01/09/2026
Please read this article. It gives you a great overview of how ballistic tests are performed for self-defense handgun cartridges and dispelling some of those myths that people love to hang onto as truths!
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/17jJEAnwci/
History and Purpose of Ballistic Gelatin
Ballistic gelatin has been used for decades as a consistent tissue simulant for testing how bullets behave upon impact. After the 1986 FBI Miami shootout, the FBI sought a more scientific, standardized way to test ammunition performance.
In 1988, the FBI’s Fi****ms Training Unit developed a rigorous ammunition testing protocol based on consultation with wound ballistics and medical experts. This protocol introduced 10% calibrated ballistic gelatin (10% gelatin by weight in water, kept at ~4 °C) as the standard test medium. Before this, there was no uniform standard. Agencies and ammo makers used everything from clay to wet phone books. The FBI’s adoption of calibrated gel provided a single, repeatable yardstick for comparing bullet performance.
What does “calibrated” mean? It means each gel block is tested with a standard projectile to ensure consistency. The FBI uses a 0.177″ steel BB fired at 590 ft/s (±15 ft/s); to pass calibration, the BB must pe*****te 8.5 cm (about 3.35″) in the gelatin (acceptable range ~7.5-9.5 cm, or 2.95-3.74″). If the gelatin block is too soft or too dense (BB goes too deep or too shallow), it’s discarded. This calibration step ensures the gel’s density and resistance closely match the intended standard, roughly equivalent to the density of human muscle tissue. Research by the FBI and others found that properly calibrated 10% ordnance gelatin has mechanical properties similar to living muscle and can serve as a reliable surrogate for soft tissue in controlled tests.
Ballistic Gelatin in Standardized Testing (FBI Protocol)
The intended purpose of using calibrated gelatin is to provide a uniform medium to measure bullet pe*******on, expansion, and performance in a repeatable way. The FBI’s test protocol involves firing bullets into gelatin under a variety of scenarios to simulate real-world conditions. Each round is first shot into bare gelatin (a plain 10% gel block) at 10 feet, and then through several common barriers into gelatin.
The FBI protocol includes tests with heavy clothing, drywall (wallboard), sheet steel (auto body), plywood, and laminated auto glass in front of the gel. After passing through the barrier, the bullet enters the gelatin, and investigators measure how far it pe*****ted, how much it expanded, and how much weight it retained. This comprehensive test series became known as the “FBI protocol,” and it gave law enforcement a measurable standard for duty ammunition performance.
Ammunition that could pe*****te 12-18 inches in 10% gel, while expanding and retaining weight, was deemed effective; less than 12″ pe*******on was considered inadequate (risking failure to reach vital organs), while over 18″ raised concerns of over-pe*******on.
In fact, 14-16″ of pe*******on is often cited as ideal. These numbers didn’t come out of thin air, they were informed by events like the Miami incident, where a bullet stopped short of an assailant’s heart.
The FBI’s research determined that ~12″ minimum pe*******on in gel was needed to ensure a bullet can reach vital organs even through an arm or from various angles. Bullets that fall short of 12″ in the standardized gel test are heavily penalized in scoring, reflecting that they might fail to incapacitate a threat in real life.
By establishing this protocol and the gelatin test medium, the FBI enabled apples-to-apples comparisons of ammunition. Gelatin testing today is used not only by law enforcement, but also by ammunition manufacturers and independent testers to evaluate personal defense ammo. The widespread adoption of 10% calibrated gel means that whether it’s a 9mm or a .45 ACP, one can directly compare their pe*******on depths and expansion under identical conditions.
This standardization has driven huge improvements in bullet design over the years. Bullet makers design jacketed hollow points specifically to perform well in the FBI gel tests, which correlates with better real-world performance. For example, after the FBI began these tests, many manufacturers improved their 9mm and .38 Special bullets (which had been considered under-powered) to pe*****te deeper.
Modern 9mm defensive rounds, thanks to advanced bullet engineering (bonded cores, better expansion mechanisms, etc.), can now consistently meet the 12-18 inch pe*******on goal, just like larger calibers. In fact, the improvement has been so dramatic that the FBI, which shifted to .40 S&W in the 1990s for more pe*******on, eventually moved back to 9mm in the 2010s, once 9mm ammunition technology proved it could perform on par with the larger calibers in the gel tests.
What Ballistic Gelatin Represents (and What It Doesn’t)
It’s important to understand what ballistic gelatin is and is not. The 10% gelatin block is essentially a proxy for average density muscle tissue. When prepared and calibrated correctly, its density and resistance to pe*******on mimic muscle tissue reasonably well.
The FBI chose muscle as the benchmark because muscle is tougher than many other soft tissues (like fat) and is found throughout the body, making it a “worst-case” soft tissue scenario to test against.
