Jamax Forest Solutions

Jamax Forest Solutions Forestry consultant: "we can see the forest through the trees!" Jamax Forest Solutions' principal is Steve Dobbyns.

Jamax Forest Solutions provides independent expert native forest and plantation management and forestry consultancy services, with expertise in:
• native forest and plantation management,
• harvest planning and supervision,
• haulage operations and logistics,
• domestic and export sales and marketing,
• timber procurement
• project management,
• multi-value property management,
• bushfire prevention and mitigation. As a professional forestry consultant, Jamax Forest Solutions is focused on providing high-quality service and customer satisfaction - we will do everything we can to meet your expectations. Steve has extensive experience at a senior level in public and private sector forest management, with:

• 32 years experience in native forest and plantation management,
• 28 years experience in planning and supervising harvesting operations,
• 26 years experience in sales and marketing on the NSW north coast,
• 20 years experience in harvesting and haulage contract management,
• 5 years experience in export log sales and marketing
• 2 years experience managing the Northern Regions Aerial Photography Interpretation Unit; and
13 years as an independent forestry consultant.

With the rise of clean energy, scientists have been searching for ways to design cheaper, safer, and more sustainable ba...
27/01/2026

With the rise of clean energy, scientists have been searching for ways to design cheaper, safer, and more sustainable batteries.

German researchers have come up with a promising solution: making batteries from by-products of the wood industry.

A team at Germany's Fraunhofer Institute for Ceramic Technologies and Systems (IKTS) has developed a new type of sodium-ion battery that uses lignin as a key electrode material.

Feral animals and the cessation of Indigenous burning are the biggest cause of mammal extinctions in Australia. Not logg...
26/01/2026

Feral animals and the cessation of Indigenous burning are the biggest cause of mammal extinctions in Australia. Not logging, not mining, not anything else!

Decades of evidence link foxes and feral cats with extinctions of Australian mammals. Claims these introduced predators aren’t responsible don’t stack up.

Sounds crazy but here you go........Gophers on mission to save a mountainIn 1980, Washington State’s Mount St Helens eru...
23/01/2026

Sounds crazy but here you go........

Gophers on mission to save a mountain

In 1980, Washington State’s Mount St Helens erupted, resulting in 57 human deaths, the most ever recorded for a volcanic eruption in the US, and the deaths of thousands of animals in the area. Source: IFL Science

As well as the human tragedy, the eruption caused an ecological nightmare as the volcano spewed lava, ash, and debris over the surrounding landscape. The avalanche was followed by mudflows and pyroclastic flows, leaving the vegetation covered in mud and detritus as far as 27 kilometres from the volcano.

It was clear from the start that recovery would take decades. But one team of scientists had an unconventional idea to help jumpstart the process: send a few gophers on a one-day mission to the mountain. So, why gophers?

“Gophers are known as ‘fossorial species,’ meaning ‘hole diggers’,” a team studying the effects of this excursion wrote in a 2024 paper assessing the long-term effects of the rodents at Mount St Helens, adding, “a single gopher can move 227 kg [500 pounds] of soil per month, with gopher populations translocating 38,000 kg [83,780 pounds] of soil per acre per year”.

Digging, it turns out, is a pretty useful quality in restoring an area devastated by volcanic eruption. Plant life was struggling to return to Mount St Helens as it was now under a layer of pumice fragments. But while the top layers of soil were destroyed by the eruption and lava flows, the soil underneath could still have been rich in bacteria and fungi.

“Soil microorganisms regulate nutrient cycling, interact with many other organisms, and therefore may support successional pathways and complementary ecosystem functions, even in harsh conditions,” the researchers explained in their paper.

“With the exception of a few weeds, there is no way most plant roots are efficient enough to get all the nutrients and water they need by themselves,” explained study co-author University of California Riverside microbiologist Michael Allen, in a statement. “The fungi transport these things to the plant and get carbon they need for their own growth in exchange.”

After the eruption, researchers believed gophers could be ideal for returning it all to the top, promoting new plant growth.

“They’re often considered pests, but we thought they would take old soil, move it to the surface, and that would be where recovery would occur,” Mr Allen said.

