelt betinget dissociation. I en kultur, hvor bestemte behov eller egenskaber ikke anerkendes – fx menneskets sanselige, rytmiske eller relationelle sider – skubbes disse dele af mosaikken ud i periferien. De forsvinder ikke, men de bliver tavse, undertrykte og ofte stigmatiserede.



Lilleverden som rytmisk strategi

Når mosaikken - den menneskelige organisme ikke mødes resonant, vil organismen kompensere. Det gør den gennem lilleverden.

Lilleverden er en rytmisk strategi – et rum, hvor organismen gennem selvoscillation forsøger at skabe resonans indefra, når den ikke findes udefra. Her kan vi igen trække på Anokhins teori om funktionelle systemer: Organismen organiserer altid sine handlinger ud fra at skabe en form for regulering og overlevelse. Lilleverden er netop et funktionelt system – et midlertidigt mønster, der holder organismen sammen, når resonansen i det større felt er brudt.

Samtidig kan vi forstå fænomenet gennem Porges’ polyvagale teori: Når vi ikke mødes resonant i sociale relationer, glider nervesystemet ud af tryghedsregulering og søger selv at skabe rytme. Lilleverden bliver en slags indre “nødspor,” hvor mennesket forsøger at holde sig i live gennem gentagelse og selvorganisering.



Kliniske cases – tre livsfaser af lilleverden

Barnet med leukemi

Et seksårigt barn indlægges med leukemi. Fra den ene dag til den anden fratages han alle muligheder for at regulere sig på sine helt primære og basale behovsparametre på alle niveauer (biologisk, fysiologisk, psykisk, sanseligt og socialt).
Søvn, appetit, bevægelse, leg og nærhed bliver styret af lægers og behandleres tidsskemaer.

Han sættes i en tilstand af systemisk afmagt, hvor “mosaikken”, hans organisme, ikke mødes rytmisk resonant på relevante behovs-dimensioner. Da han vender hjem efter behandling, begynder han pludselig at udvise stærke OCD-lignende træk. Han vasker hænder igen og igen, tæller mønstre, insisterer på faste rutiner. Det er ikke en ny patologi, men et forsøg på at skabe en lille verden, hvor han oplever resonans. Han skærmer sig fra alt i omverdenen der ligger uden for hans kontrol og som han har erfaret, sætter ham i systemisk afmagt – altså en selvoscillerende strategi, hvor han forsøger at skabe resonans, efter at være blevet berøvet den gennem hele sygdomsforløbet.



Teenagepigen der selvskader

En pige på 13–14 år cykler hjem fra skole og skærer i sin hud. Hun lever i en kultur, hvor skolens krav er for høje, lærernes tilgang er funktionalistisk, og hjemme møder hun forældre, der ikke kan bære hendes følelser. Hun oplever sig konstant målt, men aldrig mødt.

Set gennem Leontjevs virksomhedsteori giver hendes handling mening: Aktiviteten er ikke tilfældig, men en måde at regulere et indre behov i fraværet af resonans. Selvskaden giver en virkning i en virkningsløs verden. Smerten, blodet, rytmen i handlingen – alt sammen skaber en form for resonans, hvor hun for et øjeblik kan mærke sig selv. Samtidigt skærmer smerten hende fra stressbelastningen ved alt det der ligger uden for hendes egen kontrol, altså de forhold der kommer til udtryk i hendes dissociative overtænkning omkring eks.: At vi ødelægger vores klode og natur og krig i ukraine; At hun ikke præsterer som hun måtte ønske i forhold til at blive dyrlæge; At hun ksla sige til hendes veninde at hun ikke kan komme med til hendes fødselsdag, og utrygheden ved, hvordan veninden nu må reagere; At mor og far ikke forstår hende og blot presser endnu mere på i forhold til for præstation og funktionalisering, frem for at støtte op om nødvendig ro til restitution samt trivsel i hendes tilværelse.



Den voksne, der arbejder sig ihjel

En mand i 40’erne arbejder 70 timer om ugen. Udefra ligner han en succes – indefra er arbejdet blevet en lilleverden.

Her kan vi igen forstå mønsteret gennem Anokhins funktionelle systemer: Arbejdet bliver det system, der organiserer hans liv, fordi det giver rytme, kontrol og en følelse af virkning. Men andre dele af mosaikken – det sanselige, sociale og kropslige – afvikles stille og roligt.

