RDs for Neurodiversity

  • Home
  • RDs for Neurodiversity

RDs for Neurodiversity RDs for Neurodiversity is an education platform that offers training to dietitians and professionals

How Chest/Breastfeeding Was Pathologized by Colonialism — and Then Declared “Best”another short lesson on the impacts of...
11/11/2025

How Chest/Breastfeeding Was Pathologized by Colonialism — and Then Declared “Best”another short lesson on the impacts of coloniolism on infant and child feeding

Colonialism deeply reshaped how infants and children were fed across the world. Colonialism didn’t just alter what families fed their infants — it redefined what good feeding looked like through a racialized, class-based lens.

Colonial authorities and missionaries often discouraged breastfeeding, promoting “modern” infant feeding through formula, bottles, and rigid schedules. These were marketed as symbols of progress and whiteness — distancing communities from ancestral knowledge and intergenerational care networks.

This created deep internal hierarchies within communities. Feeding became a visible marker of class and racial assimilation — a way to perform proximity to whiteness and colonial respectability. Many families, especially in urban or upwardly mobile racialized groups, abandoned traditional feeding not out of choice but out of social survival.

Meanwhile, those who continued to breast/chestfeed were portrayed as “backward,” “poor,” or “ignorant.” In many colonized nations, rural and Indigenous communities were mocked for “refusing modernity,” while the use of formula became a visible performance of compliance with colonial ideals.

Formula required safe water, sterile bottles, and consistent access to costly supplies — all of which were scarce under colonial rule. Many caregivers diluted formula to make it last longer or used contaminated water sources, leading to severe malnutrition, dehydration, and gastrointestinal infections.

Formula required safe water, sterile bottles, and consistent access to costly supplies — all of which were scarce under colonial rule. Many caregivers diluted formula to make it last longer or used contaminated water sources, leading to severe malnutrition, dehydration, and gastrointestinal infections.

Across Asia, Africa, and Latin America, infant mortality rates rose sharply as a direct result of colonial feeding campaigns. Babies became sick and died not because of a lack of love or care — but because the systems that imposed “modern feeding” ignored the material realities of colonized life.

Decades later, public health systems — largely shaped by the same colonial frameworks — reversed course, declaring breastfeeding as “best.” But even this shift often carries moral overtones, overlooking the social, economic, and systemic barriers created by colonization itself.

RDs for Neurodiversity

Indigenous peoples around the world share similar stories — their ways of feeding and nurturing families were deemed inf...
11/11/2025

Indigenous peoples around the world share similar stories — their ways of feeding and nurturing families were deemed inferior, only to have that same wisdom later appropriated, repackaged, and sold back as “scientific truth” by the very cultures that silenced it.

How Colonialism Pathologized Introducing Solids
What was once relational and community-guided was redefined as “unscientific.”

Before colonization, in many cultures, babies joined family meals when they were ready.

Feeding was guided by connection, curiosity, and community — not rigid rules.

Colonial powers called traditional feeding “dirty,” “unsafe,” or “primitive.”

Parents were told “good” caregivers followed Western timelines and products.
Feeding became moralized — and deeply tied to whiteness and control.

Generations of wisdom were dismissed.
Communities were cut off from ancestral knowledge that kept families nourished.

Now, “baby-led weaning” and “responsive feeding” are celebrated as new.
But many cultures have been practicing these approaches forever.

Reclaiming ancestral feeding is remembering that nourishment is relational, embodied, and cultural.

What was once pathologized is now praised.
Feeding wisdom never disappeared — it was silenced.
Let’s remember where it came from.

07/11/2025

We’ve created a comprehensive guide for clinicians ready to move beyond exposure-based approaches and embrace a neurodiversity-affirming framework for supporting clients with ARFID.

You can find this resource on our website under the Resources section. www.rdsforneurodiversity.com

Let’s create meaningful change — and support clients in ways that truly align with our values.

06/11/2025
Slide 1:⁣⁣Picky eating isn’t just about food — it’s about morality.⁣Over time, feeding has become a reflection of “good”...
05/11/2025

Slide 1:⁣

Picky eating isn’t just about food — it’s about morality.⁣
Over time, feeding has become a reflection of “good” or “bad” parenting.⁣

Slide 2:⁣

Once upon a time, feeding was:⁣
• Relational and communal⁣
• Guided by trust in a child’s cues⁣
• Rooted in cultural rhythms and observation⁣

Slide 3:⁣

Then came:⁣
• The rise of the parenting advice industry⁣
• A belief that feeding required expert intervention and discipline⁣

Slide 4:⁣

“Picky eating” became a moral signpost —⁣
A measure of parental success or failure,⁣
Rather than a reflection of a child’s sensory, developmental, or emotional experience.⁣

Slide 5:

What if we stopped pathologizing difference⁣
and started seeing feeding as relationship,⁣
not performance?⁣

Slide 6:Inclusive Approaches to Supporting Neurodivergent Children with Feeding Challenges⁣

