20/04/2026
I’m really excited to share that the research paper based on my Masters project has finally been published!
This is something I’ve been working on for a (very!) long time, with a lot of help and guidance from my fantastic supervisors who are experts in the field.
My research looked at front-of-package labelling (in particular, the Health Star Rating (HSR), which is used in Australia and New Zealand), and how well this aligns with dietary guidelines in Australia, and the Nova food classification system.
The main takeaways were that over 70% of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) and 58% of discretionary foods scored a “healthy pass” (≥2.5 stars out of a possible 5 stars) - despite updates to the HSR algorithm that were meant to bring it more in line with dietary guidelines. The proportion of UPFs scoring ≥2.5 stars also increased over the implementation period of the updated algorithm.
This shows that a high proportion of UPFs can still achieve “healthy” ratings, and although the results represent selective uptake of the HSR, mandating the current scheme (as is now planned in Australia) will still allow unhealthy products to display high ratings.
⭐️ Even if you’re not located in Australia or NZ, the results of our study may still be relevant: some other front-of-package labelling schemes use similar algorithms to the HSR, so are vulnerable to the same issues. Before starting my own research I completed a review paper of previous research, and found that many other schemes also allow unhealthy foods to achieve “healthy” ratings. Those that aligned best with the Nova classification system were the “warning label” schemes that are used in many Latin American countries.
Read the full article here: https://bit.ly/4vzzq3B