Det, der begyndte som selvregulering, ender som selvdestruktion. Og får han ikke hold på det i tide, ender det i svære belastningsskader på hele hans organisme, på biologiske, fysiske, psykisk, sanseligt og sociale parametre. Dysregulering i alle indre systemer - fordøjelse; søvn, hvile, restitution; respiration; blodtryk, hormonel dysregulering m.fl. Over tid, måske inflammatoriske tilstande som bliver til føleforstyrrelser og nerveskader..nervesmerter. Kognitiv dysfunktion i forhold til koncentration, opmærksomhedsrettethed, strukturering, organisering, rummelighed, m.v. Listen er lang.



Udvikling og afvikling – mosaikkens logik

Når vi forstår mennesket som en mosaik af behov, sider, træk, funktioner og egenskaber, bliver logikken tydelig:
• Udvikling sker, når mosaikkens mange dele mødes resonant. Når vi spejles, understøttes og gives autonomi til at handle i overensstemmelse med vores intuition, nysgerrige rettethed og behovs-regulerende virksomhed.
• Afvikling sker, når mosaikken ikke mødes resonant. Når vi ikke spejles, når vores behov ikke bæres, og vi fratages råderummet til at regulere os selv. Da vil funktioner svækkes, sider og træk træde i baggrunden, og egenskaber gå tabt.

Her hænger mosaik-billedet tæt sammen med Deci & Ryans selvbestemmelsesteori: Autonomi, kompetence og samhørighed er grundlæggende behov, som skal mødes for, at mennesket kan udvikle sig. Hvis de ikke mødes, sker der ikke blot stilstand, men afvikling.



Frekvenser, vibration og resonans

Når jeg taler om rytme og resonans, kan det også forstås i et sprog, der minder om fysikkens: frekvenser og vibration. Mennesket kan beskrives som en organisme i konstant svingning – fra de mindste elektriske impulser i cellerne, til hjertets slag, åndedrættets bevægelser, de hormonelle cykler og de sociale rytmer, vi indgår i.

Ligesom et glas kan begynde at vibrere, når det mødes af lyd på dets egen resonansfrekvens, reagerer vi som organismer, når vi mødes af rytmer og frekvenser, der matcher vores egne indre mønstre. Når vi mødes af harmoniske frekvenser, falder vi til ro. Når vi mødes af støj, rigiditet eller fravær af spejling, falder vi ud af balance og søger kompensation gennem lilleverden og selvoscillation.

Man kan sige, at den menneskelige organisme fungerer som et orkester. Når resonansen med omgivelserne bryder sammen, bliver orkestret ustemt. Lilleverden er den melodi, vi spiller alene, for at holde os selv i live – indtil vi igen kan stemme os ind i den større musik.



Afslutning – resonans frem for kontrol

Jeg ser lilleverden som et afgørende begreb, hvis vi vil forstå menneskelig udvikling. Den er ikke et symptom, men en strategi. Ikke en fejl, men et forsøg på at finde rytme, når verden mister sin.

Når vi møder mennesket som en mosaik – af behov, sider, træk, funktioner og egenskaber – bliver det klart, at udvikling kun sker, når mosaikken mødes resonant. Når vi ikke mødes, følger afvikling. Når vi mødes, opstår udvikling.

Denne refleksion er blot en forsmag. I min kommende bog om Naturnær Menneskelig Udviklingsteori udfolder jeg både begrebet lilleverden og mosaikken som metafor. Her viser jeg, hvordan vi kan bevæge os fra en kultur, der patologiserer, til en kultur, der forstår og understøtter menneskets rytmiske og behovsregulerende natur.

For mig er det et paradigmeskifte: fra kontrol til resonans, fra afvikling til udvikling. Fra et medicinsk/psykiatrisk paradigme baseret på et logisk rationelt og funktionalistisk tilgang til mennesket, og til et naturnært paradigme fokuseret på mennesket som rytmeorganisme med behov for resonans.



Hashtags




Referencer

Anokhin, P. K. (1974). Biology and neurophysiology of the conditioned reflex and its role in adaptive behavior. New York: Pergamon Press.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Press.

Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing.

Porges, S. W. (2011). The polyvagal theory: Neurophysiological foundations of emotions, attachment, communication, and self-regulation. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

The English version of my latest article has been well received by both American readers and Europeans outside Denmark.Y...
18/08/2025

The English version of my latest article has been well received by both American readers and Europeans outside Denmark.
You can find it on my FB-page, Naturnær Menneskelig Udviklingsteori



Feel free to share the article.

