https://www.facebook.com/983098904882915/

Sexual Misconduct by Pinnacle Fertility, Scottsdale, AZ (2026)

02/27/2026

Chapter 2: [THE PERJURED COMPLAINT: How Pinnacle Weaponized the Courts to Lie, Conceal Its Sexual Scandals, Threaten and Extort the Truth-teller.]

After the truths in [Chapter 1—Sexual Misconduct and Lies] came to light, Pinnacle responded not with accountability, but with more lies. It deliberately and knowingly filed a false Verified Complaint against the truth-teller.

An executive signed this complaint under penalty of perjury. Pinnacle’s executive swore that she “has read the foregoing Verified Complaint and knows the contents thereof” and that the complaint “is true.” (See, Google Drive, Complaint. p. 9, for signed verification. Note: Pages 21-22 of the Complaint were heavily redacted by Pinnacle itself.)
However, a comparison of this sworn complaint with Pinnacle’s own subsequent admissions reveals a devastating pattern of deception.

Evidence of Perjury: The Material Lies

1. The Lie About Craig Park's Sexual Misconduct

• What Pinnacle Swore Under Oath: In its Verified Complaint, Pinnacle swore under oath that the statements in [Chapter 1] were "completely fabricated and false." Those statements stated that its Lab Director, Craig Park, engaged in a pattern of s*xual misconduct, including sending s*xual texts to young women, soliciting s*x by identifying himself as a "reproductive doctor," abusing his power to pressure subordinates at Pinnacle into unwanted s*xual relationships, and evading questions about a subordinate with whom he has a s*xual relationship. (See, Google Drive same link, Complaint, para. 14, 21, and exhibits.) https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1CtJOE1X7ZIwJqj-2AgqqayV0kZXRCB-S?usp=sharing

• What Pinnacle Later Admitted/Stated: When confronted in a later court proceeding, Pinnacle first dodged the question by falsely claiming the straightforward questions were "vague." Then, it made a directly contradictory statement: Pinnacle claimed that it "lacks knowledge" to admit or deny these very matters. (See, Google Drive same link, ’s Responses, Requests for Admission, Nos. 3, 4, 5, 14, 17-18.)
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1CtJOE1X7ZIwJqj-2AgqqayV0kZXRCB-S?usp=sharing

• When Pinnacle was asked to admit that it has never taken any disciplinary, investigative, or corrective action against Craig Park for abusing his authority at Pinnacle to engage in s*xual relationships with subordinates, Pinnacle first attempted to evade the question. It falsely characterized the straightforward request as "vague," and ultimately stated that it could neither admit nor deny it.

Specifically, Pinnacle responded: “Objection. This Request is vague, ambiguous, and not susceptible to reasonable interpretation, and seeks information that is neither relevant nor reasonably calculated to lead to discoverable information. Objecting further, this Request seeks information that is subject to attorney-client privilege. Based on the foregoing objection, Pinnacle cannot admit or deny.” (See, Google Drive same link, ’s Responses, Requests for Admission, Nos. 3, 4, 5, 14, 17-18.)

• Pinnacle swore under oath that a fact is false, yet simultaneously claimed it lacked knowledge of its truth. This contradiction is direct evidence that its original sworn statement was a lie—one crafted to shield its leadership from accountability for s*xual misconduct.

2. The Lie About Dr. Akas Jain’s Sexual Harassment and Retaliation

• What Pinnacle Swore Under Oath: Its Verified Complaint swore that the reference to *Franklin County Case No. 23-CV-6324*—a lawsuit detailing Dr. Jain's s*xual harassment of employees and Pinnacle's retaliatory firing of them—was "completely fabricated and false." (See, Google Drive, Complaint. para. 14, 21, and exhibits.)

• What Pinnacle Later Admitted: In its discovery responses, after it again tried to dodge the confrontation by falsely accusing the straightforward question of being vague, Pinnacle admitted that the Jain case exists. It lamely stated that the court records "speak for themselves." (See, Google Drive same link, ’s Responses, Request for Admission No. 8.)

• By admitting the Jain case is real and exists, Pinnacle confesses that its original sworn statement—calling the existence of a public court case "completely fabricated"—was a knowing and intentional lie to the court and all citizens.

3. The Lie About Lawsuits Against Its Own Doctors

• What Pinnacle Swore Under Oath: Its Verified Complaint swore that references to *Summit County Case Nos. CV-2023-10-3993* and *CV-2019-09-3633*, where Pinnacle itself sued its prior medical doctors and was sued, were "completely fabricated and false." (See, Google Drive same link, Complaint, para. 14, 21, and exhibits.)

• What Pinnacle Later Admitted: In its responses, Pinnacle followed its now-familiar pattern: a spurious "vague" objection/accusation, followed by the admission that these cases, too, are real and exist. It again offered the hollow retort that the records "speak for themselves." (See, Google Drive, ’s Responses, Requests for Admission Nos. 9-10.)

