23/01/2019
It’s been a while since I’ve posted my DESIGN PRIMER series on my blog. The series aims to demystify my design process, specifically regarding logo or brand identity design. Work and life have kept me away from sharing over the past few months. But I’m happy to share the third part of the series today. Yay! This one is all about why crowd-sourcing your logo is a bad idea. Here is an excerpt below. Go to www.myturtleneck.com/blog to read the rest. (Link in bio)
“I must discuss design competitions, too. Simply put: I don’t believe in them. They fundamentally devalue the graphic design industry as a whole. It’s a way to, once again, get numerous submissions offering (if you’re lucky) a small cash prize and the promise of ‘exposure’ to the winner. For designers who agree to submit work they will likely never be compensated for, it shows how little they value to the years (and tuition money!) spent on their education. The promise of exposure is also a load of crap. A design competition audience is already the wrong audience to expose your work to. Participating designers are already selling themselves as someone who will work for (almost) free. This doesn’t set them up to meet clients that will respect and value their work. From where I’m standing, choosing the design competition route – particularly for something as important as your brand identity – does not say good things about your company. It's exploitive, arbitrary and a cheap-looking way to find the first and very important design solution.
It’s also worth pondering whether a crowd-sourced logo is truly what you want to be identified with for the next five, ten (or more) years.”