04/11/2025
💯 agree Lamaze Australia. Very proud to be a Lamaze Certified Childbirth Educator as well as a Certified Postpartum Doula.
Lamaze Australia's response to the recent statement issued by RANZCOG and ACM regarding freebirths and doulas.
(https://midwives.org.au/Web/News-media-releases/Articles/2025/03_November/Jooint_Call_Health_Ministers_End_Freebirth_Deaths.aspx?fbclid=IwdGRjcAN1T0xleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHgHeqS3NVt6yc3hUxY2oE_ZzIWPR3RQRUJ6czjfQrApSZDdCTGbMLstCrI0C_aem_Wp82Fuwdc37aBYOtg_QJTg)
When Women Die in Childbirth, Blame Fails Us. Listening Might Save Lives.
The recent tragic deaths of several Australian women and babies following freebirths have rightly ignited grief and concern across the nation. Any maternal or neonatal death is heartbreaking, and communities affected by these losses deserve compassion and support.
However, calls to criminalise doulas or restrict freebirth represent a deeply troubling response. They threaten to undermine women’s reproductive autonomy, fail to address the systemic drivers pushing some women away from mainstream maternity care, and risk repeating a historic pattern: when women suffer, the instinct is to police them rather than listen to them.
Women’s Autonomy Is Not Optional
Whether one agrees with freebirth or not is immaterial. At the heart of this issue lies a fundamental principle: women have the right to bodily autonomy. This includes the right to decide where, how, and with whom they give birth. Restricting this right leads us onto dangerous ground, eroding sexual and reproductive health and rights enshrined in international law, including the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR).
Attempts to limit women’s legal rights around childbirth should alarm us all. History teaches that reproductive control rarely stops at one point of intervention.
The Difficult Question Too Few Are Asking: Why?
Critics have rushed to blame social media influencers and so-called “birth keepers” for these deaths. This simplistic narrative dismisses the real motivations driving women’s decisions and insults their intelligence. Women do not reject the healthcare system on a whim; they do so because, in their experiences or in the experiences of those they trust, it has already rejected them.
Each year about 300,000 women give birth in Australia. Approximately 97 percent do so in hospital; around 1.8 percent in birth centres; and 0.3 percent at home, mostly through regulated midwifery models. Freebirth accounts for a tiny fraction of births. There is no evidence of a sudden surge; what has increased is public attention.
What also continues to rise is birth trauma. One in three women in Australia report their birth as traumatic, and around 10 percent develop symptoms consistent with post-traumatic stress disorder. This is not fringe rhetoric. These figures come from large-scale Australian research and government-commissioned reports.
We also operate in a highly medicalised maternity environment. Induction rates for first-time mothers are close to 50 percent, and caesarean births approach 40 percent. This escalation in intervention has not corresponded with improved clinical outcomes, but it has contributed to increasing morbidity and psychological distress.
Associate Professor Vinay Rane recently noted that hospitals “can feel quite clinical and too bright, too busy,” and must work to become more inclusive and accessible. This understatement gestures toward a far deeper truth: women are telling us they do not always feel safe, respected, or seen in our maternity system. Dismissing that reality drives them further away.
Doulas Are Not the Problem
Doulas have become convenient scapegoats in this debate. In reality, they are trained providers of emotional, physical, and informational support. They do not perform clinical tasks or replace midwives or doctors. Decades of international and Australian evidence show that continuous non-clinical labour support reduces intervention rates, caesarean births, instrumental delivery, epidural use, and improves maternal emotional outcomes.
In a system where fewer than 10 percent of Australian women receive continuity of midwifery care, doulas fill a vital gap. Restricting them would remove one of the few evidence-based supports women can reliably access.
What Women Are Telling Us
Women are not turning away from maternity services because they are naïve or reckless. They are turning away because they are frightened of being silenced, coerced, disrespected, or traumatised.
Women tell us this in surveys, inquiries, patient complaints, advocacy forums, and public submissions. Silencing them will not make them safer. Listening to them might.
The Real Work Ahead
If we want to prevent further tragedies, we must move beyond regulation and toward reform:
• Expand access to continuity-of-midwifery-care models
• Embed trauma-informed, culturally safe care across all services
• Strengthen community-based childbirth education
• Protect and integrate doulas into collaborative maternity care pathways
• Address systemic obstetric violence, coercion, and racism
• Centre women’s experiences in policy, practice, and evaluation
The Bottom Line
Doulas are not to blame. Women are not to blame. The system has been broken for decades and women are simply doing whatever they can to ensure that they birth surrounded by people who will protect them and care for them throughout one of life’s most vulnerable moments. It is time to turn the spotlight on the real culprit: our maternity care system. Fixing it is not optional; it is overdue. Women deserve safety, dignity, and respect in childbirth, and they will keep seeking it wherever they can find it.
