20/11/2025
AUSTRALIAN MOTHER'S, BE ON ALERT: Shadow Feminine Energies Are Targeting Our Young Men.
Australian Mother's have been told to Lock up their Son's BECAUSE Two of the biggest female predators have hit our Australian shores to sleep with your barely legal Son's.. 💯💯💯Scenario: A Mother’s Son Gets Caught in the Web of a Shadow Feminine Predator!
Samantha, a single mum of a 17-turning-18-year-old boy named Liam, has always known her son is kind, quiet, deeply sensitive, and still forming his sense of identity.
Liam just turned 18 two months ago. He goes to the Gold Coast with his mates for a weekend..nothing wild, just celebration and freedom. That same weekend, a well-known adult content creator lands in the area, publicly posting that she’s “looking for barely legal boys to film with. Her energy is magnetic, a mix of confidence, seduction, and deliberate targeting. She knows exactly what type of young man she can pull into her field: inexperienced, eager to impress, vulnerable, biologically impulsive, wanting validation, unaware of energetic consequences and karmic soul contracts. Liam, scrolling social media, sees she’s nearby. His friends hype him up, telling him it would “make him a legend.” He meets her at a bar. She acts glamorous, older, confident, complimentary.
She tells him he’s handsome, special, mature. No one his age has ever said anything like that to him before. His nervous system floods with:dopamine, validation, s*xual curiosity, masculine pride, the desire to be chosen..
She takes him back to her hotel. He’s sober, consenting, but overwhelmed and confused. She records everything with release forms he barely reads. To her, it’s content.
To him, it’s his first intimate experience. The next morning, Liam feels: Used, Confused and Ashamed.. not sure if he should feel proud or violated, worried his mother will be disappointed.. Unsure what this means about his identity or worth And.... Within 48 hours, the video appears online.
People at school see it. His friends tease him. Others s*xualise him. Girls treat him differently. He loses innocence he never realised he had. He becomes withdrawn. His confidence drops. He spirals into thinking this is what intimacy should look like: fast, filmed, performative, disconnected... When Samantha finally finds out, she doesn’t get angry, she just feels her heart crack. She sees a light in her son has dimmed. Not because of s*x, but because of energetic consumption. The woman involved goes on with her career. For her, it was one of hundreds. But for Liam, it becomes a defining imprint on his masculine psyche: Insecurity, Pressure, Sexual confusion, Unwanted online exposure, Difficulty forming healthy emotional bonds, a sense of being hunted, not chosen. Samantha realises this wasn’t divine feminine influence. It was shadow Dark feminine predation: Feeding off youthful energy, Gamour masking hunger, Seduction used as extraction, Power imbalance disguised as “consent”, She doesn’t blame her son but she sees clearly that he was targeted. And she vows to warn other mothers so their children don’t get spiritually, emotionally, or energetically pulled into the same trap.
Why This Is Legally OK in Many Cases? But Still Raises Ethical Concerns..
Age of Consent Laws - In Australia, the age of consent is 16 in most states / territories. Because many of the “barely legal” people targeted are 18-year-olds, they are legally adults. That means, strictly from a consent-of-age viewpoint, it’s not automatically illegal (assuming no other abuse or coercion). That said, even if it's legal, grooming or exploitative behavior can still be a concern under other laws or ethical frameworks.
Government / PM Role -
The Prime Minister (and more broadly, the federal government) doesn’t necessarily “allow” things just because a controversial adult content creator shows up there are visa laws, immigration checks, and public safety / child protection concerns. In Bonnie Blue’s case, her visa was cancelled, which indicates the government maybe did take action. (But other sources say - She's already here!) Whether the government should do more (regulate influencer s*x work targeting young adults, change age-of-consent laws, etc.) is a matter of public debate, not purely a “they allowed it” situation.
What About Their Mental / Psychological State?
We don’t have definitive proof that Bonnie Blue or Lily Phillips have specific “mental illness” diagnoses (like a psychiatric disorder) — at least not from credible public sources. However, their public behavior does raise serious psychological / emotional questions:
For Lily: pushing herself to extremes (“100 men in a day”), describing disassociation, crying — these could indicate emotional stress, burnout, or deeper issues, but that's speculation unless she shares a formal diagnosis. For Bonnie: her framing of her behavior as “teaching” or “empowering” could be part of a performative brand. Her repeated focus on “barely legal” might be a business model more than a clinical issue.
It's possible these are not purely “mental illness” but rather high-risk, high-stress business strategies combined with boundary-pushing for shock value and attention (which in the adult content world can be very profitable).
Why This Situation Is So Complex and Troubling???
Power Dynamics: Even if participants are 18, they may be young, inexperienced, and impressionable. There’s a significant power imbalance when a well-known adult performer “recruits” them.
Long-Term Consequences: Content created with young adults (especially “schoolies” fresh-outs) might affect their lives — careers, mental health, regrets later.