In other words, if a bullet can pe*****te 12-18″ of gelatin, it should pe*****te deeply enough in a human aggressor even if it encounters cartilage, gristle, or has to go through an outstretched arm first. Ballistic gelatin is a homogeneous medium, the same consistency all the way through, which makes it excellent for repeatable tests.
Every calibrated gel block, whether in one lab or another, should perform alike, so results can be compared across different tests and sources. This uniformity is the strength of ballistic gelatin as a testing tool.
However, gelatin is not a perfect simulacrum of a human body. Real tissue are heterogeneous and complex: skin, fat, muscle, organs, and bones are layered and have different elasticity.
Human muscle and organs can shift, stretch, or tear in ways that a plain gel block might not capture. Gel blocks also lack bones. A bullet that sails 15″ through gel might break apart or stop early if it hits a femur or rib in a real target.
Moreover, gelatin typically shows an exaggerated temporary cavity on high-speed cameras, that dramatic ballooning blast effect you see in slow-motion gel videos.
In gel, you might observe a wide sphere of jello being pushed outward (a visual representation of the bullet’s shock wave and temporary cavity). In living tissue, much of that stretch may not translate to catastrophic damage. Muscle and organs are elastic to a degree and contained in the body; they don’t fling apart as dramatically. Many viewers see those slow-motion gelatin shots and imagine a person would be equally “blown apart,” but that’s a misunderstanding. In reality, handgun bullets, especially, do not usually produce extreme explosive trauma, the effects are often far less spectacular than gelatin videos suggest. In fact, experts often caution that gelatin test results allow educated guesses about performance in flesh, but they are not guarantees.
For instance, a bullet that expands to double its diameter and pe*****tes 14″ in gel is likely to cause a significant wound in a human, but exactly how it damages tissue (or whether it hits something vital) will vary case by case. Gel testing provides consistent baseline data, not a movie-style prediction of what will happen.
To address a specific misconception: “12 inches of gel pe*******on equals 12 inches of real-world pe*******on.” This is not a one-to-one equivalence. The 12″ (30 cm) measure in 10% gelatin is a standardized gauge under specific conditions. In a human body, a bullet’s path and depth will depend on what it encounters, penetrating 12″ of pure muscle vs. 12″ that include bone or tougher organs can be very different.
The FBI’s 12-18″ rule means that in a uniform medium analogous to muscle, the bullet can reach critical internal depths. It doesn’t mean an assailant’s body is 12″ thick or that a bullet will always travel exactly 12″ inside a person. Rather, if a bullet does 12″ in calibrated gel, we infer it should be capable of reaching vital organs from various angles (like a frontal shot that must pass through an arm first, or a side shot through layers of muscle).
Pe*******on in gel is best used comparatively, not literally. Think of gel results as a way to compare one bullet to another under the same conditions. If Bullet A pe*****tes 14″ and Bullet B 8″ in gel, we know A pe*****tes deeper in a consistent medium. But in a real encounter, if Bullet B hits no bones and Bullet A hits a rib, their actual pe*******on in the body might differ. The gel test simply sets an expectation that Bullet B might risk not penetrating enough under tougher conditions, whereas Bullet A has a larger safety margin. The key is that gel provides a controlled environment to measure bullet performance characteristics (pe*******on depth, expansion size, fragmentation, etc.) in a repeatable way.
Common Misunderstandings of Gel Tests
Myth 1: “Dramatic slow-motion gel tests show exactly what happens in a human body.”
Reality: Those high-speed videos of bullets hitting gelatin are fascinating and useful, but they can be misleading if taken as literal human wound profiles. The gelatin block often jumps and cavitates violently because it has uniform density and is not attached to anything. In a person, tissues are connected to a skeleton and supported by skin. They won’t jolt and rebound quite like a free block of gel.
The temporary cavity does correspond to stretching of tissues, which can contribute to wounding, but in human tissue many organs and blood vessels can stretch without rupturing immediately. Gel exaggerates the visible effect, whereas in reality a handgun bullet’s temporary cavity might cause subtle internal injuries that aren’t apparent externally.
So, while gel videos are useful to see how a bullet expands or fragments, one should not assume the magnitude of the gelatin’s reaction equals the damage done in a body. In fact, the FBI and wound ballistics experts emphasize that consistent pe*******on and bullet placement are more critical than any flashy explosion of gel.
The dramatic visuals are mostly a byproduct of the test medium being homogeneous and free to move. They demonstrate the bullet’s energy transfer, but a determined attacker might not be stopped unless a vital organ or CNS is hit, regardless of the temporary cavity size. In short, gel tests show relative performance (e.g. one bullet might create a larger temporary cavity or pe*****te deeper than another in gel), but they do not show exactly what a wound in living tissue would look like.
Myth 2: “If a bullet pe*****tes X inches in gel, it will pe*****te the same in a person.”
Reality: As discussed, gel pe*******on is a guideline, not a direct measure of inches in flesh. Twelve inches of gel ≠ twelve inches in a human. Bullets slow down or deform differently when encountering varying tissues.