Narcissism: Understanding & Transcending It
Warm regards,
Ronnie

WHEN NARCISSISM GAINS POWER – AND THE WELFARE SYSTEM LOSES ITS HUMANITY
A reckoning with the tyranny of self-interest, herd mentality, and leadership culture in our public systems

By Ronnie Kristensen, Psychologist, Center for Nature-Based Human Development, Chief Psychologist at the Nordisk Krisekorps, and developer of Nature-Based Human Development Theory



1. Introduction – What we don’t dare say out loud

We often talk about structural issues. About lack of resources. About complexity. About unintended incidents. But we rarely talk about what I believe to be one of the most serious threats to human well-being in the Danish welfare system: people in positions of power who should never have been there.

I’m talking about professionals, leaders, and decision-makers who are not driven by relational responsibility, sensing, or resonance – but by egocentric, self-serving, and narcissistic self-interest. People who use the system to expand their control, protect their image, and cultivate their position, while making decisions that harm the most vulnerable in society.

This is a critique rarely voiced directly. We’ve built a culture where it’s seen as disloyal to point out when someone uses their authority to promote themselves rather than the community. But if we don’t have the courage to name it, these same individuals will keep climbing the system – leaving behind a trail of insecurity, powerlessness, and systemic violence.

This article is an attempt to break that silence. Not to point fingers blindly – but to direct our attention to where it should have been long ago: toward those who bear responsibility. Toward those who not only lack resonance – but who actively work against it.



2. Hidden power – authorization, decision-making, and the polished exterior

Narcissism in the system rarely shows up as the classically loud, self-aggrandizing figure we read about in psychology textbooks. It’s far more subtle. It hides behind politeness, professional jargon, credentials, and a shiny CV. But beneath the surface, the pattern is often the same: a person who uses others as means to personal ends, and who lacks the capacity to truly feel the consequences of their decisions on others’ bodies.

The most damaging actors in the system are rarely the noisiest. They are the ones who have mastered the language of the system. Those who know how to appear collaborative while shielding themselves from any form of accountability. They call it “strategic leadership.” They call it “difficult priorities.” But in truth, it’s a cold calculation: to use one’s position of power to make decisions without human consequence responsibility.

In Nature-Based Human Development Theory, I describe this as cultural dissociation: a condition where the human disappears behind the role. Where sensing shuts down, and the individual is guided only by external function and internal reward systems. This is where narcissism thrives best – and it is precisely here that we find some of the most influential decision-makers in our welfare system.



3. The tyranny of the herd – when the system protects the wrong people

A system built around collective loyalty and conformity will inevitably start protecting those who best perform this behavior. And that’s exactly why narcissistic and self-centered individuals are allowed to climb the hierarchy. Not because they are the most capable. But because they know how to mirror the system’s self-image and avoid being perceived as a threat to the structure.

Herd mentality plays a critical role. Those in authority surround themselves with others who reflect their worldview. External criticism is met with dismissal or ridicule. People who speak of sensing, relationship, and rhythm are viewed as emotionally driven and unprofessional. And those who dare to stand up to abuse are ostracized as disloyal.

This isn’t just unhealthy. It is downright dangerous. Because it means the system begins to manufacture its own blind spot. No one feels what’s happening anymore. And those who do remain silent – because otherwise, they risk losing their jobs, their colleagues, or their mental health.

In such a culture, the most attuned and ethically anchored professionals are marginalized, while the most tactically savvy – and emotionally disconnected – are rewarded. The result is a system that gradually loses its capacity to be human.


Tak – her kommer resten af oversættelsen:



4. When power becomes more important than people

Narcissistic use of power in the system isn’t always dramatic. Often, it’s everyday acts. A manager manipulating an employee’s self-image to maintain control. A caseworker falsifying a report to cover a mistake. A psychologist tailoring a conclusion to meet an official request because it’s easier. And everyone around them who knows it – but lets it happen.

The most dangerous thing about narcissism in the system isn’t one individual with power. It’s the culture that allows them to remain in power. That avoids asking hard questions because it’s “easier to keep the peace.” This is where we, as a society, must pause and ask: What are we rewarding?

Because if we reward system loyalty, functionality, and polished appearances – we get exactly the leaders we deserve. But we lose what matters most: relational integrity, professional resonance, and human safety.



5. What we must seek – and what we must leave behind

In a welfare system where people have direct authority over others’ lives, it must be a fundamental requirement that they can feel what their decisions do to others. That they possess a deep inner grounding, a rhythmic sense of responsibility, and that they do not use their roles for self-promotion but for relational carrying.