• Pinnacle swore in a court filing that its own lawsuits did not exist by falsely labeling them as "completely fabricated." This is a provable material lie under oath.

The Pattern of Obstruction:
To ensure the full extent of its deception could not be exposed, Pinnacle refused to answer critical questions and declined to produce any of the documents requested during the legal discovery process, such as whether its higherups have been to U.S. Virgin Islands and Little Saint James, where Jeffrey Epstein often visited. This pattern of stonewalling is of a wrongdoer determined to conceal the truth and lie to the entire society and all citizens at any cost.

02/27/2026

[Chapter 1—Sexual Misconduct and Lies] [See Chapter 2 in a separate post.]

Pinnacle Fertility is deleting comments truthfully revealing their s*xual misconduct, as what Pinnacle has always been doing—using all means to silent their victims of s*xual abuse.

Pinnacle has admitted to deleting comments on the internet and disabling review page on Facebook after the information was disclosed. (See, Google Drive, ’s responses to confrontation questions; p. 6, Request for Admission No. 11; p.10, Request for Admission No. 24-25.) https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1CtJOE1X7ZIwJqj-2AgqqayV0kZXRCB-S?usp=drive_link

Pinnacle has a pattern of shielding the s*xual abusers who work for it and retaliating against victims of abuse.

Pinnacle Fertility’s higherups, such as Dr. Nate Zoneraich, appeared to have had close relationships with Jeffrey Epstein. When asked whether Pinnacle’s higherups have been to some specific places where Epstein often visited, such as U.S. Virgin Islands and Little Saint James, Pinnacle first evaded the question by falsely accusing the straightforward question of vagueness, and then Pinnacle said it lacks knowledge to admit or deny it. (See, Google drive same link, patient’s Reddit post. See also, ’s responses, p. 11, Request for Admission No. 26.)

Pinnacle Fertility lab director, Craig Park, from Canada, has been abusing his power at work to pressure female subordinates into having unlawful s*xual relationships with him. According to former Pinnacle employee, Matthew Hudnall: Craig Park has slept with many of his female subordinates at Pinnacle.

Despite knowing Park’s s*xual misconduct towards the young women he supervises, Pinnacle not only refuses to discipline Craig Park but also gives him promotion and pay raises. When asked whether it has taken any action against Park for his abuse of power at Pinnacle to pressure subordinates into s*xual relationships, Pinnacle first evaded the question by falsely accusing the straightforward question of vagueness, and then Pinnacle said it lacks knowledge to admit or deny it. (See, Google Drive same link, ’s responses, p. 4-6, Request for Admission No. 3, 4, 5)

According to Park’s testimony, Pinnacle pays him over 300k per year, even though he has been using his authority to pressure young women he supervises at Pinnacle into s*x.

Craig Park testified and admitted that he has been Ms. Nur Zarith Sofea Zakaria’s (a.k.a. Sofea Zakaria) supervisor at Pinnacle since 2018, but when asked whether he has had s*xual relationships with Zakaria, Park dodged the question and refused to answer. (See, Google Drive same link, of Park’s testimony.)

Craig Park, referring to himself as a “Canadian doctor who works in human reproduction,” has also asked young women, “when was the last time you slept with a Canadian doctor who works in human reproduction,” and he told the young women he “tempted to say he recommend that the women sleep with him.” (See, Google Drive same link, Park messages.)

The Park matter isn’t an isolated incident. Pinnacle has pattern of protecting s*xual abusers while punishing victims.

Pinnacle doctor Dr. Akas Jain s*xually harassed two female Pinnacle employees. Rather than protecting women’s safety, Pinnacle retaliated against the victims by firing the two female employees shortly after they reported Dr. Jain’s misconduct to the authorities, prioritizing Dr. Jain’s profitability to the company over the protection of its victims. (Franklin County Court, Ohio. Case No. 23-CV-6324.)

Pinnacle has demonstrated a pattern of disparaging and victim-blaming conduct by repeatedly referring to s*xually assaulted women as “salacious” in its court filings. (Franklin County Court, Ohio. Case No. 20-CV-8213.)

Pinnacle sent threatening letters through lawyers to its former doctor, seeking to ban the doctor from providing medical services elsewhere after she was terminated by Pinnacle without any fault on her part. (Summit County Court, Ohio. Case No. 2023-CV-10-3993.)

Concerned that former doctors’ medical services would harm its profits, Pinnacle sued another doctor and sought a court order barring him from providing medical services to patients elsewhere after he had resigned from Pinnacle. (Summit County, Ohio, Case No. CV-2019-09-3633.)

While Dr. Akas Jain/Dr. David Nash s*xually assaulted patients, Pinnacle instead chose to send threatening letters to the victims, warning that they would be bankrupted by its litigation unless they agreed to remain silent.

