01/12/2026
Over the past few months, I’ve shared research on parental consideration: how consistently taking your child’s viewpoint and experience into account supports development across ages, contexts, and domains.
We also explored what gets in the way: our minds pulling us from the present moment, and our adult lens distorting what we see. We talked about the shift from what "should be" to noticing what actually is, and discovering the power of precision over force.
In their integrative review, researchers Mireille Joussemet and Wendy Grolnick (2022) offer both a framework for understanding how diverse parenting traditions converge on what supports development, and a practical sequence for putting “consideration” into action.
They anchor this sequence in attachment researcher Mary Ainsworth’s definition of sensitivity: the ability to notice a child’s signals, interpret them accurately, and respond promptly and appropriately.
Let me share what their synthesis reveals about each step:
1) Notice.
Noticing begins with detecting signals, what has been compared to: a “radio receiver” picking up a weak broadcast based on Ainsworth’s descriptions. The key is seeing beyond the obvious, recognizing that even subtle shifts can be meaningful: the change in energy, the pause, the slight tension, the quietness that isn’t the same quietness as yesterday.
Although noticing has often been studied in infancy, the skill itself matters at every age. Children are always communicating state, whether verbally or not.
2) Interpret.
Accurately interpreting the child’s experience is the heart of sensitivity, and in this synthesis, of parental consideration.
A sensitive parent doesn’t just notice a child has become quiet; they interpret whether that quietness signals contentment, overwhelm, processing, disconnection, shame, or something else entirely.
Joussemet and Grolnick show how research on empathy and perspective-taking across traditions speaks to this same capacity: understanding what the child is actually experiencing, rather than relying on assumptions or expectations.
This doesn’t require sharing the child’s feelings. But it does require treating their experience as real and meaningful to them.
Because when signals are misread - interpreting distress as defiance, overwhelm as laziness, or anxiety as attitude - even a prompt, well-intentioned response can miss the mark.
3) Respond.
A helpful response is prompt, contingent, and appropriate:
* Prompt matters because children’s states shift quickly; what helps now may not help five minutes later.
* Contingent means the response connects to what’s happening for the child, rather than redirecting them elsewhere.
* Appropriate means it’s matched to what the child needs in their current state.
Notice how all three aspects work together. It would be possible to respond quickly and “on topic” (contingently) by criticizing or interrupting (“Don’t touch that”), but that isn’t consideration. Consideration means responding in a way that supports the child’s experience and development.
Importantly, responding with consideration does not mean doing whatever a child wants. Ainsworth was explicit about this. Sensitive parents do not comply with a child’s demands when doing so would be unsafe or developmentally unhelpful. What distinguishes a considerate response is not compliance, but how limits are held.
Even when a child is disappointed or unhappy, the response can still be considerate if it acknowledges the child’s experience, maintains connection, and offers an alternative the child can realistically manage in their current state. The goal is not to eliminate distress at all costs, but to support regulation, safety, and growth, rather than escalating the system through dismissal, coercion, or power struggles.
Notice also how the steps in this sequence aren’t independent of each other. Each step builds on the previous one: you can’t interpret accurately without noticing what’s actually there, and you can’t respond appropriately without an accurate interpretation of the signals you’ve noticed.
How does this all integrate?
Parental consideration brings together what multiple lines of developmental and parenting research have shown about what supports healthy development. In their synthesis, Joussemet and Grolnick demonstrate that constructs emerging from different theoretical traditions, such as sensitivity, responsiveness, and autonomy support, are not competing ideas, but different ways of describing a shared underlying process: parents taking the child’s perspective and experience into account when responding.
By introducing parental consideration as a unifying construct, the authors move the focus away from specific techniques and toward the quality of engagement between parent and child. What matters is not whether a parent follows a particular strategy, but whether their response is grounded in an accurate reading of the child’s current experience.
From my perspective, this synthesis also creates a natural bridge to a dynamic, systems-oriented way of understanding development.
When we look at parental consideration through a dynamic systems lens, what becomes visible is that “notice → interpret → respond” is not a linear checklist. These steps don’t simply follow one another; they are interdependent, continuously shaping each other through feedback loops.
This means the process can shift direction at multiple points and for multiple reasons. If a signal is misinterpreted and the response doesn’t fit the child’s current state, it isn’t possible to simply “rewind” and redo what would have worked earlier, because the system has already changed. The child is now responding to the parent’s response. A new state has emerged, and the interaction has to be met as it is now.
This is why the same response can work beautifully one day and fail completely the next.
It’s not necessarily that you did it wrong. It’s that you’re encountering a living system in a different state.
And once parenting is understood this way, the goal stops being “finding the right technique.” It becomes learning to read current system dynamics and staying responsive to what is unfolding in the moment.
This broader lens - how complex living systems organize, adapt, and sometimes struggle- is the one I bring to understanding development and what my broader work explores.
Going forward, I’ll be writing from that framework at . If this exploration of parental consideration resonated with you, I invite you to continue there, especially if you’re drawn to understanding the patterns beneath what looks like chaos, and learning to work with nervous system and relational dynamics rather than against them.
Source: Joussemet, M., & Grolnick, W. S. (2022). Parental consideration of children's experiences: A critical review of parenting constructs. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 14(4), 593-619.