For example, a bullet might pe*****te 15″ in bare gel, but if that same bullet hits a human who is wearing heavy clothing and the bullet strikes a rib, it might only go, say, 9″ into the body, or could stop sooner if it loses energy shattering bone.
Conversely, if a bullet misses bones and travels through soft tissue, it might actually pe*****te further than it did in gel. The FBI’s 12-18″ standard is intentionally conservative to account for these uncertainties. They wanted a bullet that at minimum can do 12″ in gel, believing this gives a good chance it will still reach vital organs through muscle, clothing, or intermediate barriers in a real shooting.
So, while the gel pe*******on number is very useful for comparing ammo, it’s not a precise prediction. Think of it like car crash tests: if a car’s safety cage holds up in a standardized crash test, it implies good protection, but real crashes vary. Similarly, 15″ of gel pe*******on suggests a robust bullet, but actual gunshot outcomes will depend on shot placement and target anatomy. Always interpret gel results as general indicators of performance rather than exact translations to real-world injury depth.
Myth 3: “Ballistic gel is supposed to simulate the entire human body.”
Reality: Gel is actually meant to simulate soft tissue (muscle) only. It deliberately does not include bone or complex organ structures, because those are much less uniform and harder to standardize.
The value of gelatin is that it’s the same everywhere. This lets testers isolate what the bullet itself is doing. If you introduced bones or varying tissues into the test medium, it would be more “realistic” in one specific scenario but far less consistent across different tests.
The FBI protocol addresses variability by adding separate barrier tests (like shooting through glass or plywood into gel) to see how bullets perform after defeating those obstacles. But the core measurement is still done in gelatin to keep things controlled. Everyone understands a bullet will behave differently in a human body (where it might glance off a bone or yaw unexpectedly), but by examining performance in gel, you get a baseline for pe*******on and expansion without those extra variables.
In summary, ballistic gelatin is a comparative tool, not a full-blown anatomical model. It’s the standard medium so that testers around the world speak the same language when they say, for example, “this 9mm pe*****ted 15″ and expanded to 0.60″ diameter through heavy clothing in gel.” That way, both law enforcement and civilians can make informed choices knowing those figures come from a consistent test medium.
Service Calibers and FBI Performance Standards
One major outcome of the FBI’s gelatin testing standards has been the levelling of the playing field among common defensive handgun calibers. In the past, there were heated debates about 9mm vs .45 ACP “stopping power,” or whether .40 S&W was superior, etc.
Today, thanks to modern bullet design, the truth is that all mainstream service calibers can be effective, because they’re all engineered to meet the same FBI performance criteria.
Whether it’s .380 ACP, 9×19mm, .40 S&W, or .45 ACP, the premium defensive hollow-point loads in these calibers are typically designed to pe*****te roughly 12-18″ in gel and expand reliably along the way.
This means that when you use quality ammunition, a .40 S&W and a 9mm will both likely pe*****te to a similar depth in gelatin and cause a similar size wound cavity.
The differences in real-world terminal effect between these calibers become much smaller than many people assume, provided the bullets perform as intended.
For instance, data has shown a modern 147 gr 9mm JHP can expand to about the same diameter and pe*****te as far as a 180 gr .40 S&W JHP, because both are built to hit that FBI sweet spot.
A .45 ACP might start a bit larger in diameter, but its bullet is slower; a 9mm is smaller but faster. In the end, both can be made to pe*****te ~14″ and expand, achieving very comparable results in gel tests. Even the .380 ACP, historically seen as marginal, has benefited from advanced bullet designs. While .380 is on the lower end of accepted performance, some newer .380 JHP loads do meet the 12″ minimum in gel (often by sacrificing some expansion for pe*******on). The FBI’s testing pushed manufacturers to improve even these small calibers.
What this means for both law enforcement and civilians is that shot placement and bullet choice are usually more important than caliber.
A well-designed 9mm bullet that meets the standard will perform as required, just as a well-designed .45 will. Neither is a magic “one-shot stopper” if it doesn’t hit something vital, and both are adequate if they do.
In law enforcement, many agencies moved back to 9mm because it offers higher capacity and easier recoil management while still meeting the FBI gel performance.
For civilian self-defense, the takeaway is to choose a reliable, tested defensive load in whatever caliber you carry. Don’t rely on caliber myths; instead, look at the gel-tested performance.
You’ll find that reputable defensive ammo across 9mm/.40/.45 is converging toward a similar level of pe*******on and expansion. All are trying to thread the needle: expand enough to cause damage and not over-pe*****te, yet pe*****te deep enough to reach crucial organs.
In the controlled environment of gel, they often perform very similarly within that FBI benchmark range. This highlights that handgun effectiveness is relatively limited no matter the caliber, a fact the gel tests underscore, and why shot placement, and multiple hits can matter more than a few millimeters of bullet diameter.