Two years after the eruption of Mount St Helens, local gophers were sent on a rather confusing day trip to the area, which must have been a little baffling to the animals, even if they weren’t aware of the recent eruption. In position, the gophers were placed in enclosed areas for the experiment and spent the day happily digging around in the pumice.

Despite only spending one day in the area, the impact was remarkable. Six years after their trip, there were over 40,000 plants thriving where the gophers had gotten to work, while the surrounding land remained, for the most part, barren. Studying the area over 40 years later, the team found they had left one hell of a legacy.

“Plots with historic gopher activity harboured more diverse bacterial and fungal communities than the surrounding old-growth forests,” they wrote. “We also found more diverse fungal communities in these long-term lupine gopher plots than in forests that were historically clearcut, prior to the 1980 eruption, nearby at Bear Meadow.”

“In the 1980s, we were just testing the short-term reaction,” Mr Allen said. “Who would have predicted you could toss a gopher in for a day and see a residual effect 40 years later?”

While the gophers should be praised for their unusual part in the story, the real stars of the recovery effort are the far-less-cutesy fungi. After the eruption, scientists worried that nearby pine and spruce forests would take a long time to recover, as the ash covered their needles, causing them to fall off. However, they regrew much more quickly than expected, thanks to our fungal friends.

“These trees have their own mycorrhizal fungi that picked up nutrients from the dropped needles and helped fuel rapid tree regrowth,” UCR environmental microbiologist and paper co-author Emma Aronson added. “The trees came back almost immediately in some places. It didn’t all die like everyone thought.”

Comparing the forest to a nearby forest that had recently been cut, thus being devoid of the layer of needles, they found stark differences.

“There still isn’t much of anything growing in the clearcut area,” Mr Aronson said. “It was shocking looking at the old growth forest soil and comparing it to the dead area.”

While the forest just metres away was incinerated, the raining embers extinguished when they reached the fresh grasses t...
21/01/2026

While the forest just metres away was incinerated, the raining embers extinguished when they reached the fresh grasses that had grown back after the cultural burn.

"Where we burned, didn't get scorched," Peter Dixon said.

"The canopies were still alive, the ground wasn't cooked to bare soil, and that helped the RFS push the fire downhill, away from houses."

Insurance has been a major stumbling block to the scaling up of cultural burning, but a breakthrough could be on the way.

Studies suggest paper ads are more environmentally responsibleIn a surprising turn, recent studies suggest that paper-ba...
20/01/2026

Studies suggest paper ads are more environmentally responsible

In a surprising turn, recent studies suggest that paper-based advertising may hold a more sustainable footprint than its digital counterpart. This revelation challenges the widely held assumption that ‘going paperless’ automatically equates to environmental responsibility. Source: Archyworldys – The Global Pulse https://www.archyworldys.com/

New data indicates that the full lifecycle impact of digital advertising – encompassing data centers, device manufacturing, and network infrastructure – generates a significantly larger carbon footprint than traditional print methods.

The findings, originating from research conducted by the Öko-Institut in Germany and corroborated by analyses from The Telegraph, Emerce, and RetailTrends, highlight the often-overlooked environmental costs associated with the digital world. While paper production undeniably carries its own environmental burdens, advancements in sustainable forestry practices and paper recycling are mitigating these impacts.

The environmental impact of digital advertising isn’t immediately apparent. It’s easy to assume that an email or online banner ad has a negligible effect, but the reality is far more complex. Consider the energy consumption of massive data centres required to store and deliver online content. These facilities, often powered by fossil fuels, contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions.

Furthermore, the manufacturing of the devices we use to access digital advertising – smartphones, laptops, tablets – requires the extraction of rare earth minerals and involves energy-intensive production processes. The relatively short lifespan of these devices, coupled with the growing problem of electronic waste, exacerbates the environmental burden.

Conversely, the paper industry has made substantial strides in sustainability. Responsible forestry management ensures that trees are replanted, maintaining forest ecosystems and biodiversity. Modern paper mills utilize renewable energy sources and implement closed-loop water systems to minimize their environmental impact.

Crucially, paper is a highly recyclable material, with established infrastructure for collection and reprocessing.

The Öko-Institut’s research specifically examined the carbon footprint of various advertising channels, factoring in everything from raw material extraction to end-of-life disposal. Their findings consistently showed that paper-based advertising, particularly when utilizing recycled paper and responsible forestry practices, generated fewer greenhouse gas emissions than comparable digital campaigns. The Telegraph provides a detailed overview of these findings.

