16/04/2026
Minister, the assurance that the NDIS will always be there for people with "permanent and significant Disabilities" in conversation with Aspect - Autism Spectrum Australia - published today by the charity and service provider - does not align with what your policy is doing in practice.
As a Disabled People's Rep Org who are all over the issue, we know that the majority of children being redirected into Thriving Kids are Autistic children assessed at Level 2 under the DSM. That means requiring substantial support.
These are children with:
> marked communication differences
> significant functional impacts across daily life
> and a clear need for ongoing, structured support to participate in education and community life.
Autism is lifelong. These support needs are enduring and serious: in other words, permanent, and significant.
Under section 24 of the NDIS Act, a person meets the disability requirements where they have a permanent impairment that results in substantially reduced functional capacity.
Under section 25, they must also be likely to benefit from early intervention that would improve their functional capacity across their lifetime.
Level 2 Autism meets both tests.
So the issue is *not* whether these children qualify. We know they do.
The issue is that they are being diverted out of a statutory scheme and into non statutory programs, where support is discretionary, capped, and not enforceable.
That is not a neutral pathway change. It is the removal of a legal entitlement, without having been debated in Parliament or provided for in law, and against strong public opposition.
Importantly, this is being done without an evidentiary foundation, and without the consent or endorsement of Australia's Disabled People's Organisations - in breach of Article 4 (3) of the UNCRPD.
And the consequences are immediate. Reduced therapy, longer waitlists, missed early intervention are already happening. Increased pressure on families is already building, and fast. Thriving Kids will not relieve that pressure on Disabled children and the families that support them.
Changing the pathway does not change the child. It changes whether they can access support at all.
If children who meet both section 24 and section 25 are being moved out of the NDIS, then it is not accurate to say the scheme will always be there for people with permanent and significant disabilities.
Thriving Kids children *are the kids intended for the Scheme* under the core purposes outlined in the NDIS Act. They belong there. It is their right.
Why does the Federal government feel so entitled to take money from the hands of children who need it -
..and exactly where will it be spent instead?