In an apparent effort to evade scrutiny – as Pinnacle is afraid that the confrontation/deposition would disclose its s*xual misconduct – in court filing, Pinnacle Fertility - through its lawyer Brandon Pauley - deliberately lied by falsely claiming that “Plaintiff unilaterally ‘noticed’ the deposition of RGI [Pinnacle] on May 19, 2025 for a deposition to occur on June 6, 2025 without contacting RGI [Pinnacle]’s counsel prior to or after serving the Notice.” (See, Google Drive same link, 's court filing.)

Yet, the truth is: the plaintiff in that matter not only contacted RGI [Pinnacle]’s counsels multiple times (on May 5, 12 and 16, 2025) prior to serving the notice but also continued to contact RGI [Pinnacle]’s counsels (on May 19, 2025) after serving the notice. (See, Google Drive same link, emails exchanged between Pinnacle and the plaintiff.)

Further, on May 15, 2025, RGI [Pinnacle]’s counsel, Brandon Pauley, even replied to the plaintiff’s emails, which were sent to him on May 5 and 12. Mr. Pauley's replies to the plaintiff’s emails proved he was fully aware of the fact that the plaintiff had contacted him multiple times prior to serving the notice of deposition.

Sadly, about two weeks after he replied to the plaintiff’s emails, which proved his awareness of the communications, on June 2, Mr. Pauley still knowingly lied to the court by claiming that the plaintiff didn’t contact him. (See, Google Drive same link, #4.)

Pinnacle Fertility and its lawyer have the pattern of deliberately lying to the courts, the society, and the citizens in order to shield the s*xual abusers who work for Pinnacle from accountability and scrutiny.

Pinnacle called the police on its own patient(s) in Arizona because the patient(s) requested a refund. (See, Google Drive same link, #6.)

Pinnacle Fertility maliciously violated IVF service agreement and refused to provide services after withholding deposits from about 90 clients. Byt Tammuz Family Ltd. v. Pinnacle Fertility Inc. (Case No. 25STCV27685, California Superior Court, Los Angeles County)

Pinnacle Fertility harassed and even maliciously discriminated against its employee and then wrongfully fired him. (Case No. 25STCV07446, California Superior Court, Los Angeles County)

Because Pinnacle failed to pay the worker's compensation that should have been paid, Pinnacle Fertility was ordered by the Court to pay the workers. (Albany County, NY. Judgment No. 90375423)

02/27/2026

Summary:

1. Available information show that Pinnacle doctor Dr. Nate Zoneraich was connected to Jeffrey Epstein and has s*xually assaulted patients and minors.

2. According to two former Pinnacle employees and their attorneys, another Pinnacle doctor, Dr. Akas Jain, s*xually harassed two women on staff. Soon after the two victims reported him, Pinnacle fired them in retaliation instead of protecting the women or disciplining Dr. Jain. (Franklin County, Case No. 23-CV-6324)

3. Pinnacle has admitted it's been deleting comments about its employees’ s*xual misconduct.

4. In order to conceal its s*x abuse scandals, threaten its victims, and even extort its victims by demanding money, Pinnacle not only lies, but also deliberately filed a false Verified Complaint in court—under penalty of Perjury. The evidence — including those produced by Pinnacle itself — shows that Pinnacle knowingly file a false verified complaint.

[Due to word count limitations, this has been divided into smaller sections, including Chapters 1 and 2. Each chapter is set forth in detail and supported by the attached evidence. Please refer to the other posts on this page for the complete documentation and supporting materials for the remaining chapters.]

01/30/2026

Pinnacle Fertility is deleting comments truthfully revealing their s*xual misconduct, as what Pinnacle has always been doing - using all means to silent their victims of s*xual abuse.

Pinnacle has a pattern of shielding the s*xual abusers who work for it and retaliating against victims of abuse. Soon after the following information was posted on Pinnacle’s Facebook review page, Pinnacle disabled its review page on Facebook to conceal their s*xual misconduct.

Pinnacle Fertility’s higherups appeared to have had close relationships with Jeffrey Epstein. And then Pinnacle deleted the relevant information from the social media platforms.

Pinnacle Fertility lab director, Craig Park, from Canada, has been abusing his power at work to pressure female subordinates into having unlawful s*xual relationships with him.

According to former Pinnacle employee, Matthew Hudnall: Craig Park has slept with many of his female subordinates at Pinnacle.

Despite knowing Park’s s*xual misconduct towards the young women he supervises, Pinnacle not only refuses to discipline Craig Park but also gives him promotion and pay raises.

According to Park’s testimony, Pinnacle pays him over 300k per year, even though he has been using his authority to pressure young women he supervises at Pinnacle into s*x.