Those who lack this grounding – those who do not carry the system from within, but use it as a platform for personal gain – must not hold power. Period. They do not belong in leadership, in intake departments, in psychiatric decision-making rooms, in child welfare cases, or in positions of structural control.

It doesn’t necessarily require more testing, evaluations, or new systems. It requires courage. Courage to ask the question many fear: Is this person fit to hold power over other people’s lives?

And it requires that we start choosing differently. That we choose those who can feel – not those who can play the game. Those who are willing to stand alone if necessary – not those who say what the herd wants to hear.



6. Closing – A new compass for human leadership

We can no longer ignore that the welfare system is in crisis. Not just because of resources or structure. But because too many of those who lead it lack the human depth required to carry it.

We have allowed narcissism to take root in our public systems. We’ve called it “career ambition.” We’ve dressed it up in politeness and procedure. But it’s cost us dearly. People have been broken. Children have been failed. Professionals have been crushed by loyalty conflicts they should never have been placed in.

It’s time to say it out loud:
Some people should not hold power. Some people are unfit to lead – not because they are incompetent, but because they cannot feel what their power does to others.

If we are to salvage what can still be saved, we must rebuild our systems around rhythm, resonance, and relationship. And we must choose leaders who do not seek position – but connection. Not image – but responsibility. Not control – but carrying.

Only then can we create a welfare system no longer driven by narcissism’s blind self-centeredness – but by human integrity and rhythmic connectedness.




Narcissism: Understanding & Transcending It
This article refers to my forthcoming book on Nature-Based Human Development Theory, in which systemic powerlessness and culturally conditioned dissociation are analyzed in depth.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/when-body-falls-silent-critique-medical-paradigm-need-kristensen-5l19f

WHEN NARCISSISM GAINS POWER – AND THE WELFARE SYSTEM LOSES ITS HUMANITYA reckoning with the tyranny of self-interest, he...
16/08/2025

WHEN NARCISSISM GAINS POWER – AND THE WELFARE SYSTEM LOSES ITS HUMANITY
A reckoning with the tyranny of self-interest, herd mentality, and leadership culture in our public systems

By Ronnie Kristensen, Psychologist, Center for Nature-Based Human Development, Chief Psychologist at the Nordisk Krisekorps, and developer of Nature-Based Human Development Theory



1. Introduction – What we don’t dare say out loud

We often talk about structural issues. About lack of resources. About complexity. About unintended incidents. But we rarely talk about what I believe to be one of the most serious threats to human well-being in the Danish welfare system: people in positions of power who should never have been there.

I’m talking about professionals, leaders, and decision-makers who are not driven by relational responsibility, sensing, or resonance – but by egocentric, self-serving, and narcissistic self-interest. People who use the system to expand their control, protect their image, and cultivate their position, while making decisions that harm the most vulnerable in society.

This is a critique rarely voiced directly. We’ve built a culture where it’s seen as disloyal to point out when someone uses their authority to promote themselves rather than the community. But if we don’t have the courage to name it, these same individuals will keep climbing the system – leaving behind a trail of insecurity, powerlessness, and systemic violence.

This article is an attempt to break that silence. Not to point fingers blindly – but to direct our attention to where it should have been long ago: toward those who bear responsibility. Toward those who not only lack resonance – but who actively work against it.



2. Hidden power – authorization, decision-making, and the polished exterior

Narcissism in the system rarely shows up as the classically loud, self-aggrandizing figure we read about in psychology textbooks. It’s far more subtle. It hides behind politeness, professional jargon, credentials, and a shiny CV. But beneath the surface, the pattern is often the same: a person who uses others as means to personal ends, and who lacks the capacity to truly feel the consequences of their decisions on others’ bodies.

The most damaging actors in the system are rarely the noisiest. They are the ones who have mastered the language of the system. Those who know how to appear collaborative while shielding themselves from any form of accountability. They call it “strategic leadership.” They call it “difficult priorities.” But in truth, it’s a cold calculation: to use one’s position of power to make decisions without human consequence responsibility.

In Nature-Based Human Development Theory, I describe this as cultural dissociation: a condition where the human disappears behind the role. Where sensing shuts down, and the individual is guided only by external function and internal reward systems. This is where narcissism thrives best – and it is precisely here that we find some of the most influential decision-makers in our welfare system.