Normalization Risks: Some worry that this glamorizes “barely legal” as a niche, potentially normalizing relationships with big age gaps in young adulthood.
Regulation & Enforcement: Immigration law (visa cancelation) is one lever. But regulating online s*x work, consent, and exploitation is harder, especially internationally.
Public Safety: Even if someone is “consenting,” if they’re manipulated or poorly informed, there’s risk — especially when filming, publicizing, and monetizing these acts.
My Take 💯
Yes, there is something very troubling going on especially ethically. But it's not as simple as “the prime minister is just letting predators run wild.” There are existing laws, and in at least one high-profile case, the government acted (visa cancelation). Whether this is about mental health, business exploitation, or shock-chasing is probably a mix. It’s not clearly one or the other. It’s a situation that probably needs more public scrutiny, not just moral outrage: regulation of adult content, protections for young adults entering the industry, better support for people doing stunt s*x work, and maybe rethinking how we define “exploitation.” Australia has very strong visa powers. The Department of Home Affairs can cancel a visa if: the visitor is performing work they’re not approved for, their presence is “not in the public interest”, they are involved in activities that risk exploitation of young people (which is exactly this 💯), they pose a reputational or moral risk to Australia. THE SHADOW DARK FEMININE IS HUNTING for “Barely Legal” Energy — Stand Guard!!!!
Enforce age-of-consent and grooming laws, Even though 18-year-olds are adults, grooming laws can still apply if there is: manipulation, coercion, exploitation, power imbalance used to gain s*xual access, if there was evidence of: intoxicated participants, faked consent, pressure, minors being targeted online beforehand police could intervene. But current cases usually involve 18-year-olds who volunteer, so the law doesn't automatically apply.
Regulate filming, commercial s*x work, and content creation. Australia has laws about: performing s*x work without a license (varies by state), filming adult content without proper permits, making money on a visa that doesn't allow work, distributing explicit content, public indecency, (Many OnlyFans creators don’t realise these laws apply to them.) if authorities want to, they can penalise creators for: unlicensed s*x work, filming content in hotels, Airbnbs, or public spaces, not having proper contracts and breaching visa terms.
What the Government Cannot Legally Do
✘ They cannot ban adult women from having s*x with 18-year-olds, Once someone is 18, the law sees them as fully adult. Even if the relationship is: inappropriate, morally wrong, predatory, exploitative…it is still legal unless it crosses into grooming or coercion. The government cannot ban: big age gaps, "legal but creepy” relationships, adults having s*x with adults.
✘ They cannot diagnose or judge mental illness, The government can’t label someone mentally ill unless: a medical professional assesses them, they pose a danger, they are committing crime. Content creators doing shocking or extreme things for money is not a mental-illness diagnosis in the eyes of the law.
Even if public thinks: “she’s unstable” “she has trauma”
"she must be mentally unwell”…that is not grounds for legal action.
What the Government COULD CHANGE to Stop This in the Future! Below is what realistic policy changes could look like if Australia wanted to clamp down hard on this kind of behaviour:🔺 Option A: A specific law banning s*xual content creators from events like Schoolies
Just like: teachers, photographers, youth workers are banned from certain youth spaces. A law could define:
Schoolies zones, youth-restricted events, adult-content workers prohibited from attending in a work capacity
This would instantly stop situations like Bonnie Blue targeting “barely legal boys in a party zone.”🔺 Option B: Mandatory licensing for all adult content creators in Australia. This already exists in NSW and Victoria partially, but it could be expanded nationwide: background checks, health and safety requirements, age verification laws, restrictions on interacting with 18–19-year-olds if you're an adult entertainer.🔺 Option C: Stricter visa categories for online adult entertainers
Australia could require: special visas, strict behavioural conditions, bans on filming with young locals, bans on attending youth-heavy events, reporting requirements..
This would stop foreign creators from flying in just to create “shock content.”🔺 Option D: Expand grooming laws to cover “barely legal” predatory targeting, This would be controversial, but possible. Define “predatory targeting of newly-legal adults” as: Deliberate hunting,
manipulation, monetization of inexperienced adults, s*xual pressure for monetized content. This would recognise the power imbalance, even between adults.
🧠 So… what mental conditions are involved?
We cannot diagnose these women, but patterns seen in extreme s*xual performers often include: Narcissistic traits, High risk-taking behaviour, Trauma-driven s*xual expression, Dissociation under pressure (Lily Phillips admitted this), Validation-seeking, Hypers*xual coping mechanisms, Commercialisation of self-worth. None of these are official diagnoses — but they are common behavioural patterns in s*x-industry psychology. Child and young adult s*xual exploitation is abhorrent sadly and it's also the world's fastest growing major crime.
PLEASE SHARE THIS POST IF YOUR A MOTHER or FATHER WHO AGREE'S IN PROTECTING OUR CHILDREN AND YOUNG ADULTS FROM THESE PREDATORY SEXUAL SHOCK VALUE STUNTS AND PERFORMERS
