NDIS Participants and Providers Australia

31/12/2025

31/12/2025

🚨 QUEENSLAND ALERT: PUBLIC S*X OFFENDER REGISTER IS LIVE! 🚨

Almost 4,000 convicted pedophiles, including high-risk offenders, are now publicly searchable across Queensland. Protect your children, loved ones, and vulnerable adults in care.

💡 Did you know? Some disability support workers have been charged or convicted of s*xual offences — including the Atherton and Beenleigh cases.

⚠️ It is NOT choice and control to be r***d or abused by someone you pay that's meant to care. But it IS your choice to act, seek assistance, and report it.

Thanks to Daniel’s Law, you can check if someone is a reportable offender in your area.

✅ ACT NOW – YOUR COMMUNITY NEEDS YOU:
1️⃣ Visit the Queensland Public S*x Offender Register (live Dec 31, 2025)
2️⃣ Search Tier 1–2 offenders in your local area
3️⃣ Share this info with friends, family, and NDIS participants

💬 Do you know a disability support worker who should be on this list? Speak up — help protect vulnerable people.

📞 To report s*xual assault or harm to a child under 16:

Policelink: 131 444

Local Police Station
🔗 More info: Queensland Police – Reporting S*xual Assault
https://www.police.qld.gov.au/units/victims-of-crime/support-for-victims-of-crime/adult-s*xual-assault/alternative-reporting-options #:~:text=If%20you%20are%20a%20member,child%20s*xual%20abuse%20or%20harm.

⚡ This is about awareness, protection, and ACTION. Don’t wait — your loved ones’ safety depends on it!

Official Daniel’s Law Information Page
https://www.qld.gov.au/makingqldsafer/daniels-law?

*xOffenderRegister *xoffenderawareness

31/12/2025

No NDIS funding for child without eyes while convicted Child s*x offender get $1000,000.00 in Taxpayers scheme

30/12/2025

Taxpayers left behind on NDIS

Containing cost growth and the cost-effectiveness of National Disability Insurance Scheme services are remote, thanks to a parliamentary report that recommends a ‘phased introduction’ of a less intensive program.

29/12/2025

On a sunny Friday on the outskirts of Melbourne, beachgoers were in tears for a very special reason.

29/12/2025

When heritage sites like the Sydney Opera House are updated, should universal access be non-negotiable — even if it alters the original design?
https://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-act/news/handrails-to-be-trialled-outside-sydney-opera-house/news-story/913a54f1aeef65f5030aaac97099b6f6

29/12/2025

The Australian

29/12/2025

29/12/2025

🚨 298 NDIS Banning Orders in 2025… But Could There Have Been MORE? 🚨

That’s right – 298 providers officially banned this year. Hundreds of people in our community were put at risk, yet some argue the numbers don’t go far enough.

💥 What do YOU think?
Should the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission have done more? Drop your thoughts below 👇
and let’s get this conversation started!

298 NDIS providers banned in 2025.

These bans are not issued lightly.

They are used in cases of serious harm — abuse, exploitation, fraud, and severe non-compliance.

Every number on this map represents:

• A person with disability put at risk
• A system failure that went on too long
• Action taken only after harm occurred

Qld 60 Banning Orders https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1ADVZE933N/
NSW 158 Banning Orders https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1bfJnkXFaN/
ACT 2 Banning Orders https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1Jr39P7vhz/
VIC 24 Banning Orders https://www.facebook.com/share/p/16pxwL3BT4/
TAS 3 Banning Orders https://www.facebook.com/share/p/17vMUn7ef6/
SA 32 Banning Orders https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1B1ji1yVY9/
WA 19 Banning Orders https://www.facebook.com/share/p/17tgfv7MvX/
NT 0 Banning Orders https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1M7Zq3fgqC/

28/12/2025

Growing up vision-impaired, there were many challenges I faced that sighted people just could not understand.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-12-28/mentors-gave-me-confidence-to-navigate-life-with-a-disability/106169450

28/12/2025

Family vows to continue fighting NDIS after boy, 8, has prosthetic eye funding cut

An eight-year-old boy born without eyes has suffered a new blow in his NDIS funding fight for prosthetic eyes, despite bureaucrats acknowledging he needs them.

Leo Hall, 8, who was born with no eyes and tiny eye sockets, is seeking around $13,500 a year for two pairs of expandable artificial eyes.

The prosthetics are essential for supporting his bone structure so his face grows “normally”, and they also help when it comes to socialising with other children.

The NDIS has funded his eyes since he was five years old.
But at his last plan review, his funding was denied.

In October 2024, new NDIS Support lists were introduced giving greater clarity to what the scheme will fund.

The federal government says some previously funded supports deleted from the list should fall under health and therefore be funded by the state and territories.

Leo’s mum Lauren, 34, from Brisbane, said they will fight the NDIA’s decision at an independent tribunal. They previously took their claim to the tribunal and won. However, that was before the new list was drawn up.

The other option is to fight for funding from the health authorities in Queensland.

She said it was galling that in the letter she received it appeared that the reason why the funding was rejected was down to a technical issue.

The letter states, “while the supporting evidence provided identifies a need for ocular prosthesis, it does not include details from a treating ophthalmologist regarding the specific prosthesis required, nor a prescription or assessment from a qualified professional trained to provide a prosthetic eye, the NDIS is unable to confirm the suitability of the requested ocular prosthesis.”

Ms Hall questioned why the internal review team didn’t ask her for the additional information before closing the case.

She said it was also bizarre that the letter states needing details of the prescription, because artificial eyes cannot help someone see.
“They asked for his prescription, which is totally ridiculous,” Ms Hall said.

“I definitely feel the NDIS makes this process as hard as physically possible in the hope that people just give up.

“I’m well educated and determined to see this through.

“It shouldn’t have to be a fight for the most basic essentials that is obviously needed as a direct result of his disability. I’m too deep in this to give up now.

“That would be letting the NDIS get away with misinformed and incorrect decisions that have very real impacts on people’s lives.”

Tribunals can take more than two years to conclude and can be a costly exercise, with the NDIA, under pressure to reduce the spiralling $1 billion a week scheme, regularly hiring external barristers to take on participants.

A spokesman from the NDIA said NDIS supports need to be approved in line with the NDIS Act, and ocular prosthesis is generally considered a medical device.

“Medical treatments and devices fall outside what the scheme can fund and is best delivered through the health system,’ he said.
“The agency acknowledges the difficult circumstances for Leo and his family, and we are committed to supporting Leo with the disability-related supports he requires.”