3. The tyranny of the herd – when the system protects the wrong people

A system built around collective loyalty and conformity will inevitably start protecting those who best perform this behavior. And that’s exactly why narcissistic and self-centered individuals are allowed to climb the hierarchy. Not because they are the most capable. But because they know how to mirror the system’s self-image and avoid being perceived as a threat to the structure.

Herd mentality plays a critical role. Those in authority surround themselves with others who reflect their worldview. External criticism is met with dismissal or ridicule. People who speak of sensing, relationship, and rhythm are viewed as emotionally driven and unprofessional. And those who dare to stand up to abuse are ostracized as disloyal.

This isn’t just unhealthy. It is downright dangerous. Because it means the system begins to manufacture its own blind spot. No one feels what’s happening anymore. And those who do remain silent – because otherwise, they risk losing their jobs, their colleagues, or their mental health.

In such a culture, the most attuned and ethically anchored professionals are marginalized, while the most tactically savvy – and emotionally disconnected – are rewarded. The result is a system that gradually loses its capacity to be human.


Tak – her kommer resten af oversættelsen:



4. When power becomes more important than people

Narcissistic use of power in the system isn’t always dramatic. Often, it’s everyday acts. A manager manipulating an employee’s self-image to maintain control. A caseworker falsifying a report to cover a mistake. A psychologist tailoring a conclusion to meet an official request because it’s easier. And everyone around them who knows it – but lets it happen.

The most dangerous thing about narcissism in the system isn’t one individual with power. It’s the culture that allows them to remain in power. That avoids asking hard questions because it’s “easier to keep the peace.” This is where we, as a society, must pause and ask: What are we rewarding?

Because if we reward system loyalty, functionality, and polished appearances – we get exactly the leaders we deserve. But we lose what matters most: relational integrity, professional resonance, and human safety.



5. What we must seek – and what we must leave behind

In a welfare system where people have direct authority over others’ lives, it must be a fundamental requirement that they can feel what their decisions do to others. That they possess a deep inner grounding, a rhythmic sense of responsibility, and that they do not use their roles for self-promotion but for relational carrying.

Those who lack this grounding – those who do not carry the system from within, but use it as a platform for personal gain – must not hold power. Period. They do not belong in leadership, in intake departments, in psychiatric decision-making rooms, in child welfare cases, or in positions of structural control.

It doesn’t necessarily require more testing, evaluations, or new systems. It requires courage. Courage to ask the question many fear: Is this person fit to hold power over other people’s lives?

And it requires that we start choosing differently. That we choose those who can feel – not those who can play the game. Those who are willing to stand alone if necessary – not those who say what the herd wants to hear.



6. Closing – A new compass for human leadership

We can no longer ignore that the welfare system is in crisis. Not just because of resources or structure. But because too many of those who lead it lack the human depth required to carry it.

We have allowed narcissism to take root in our public systems. We’ve called it “career ambition.” We’ve dressed it up in politeness and procedure. But it’s cost us dearly. People have been broken. Children have been failed. Professionals have been crushed by loyalty conflicts they should never have been placed in.

It’s time to say it out loud:
Some people should not hold power. Some people are unfit to lead – not because they are incompetent, but because they cannot feel what their power does to others.

If we are to salvage what can still be saved, we must rebuild our systems around rhythm, resonance, and relationship. And we must choose leaders who do not seek position – but connection. Not image – but responsibility. Not control – but carrying.

Only then can we create a welfare system no longer driven by narcissism’s blind self-centeredness – but by human integrity and rhythmic connectedness.




Narcissism: Understanding & Transcending It
This article refers to my forthcoming book on Nature-Based Human Development Theory, in which systemic powerlessness and culturally conditioned dissociation are analyzed in depth.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/when-body-falls-silent-critique-medical-paradigm-need-kristensen-5l19f

Adresse

Vestergade 16 2 Sal
Holstebro
HOLSTEBRO

Internet side

http://www.xn--naturnrudvikling-zob.dk/, http://www.xn--naturnrudvikling-zob.dk/

Underretninger

Vær den første til at vide, og lad os sende dig en email, når Naturnær Menneskelig Udviklingsteori sender nyheder og tilbud. Din e-mail-adresse vil ikke blive brugt til andre formål, og du kan til enhver tid afmelde dig.

Kontakt Praksis

Send en besked til Naturnær Menneskelig Udviklingsteori:

Del

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest Share on Reddit Share via Email
Share on WhatsApp Share on Instagram Share on Telegram

Type