24/10/2025
Why The Hypnotherapy Field Needs Science: A Balanced Rebuttal
Bridging the Divide Between Art, Intuition, and Evidence
I saw a couple of posts just recently stating that science has no place in the hypnosis and hypnotherapy field and why it shouldn’t play a role, and I wanted to offer a rebuttal to some of that rhetoric with a video today.
=====
Here are my references for those interested:
Benedetti, F. (2014). Placebo effects: Understanding the mechanisms in health and disease (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Jensen, M. P., Adachi, T., Tomé-Pires, C., Lee, J., Osman, Z. J., & Miró, J. (2015). Mechanisms of hypnosis: Toward the development of a biopsychosocial model. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 63(1), 34–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2014.961875
Jiang, H., White, M. P., Greicius, M. D., & Raz, A. (2017). Neural correlates of the hypnotic state and suggestibility: A meta-analytic study. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 81, 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.014
Kirsch, I. (1997). Response expectancy theory and application: A decennial review. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 6(2), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-1849(05)80012-5
Landry, M., Lifsh*tz, M., & Raz, A. (2017). Brain correlates of hypnosis: A systematic review and meta-analytic exploration. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 81, 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.010
Lynn, S. J., Kirsch, I., Knox, J., Fassler, O., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2021). Hypnosis and science: Theoretical, empirical, and clinical perspectives. American Psychologist, 76(7), 1062–1077. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000868