It’s not too late to join!⁣

www.rdsforneurodiversity.com

Text reads: ⁣⁣A TRULY INCLUSIVE PRACTICE MEANS:⁣⁣You don’t assume “3 balanced meals” or “mindful eating” work for everyo...
29/10/2025

Text reads: ⁣

A TRULY INCLUSIVE PRACTICE MEANS:⁣

You don’t assume “3 balanced meals” or “mindful eating” work for everyone.⁣

You understand that interoceptive and sensory differences can shape eating patterns.⁣

You prioritize autonomy and accommodations and challenge compliance-based practices.⁣

Embracing Neurodiversity and Weight-Inclusivity: Creating Supportive & Inclusive Practices 2-Part Course⁣

learn at your own pace⁣

watch the replay ⁣

https://rdsforneurodiversitycourses.podia.com/embracing-neurodiversity-and-weight-inclusivity-creating-supportive-and-inclusive-practices

Inclusive Approaches to Supporting Neurodivergent Children with Feeding Challenges is a program open to clinicians from ...
18/10/2025

Inclusive Approaches to Supporting Neurodivergent Children with Feeding Challenges is a program open to clinicians
from diverse backgrounds who want to deepen their understanding of neuroaffirming approaches to ARFID.
Starting Thursday!

A Neuroaffirming Approach to ARFID: Rethinking Mainstream Norms
Mainstream Approach

Limited recognition of sensory needs

Emphasizes culturally constructed “norms” of “good” eating behavior

Compliance-driven approach with predefined progress goals

Uses fear-based tactics to encourage change and blames the individual

Views supplement use as a sign of failure

Pathologizes preferred foods

Focused on arbitrary, outdated “gold standards”

Neuro-affirming Approach

Focuses on sensory needs and prioritizes sensory health

Challenges neuronormativity in eating behaviors

Supports individual autonomy to define personal progress

Addresses systemic barriers to eating and advocates for accommodations

Considers supplements as a form of accommodation

Respects preferred foods as a source of nourishment

Prioritizes lived experience and unbiased research

The current narratives around the “causes” of autism only create more fear for parents. I can’t imagine the amount of gu...
16/10/2025

The current narratives around the “causes” of autism only create more fear for parents.

I can’t imagine the amount of guilt so many must carry when simply treating a fever or managing pain, wondering if they’re somehow causing autism in their children.

Imagine the number of babies who will suffer in pain, denied necessary medication because of the fear of “causing” autism.

It’s often autistic children — those with interoceptive differences and heightened sensations of pain and discomfort — who need these medications the most.

Autistic people have always existed — and will always exist. Instead of imagining a so-called perfect world without us, imagine how much better the world could be if efforts were focused on supporting us rather than trying to eradicate us.

RDs for Neurodiversity

Our pediatric program starts next week! ⁣⁣Alt text: Guiding Questions for Clinicians to Support a Flexible and Individua...
13/10/2025

Our pediatric program starts next week! ⁣

Alt text: Guiding Questions for Clinicians to Support a Flexible and Individualized Approach to ARFID⁣

Am I defining success based on a neurotypical standard? → Or am I centering the child’s unique needs, comfort, and autonomy in their feeding journey?⁣

Am I prioritizing safety over food expansion? → Or am I unintentionally pushing variety as the main marker of progress?⁣

Am I defining progress in ways that truly feel supportive → Or am I unintentionally imposing neuronormative feeding norms about what “better” eating should look like?⁣

True support isn’t about “fixing” how a child eats—it’s about creating a relationship with food that feels safe, accessible, and affirming.⁣

When supporting neurodivergent children with ARFID, our work must be anchored in their lived and embodied eating experie...
12/10/2025

When supporting neurodivergent children with ARFID, our work must be anchored in their lived and embodied eating experiences—not in neuronormative feeding frameworks rooted in ableist assumptions about what eating “should” look like.

Too often, feeding frameworks and models in our profession are centered on the experiences of non-disabled and “typicall...
08/10/2025

Too often, feeding frameworks and models in our profession are centered on the experiences of non-disabled and “typically” developing children. The feeding experiences and challenges of neurodivergent children and families are frequently excluded from feeding
and nutrition research.

As a result, many clinicians feel ill-equipped to support clients whose eating does not fit into neuronormative expectations of what a feeding journey “should” look like. This course reframes feeding differences through a neurodivergent perspective, emphasizing
acceptance, skill-building, advocacy, accommodation, and solutions that feel affirming and supportive.

Alt text
Inclusive Approaches to Supporting Neurodivergent Children with Feeding Challenges & ARFID
Approved for 20 CPEUs
Starting October 23rd
www.rdsforneurodiversity.com

Address


Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when RDs for Neurodiversity posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to RDs for Neurodiversity:

  • Want your practice to be the top-listed Clinic?

Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest Share on Reddit Share via Email
Share on WhatsApp Share on Instagram Share on Telegram