But does this mean we should abandon digital advertising altogether? Not necessarily. The key lies in optimizing digital campaigns for efficiency and utilizing renewable energy sources to power data centres.

Further research from Emerce and KVGO reinforces the notion that a holistic assessment of environmental impact is crucial.

The debate extends beyond carbon emissions. The production of electronic devices relies on conflict minerals, raising ethical concerns about labour practices and environmental degradation in mining regions. RetailTrends highlights the growing consumer demand for transparency and sustainable practices in all aspects of the supply chain.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Does this mean paper advertising is *always* better for the environment?

A: Not necessarily. The sustainability of paper advertising depends heavily on factors like responsible forestry practices, the use of recycled paper, and efficient transportation. If these factors aren’t considered, the environmental benefits can be diminished.

Q: What about the convenience of digital advertising? Is that a factor in its continued use?

A: Convenience is a significant driver of digital advertising’s popularity. However, it’s important to weigh that convenience against the environmental costs. Optimizing digital campaigns for efficiency can help mitigate some of those costs.

Q: How can businesses make their paper advertising more sustainable?

A: Businesses can prioritize using recycled paper, sourcing from sustainably managed forests (look for certifications like FSC), and minimizing waste in the printing process. They can also encourage customers to recycle printed materials.

Q: What role does the energy source powering data centers play in the environmental impact of digital advertising?

A: The energy source is critical. Data centers powered by renewable energy sources (solar, wind, hydro) have a significantly lower carbon footprint than those relying on fossil fuels.

Q: Are there any certifications or standards that consumers can look for to identify sustainable paper products?

A: Yes, the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification is a widely recognized standard that ensures paper products come from responsibly managed forests. Other certifications include the Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI).

This research prompts a critical re-evaluation of our assumptions about environmental sustainability in the advertising industry. It’s a reminder that seemingly ‘green’ choices can have hidden consequences, and that a truly sustainable approach requires a comprehensive lifecycle assessment.

Proposals sought to support farm forestry and agroforestryForestry Australia is seeking proposals for projects that will...
19/01/2026

Proposals sought to support farm forestry and agroforestry

Forestry Australia is seeking proposals for projects that will support farm forestry and agroforestry in Australia. The funding is made available through the Forestry Australia’s Grower Reserve Fund, with up to $10,000 available per project. Source: Timberbiz

Applications for projects supported from the Grower Reserve Fund will be considered according to the following principles:

* Clearly promoting the interests of private growers and advocating for improvements in legislation, policy, codes of practice and other instruments that affect tree growing and private forestry.

* Encouraging interaction and communication between members and the development of expanded networks.

* Enabling growth in grower membership of Forestry Australia.

* Being accessible to a broad range of members, while recognising the need to cater for diversity in regional settings and grower interests throughout Australia.

* Providing longevity of benefit to members by making information available through stable and secure platforms such as websites, searchable databases and bibliographies.

* Opportunities to maintain and grow the fund will be pursued to the extent that resources allow and where these are consistent with the principles of Forestry Australia.

The Grower Reserve Fund will generally not be used to cover expenses that could reasonably be expected to be met from other sources – e.g. catering or food costs for meetings and events that can be recouped via an event cover charge.

Proposals will be evaluated by the Forestry Australia Grower Committee and Board on the basis of the following selection criteria:

* Demonstrated experience and expertise in Farm Forestry

* Outcomes and value of the project to forest growers

* Capacity to deliver

* Demonstrated understanding of the reserve fund criteria.


A proposal of no more than four pages should include the following elements:

* A project plan that includes:
* Details of the project
* Its expected outcomes and deliverables
* Key dates
* How it links to the reserve fund purpose

* A detailed budget including a proposed schedule for the release of the funds.

* Key personnel involved in the project. Will the project be undertaken by a company, organisation or individual?

* Declarations of interest

* A statement that endorses your commitment to Forestry Australia’s Code of Conduct

* Will public liability insurance be covered by the applicant? Noting that Forestry Australia Branch activities are covered by Forestry Australia’s public liability insurance

Forestry Australia’s Board will approve all projects and Forestry Australia’s Grower Committee will consider and provide oversight to all projects.