Craig Park testified and admitted that he has been Ms. Nur Zarith Sofea Zakaria’s (a.k.a. Sofea Zakaria) supervisor at Pinnacle since 2018, but when asked whether he has had s*xual relationships with Zakaria, Park dodged the question and refused to answer.

(See the transcript of Craig Park’s testimony in https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1CtJOE1X7ZIwJqj-2AgqqayV0kZXRCB-S?usp=drive_link.)

Craig Park, referring to himself as a “Canadian doctor who works in human reproduction,” has also asked young women, “when was the last time you slept with a Canadian doctor who works in human reproduction,” and he told the young women he “tempted to say he recommend that the women sleep with him.” (See screenshot in the same link above.)

The Park matter isn’t an isolated incident. Pinnacle has pattern of protecting s*xual abusers while punishing victims.

Pinnacle doctor Dr. Akas Jain s*xually harassed two female Pinnacle employees. Rather than protecting women’s safety, Pinnacle retaliated against the victims by firing the two female employees shortly after they reported Dr. Jain’s misconduct to the authorities, prioritizing Dr. Jain’s profitability to the company over the protection of its victims. (Franklin County Court, Ohio. Case No. 23-CV-6324.)

Pinnacle has demonstrated a pattern of disparaging and victim-blaming conduct by repeatedly referring to s*xually assaulted women as “salacious” in its court filings. (Franklin County Court, Ohio. Case No. 20-CV-8213.)

Pinnacle sent threatening letters through lawyers to its former doctor, seeking to ban the doctor from providing medical services elsewhere after she was terminated by Pinnacle without any fault on her part. (Summit County Court, Ohio. Case No. 2023-CV-10-3993.)

Concerned that former doctors’ medical services would harm its profits, Pinnacle sued another doctor and sought a court order barring him from providing medical services to patients elsewhere after he had resigned from Pinnacle. (Summit County, Ohio, Case No. CV-2019-09-3633.)

While Dr. Akas Jain/Dr. David Nash s*xually assaulted patients, Pinnacle instead chose to send threatening letters to the victims, warning that they would be bankrupted by its litigation unless they agreed to remain silent.

In an apparent effort to evade scrutiny – as Pinnacle is afraid that the confrontation/deposition would disclose its s*xual misconduct – in court filing, Pinnacle Fertility - through its lawyer Brandon Pauley - deliberately lied by falsely claiming that “Plaintiff unilaterally ‘noticed’ the deposition of RGI [Pinnacle] on May 19, 2025 for a deposition to occur on June 6, 2025 without contacting RGI [Pinnacle]’s counsel prior to or after serving the Notice.” (See Pinnacle's court filing in the same link above.)

Yet, the truth is: the plaintiff in that matter not only contacted RGI [Pinnacle]’s counsels multiple times (on May 5, 12 and 16, 2025) prior to serving the notice but also continued to contact RGI [Pinnacle]’s counsels (on May 19, 2025) after serving the notice. (See the emails exchanged between Pinnacle and the plaintiff in the same link above.)

Further, on May 15, 2025, RGI [Pinnacle]’s counsel, Brandon Pauley, even replied to the plaintiff’s emails, which were sent to him on May 5 and 12. Pauley's replies to the plaintiff’s emails proved he was fully aware of the fact that the plaintiff had contacted him multiple times prior to serving the notice of deposition.

Sadly, about two weeks after he replied to the plaintiff’s emails, which proved his awareness of the communications, on June 2, Pauley still knowingly lied to the court by claiming that the plaintiff didn’t contact him. (See the link above for his court filing.)

Pinnacle Fertility and its lawyer have the pattern of deliberately lying to the courts, the society, and the citizens in order to shield the s*xual abusers who work for Pinnacle from accountability and scrutiny.

Despite knowing that the statements in this article were true, Pinnacle filed a "verified complaint," which Pinnacle knows to contain false allegations but signed under penalty of perjury, to threaten its victim, conceal the information about its misconduct, and demand money from its victim. [This section will be supplemented with documentary evidence as discovery is ongoing.]

Pinnacle Fertility maliciously violated IVF service agreement and refused to provide services after withholding deposits from about 90 clients. Byt Tammuz Family Ltd. v. Pinnacle Fertility Inc. (Case No. 25STCV27685, California Superior Court, Los Angeles County)

Pinnacle Fertility harassed and even maliciously discriminated against its employee and then wrongfully fired him. (Case No. 25STCV07446, California Superior Court, Los Angeles County)

Because Pinnacle failed to pay the worker's compensation that should have been paid, Pinnacle Fertility was ordered by the Court to pay the workers. (Albany County, NY. Judgment No. 90375423)

Sexual Misconduct by Pinnacle Fertility

02/27/2026

02/27/2026

02/27/2026

01/30/2026

Address

Website

Alerts

Shortcuts

Share

Category