04/12/2025
https://www.facebook.com/share/1Fp64JZnP6/?mibextid=wwXIfr
โThe greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are treated.โ ~Mahatma Gandhi
Across the horse world, many harmful behaviours are still justified with one familiar line: โThat is how horses correct each other in the herd.โ It sounds convincing, but it collapses under scientific, behavioural and ethical scrutiny. Horses are sentient beings with complex emotional and physiological lives, and the way we interact with them has profound consequences for their safety, learning and long-term wellbeing.
Before we go further, it is important to define what we mean by violence. Violence refers to actions that cause harm, fear or overwhelm, such as hitting, yanking, striking, intimidating, or using tools and equipment to force compliance. This is distinct from clear, proportional pressure, which can be a natural part of equine communication when used ethically with immediate release, clarity and emotional neutrality.
Violence is not leadership. It is not communication. It is not education. It is a breakdown of skill, regulation and attunement. Horses do not learn through fear. They survive it.
This conversation is not about attacking individuals or shaming people for methods they were taught. It is about evolving our understanding so that both horses and humans can experience safer, more conscious and more connected relationships.
Let us dispel the myth that โHorses Do It To Each Otherโ
It is true that horses in the wild sometimes escalate to physical contact. However, this happens in very specific contexts and with very different rules to human behaviour.
In stable, well-regulated herds with adequate space and resources, most communication happens through subtle signals:
Breath patterns
Tension or release in the fascia
Posture and body organisation
Eye expression
Ears and orientation
Intention and energetic shifts
Weight distribution
Physical escalation becomes more common only when herds are stressed, unstable, overcrowded, lacking resources or socially mismatched. Even then, it is brief, proportionate and immediately followed by return to baseline. Horses do not inflict prolonged or repeated harm, nor do they punish.
Comparing human-inflicted force to herd behaviour is inaccurate for several reasons:
Humans are not horses and do not speak the same somatic language.
Human actions often lack the clarity and congruence horses need to understand intent.
Tools such as bits, leverage devices and restrictive tack introduce forces that horses never experience from their own species.
Human violence is often accompanied by emotional volatility, which horses register as unpredictable threat.
Domestic environments create chronic stressors that do not exist in natural herds.
A mare correcting a foal is not the same as a human striking a horse. One is a species-specific interaction embedded in millions of years of evolutionary context. The other is a misapplication of power.
So what does violence actually do to a horse?
Horses are prey animals with nervous systems designed to detect threat and ensure survival. Their neuroception scans constantly for cues of safety or danger. When humans introduce force, several predictable neurobiological responses occur.
Sympathetic activation
Heart rate rises, the fascia stiffens, muscles brace and the horse prepares for flight or defence. This is not the same as โattitudeโ or โnaughtinessโ. It is the body preparing to survive.
Dorsal collapse
If escape is impossible, the horse may drop into shutdown. This looks like quietness or compliance, but it is a freeze pattern. The horse is not calm. It is immobilised.
Impaired learning
The brain cannot learn new information effectively under threat. When cortisol and adrenaline rise, higher cognitive functions switch off. The horse is no longer processing. It is reacting.
Disrupted tensegrity
Violence disrupts the tensegrity system, creating bracing patterns, compensatory posture and long-term biomechanical stress. Movement becomes defensive rather than expressive.
Trauma patterning
Repeated threat forms lasting neural associations. The horse begins to anticipate harm, becomes hypervigilant, shuts down or develops conflict behaviours often mislabelled as stubbornness.
Breakdown of trust
Trust is not lost through a single moment. It is lost through inconsistency, unpredictability and emotional incongruence in the human. Horses read tension in our bodies long before they react to our cues.
Violence does not communicate clarity. It communicates danger.
An important one to go into: Pressure versus punishment and the essential distinction.
Horses absolutely use pressure in their natural communication. It is part of how they navigate space, boundaries and cooperative movement.
Pressure in ethical horsemanship is:
Clear
Proportionate
Neutral
Predictable
Immediately released when the horse offers a response
Punishment, on the other hand, is:
Delayed
Emotionally charged
Escalatory
Confusing
Painful
Threatening
Applied after the horse is already overwhelmed
Ethical pressure helps communication. Violence destroys it.
Let's talk about co-regulation and why the human's state matters more than technique. A crucial layer missing from traditional horsemanship is the recognition that horses co-regulate with us. Their nervous system reads:
Our breathing
Our tension
Our posture
Our energy
Our emotional tone
Our level of presence
They synchronise to the physiology of whoever they are with to such a degree that it can feel as though they are borrowing the human nervous system. This is not literal neural sharing, but a powerful biological response designed for social species.
A dysregulated human cannot regulate a horse.
A braced human cannot soften a horse.
An anxious human cannot create safety.
When humans are overwhelmed or reactive, force becomes the default because choice has collapsed. Violence is often not cruelty. It is dysregulation.
There are rare situations where immediate physical action is needed to prevent serious harm. Pulling a horse out of a dangerous situation is not violence. Moving a horse quickly during an emergency is not violence.
Violence refers to force used as training, discipline or communication rather than momentary protective intervention.
This distinction matters.
True leadership in herds does not come from aggression. It comes from regulation. The horses who lead are those who remain steady under pressure, who move first, who offer predictability and who act in the best interest of the group.
Human leadership with horses requires the same qualities:
Emotional steadiness
Somatic consistency
Clear intention
Congruence between inner state and outer actions
Ability to stay regulated when the horse is not
Leadership is not about control. It is about creating enough safety that the horse wants to follow.
Horses learn best when they feel safe enough to choose participation. Consent-based horsemanship is not permissive. It is intelligent, relational and rooted in understanding how learning actually occurs.
Consent creates:
Regulation
Postural integrity
Fluid movement
Genuine connection
Better retention
Improved problem-solving
Greater willingness
When horses feel safe, their brains release oxytocin, dopamine and endorphins that support learning and cooperation. When they feel threatened, the opposite occurs.
Safety builds ability. Fear builds survival.
Many behaviours labelled as disrespect, dominance or stubbornness are actually expressions of unmet needs or dysregulated states. These include:
Pain
Poor saddle fit
Dental issues
Lack of movement
Isolation
Insecure attachment patterns
Conflicting cues
Overwhelm
Social stress
Environmental restriction
Sensory overload
Stored trauma
Behaviour is information. Violence ignores the message and punishes the messenger.
As humans we have a responsibility to acknowledge and understand this all, in order to be better with our horses.
Every interaction between a horse and a human is shaped primarily by the humanโs internal state. Horses read us before they respond to us. If we want regulated horses, we must first become regulated humans.
We cannot ask for softness while we are bracing.
We cannot ask for trust when our body communicates threat.
We cannot ask for partnership when our physiology is in conflict.
This is the foundation of conscious horsemanship.
Imagine an equestrian world where:
Training prioritises safety rather than survival
Consent is considered a core skill
Education includes nervous system literacy
Riders learn emotional intelligence alongside technique
Horses enter work regulated rather than braced
Behaviour is investigated rather than suppressed
Relationships are built on attunement rather than domination
This vision is not idealistic. It is achievable when we are willing to evolve.
How we treat horses reflects who we are and who we are becoming. Each moment is an opportunity to choose understanding over reaction, clarity over force and connection over control.
The horse is not asking for perfection.
They are asking for safety.
They are asking for consistency.
They are asking for humanity.
In every interaction, the question becomes:
Will you choose fear or understanding?
Control or communication?
Old patterns or conscious evolution?
The horse is waiting for your answer.
So is the future of horsemanship.