A final project report including budget expenditure will be required at the conclusion of the Project, with brief written progress updates provided to the Grower Committee every quarter.

The submission deadline is Monday 2 February 2026 and should be sent to growers@forestry.org.au

For information or queries please contact Lauren Hayward at growers@forestry.org.au

The NSW government’s environmental department very quietly announced the results of their Statewide “baseline” koala sur...
19/01/2026

The NSW government’s environmental department very quietly announced the results of their Statewide “baseline” koala survey before Xmas and estimated that there are 274,000 koalas in NSW (with a 95% confidence interval). That’s 8 times as many as when they were listed as endangered.

They would have known this before their disastrous GKNP announcement on Father’s Day. Yet, Environment Minister Penny Sharpe MLC still clings to the idea that koalas are endangered in order to justify the destruction of the timber industry, regional jobs, regional communities and future conservation decisions.

The Great Koala National Park is an economic mirage built on misinformation.

It’s astonishing how easily people swallow the glossy promises that come with political pet projects like the proposed Great Koala National Park.

Let’s start with the supposed “environmental” justification. The entire case rests on false claims that koalas are in crisis. Yet, the latest CSIRO report shows koala numbers are double what the NSW Government and the Greens have been telling us. And Dr Brad Law’s long-term research clearly demonstrates that koalas are thriving in State Forests — the very areas now being sacrificed to create this bureaucratic empire.

So if the premise is flawed, what does that say about the “economic benefits”? Well, they’re also pure spin.

The Government claims “$60 million investment” as if that money magically appears. It doesn’t, it’s taxpayer money being funnelled into another bloated bureaucracy. And let’s not forget the $80 million already promised. That’s $140 million of public funds to build walking tracks, campgrounds, and “cultural camps” in forests already freely accessible.

Meanwhile, State Forests operate far more efficiently per hectare than National Parks. The National Parks and Wildlife Service already struggles to manage its existing estate, where invasive weeds, feral animals and wildfire fuel loads are rampant. Yet we’re told another park will somehow “boost the economy”?

And as for eco-tourism, koalas have been in these forests throughout European settlement. No one has ever flocked here in droves to see them. Why would they start now? The fantasy of “eco-tourism millions” is marketing fluff, pie in the sky, designed to sell a policy that can’t stand on its environmental or financial merits.

This is about political theatre, headline grabbing and appeasing inner-city activists who wouldn’t know a eucalypt from a camphor laurel.

And right now, the government is calling for feedback on a recreational survey for the park. Why not tell them what we really think?

If governments really cared about regional economies, they’d support the industries that have sustainably managed these forests for decades, and not destroy them under a false banner of “conservation”.

16/01/2026
Beautiful timber!!
15/01/2026

Beautiful timber!!

Love this home’s look?
The deck, the posts, the screening — it’s all Ironwood.
If you’re planning a build or upgrade, come see what premium timber can do for your project.
Quality you can see. Strength you can trust.

15/01/2026

With feral horses gone, fragile alpine areas are no longer being trampled by hard hooves. But Kosciuszko’s landscapes will take decades to recover.

A new study has revealed that bark microbes feed off harmful greenhouse gases.The microbes studied eliminated different ...
15/01/2026

A new study has revealed that bark microbes feed off harmful greenhouse gases.

The microbes studied eliminated different gases, depending on whether they lived in wetland, mangrove, or upland forests.

The scientists plan to turn their attention to other types of trees to find out which species host the most active gas-consuming bark microbes.

"Knowing how much, and which trees do this best, might inform management or different conservation or forestry processes in maximising what trees can do in terms of cleaning the air," Dr Jeffrey said.

Tiny, gas-eating microbes hidden in the bark of trees offer scientists a crucial clue in the fight against global warming.

15/01/2026

Beautiful

Address

45 Koree Island Road
Beechwood, NSW
2446

Opening Hours

Monday 7am - 7pm
Tuesday 7am - 7pm
Wednesday 7am - 7pm
Thursday 7am - 7pm
Friday 7am - 7pm
Saturday 8am - 6pm
Sunday 8am - 6pm

Telephone

+61427990317

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Jamax Forest Solutions posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest Share on Reddit Share via Email
Share on WhatsApp Share on Instagram Share on Telegram