Greg's Public Awareness Blog

Greg's Public Awareness Blog This page content is strictly the opinion of Greg Bueckert.

What a surprise that would be. I wonder what his wife thought about it?  Better a car than a person.
02/08/2026

What a surprise that would be. I wonder what his wife thought about it? Better a car than a person.

Always read the fine print. 🚗💨

It's time.
02/08/2026

It's time.

Funny how priorities change with age.

This is true.  Especially at Council meetings.  Lol
02/08/2026

This is true. Especially at Council meetings. Lol

02/07/2026

Here is some interesting conjecture from Stephen Campbell:..............

STEPHEN CAMPBELL FOR MEDICINE HAT -
This is just my opinion, based on what I’ve been paying attention to over the last few years.
I’m big into this sort of stuff. I’m not against solar or new business, but…
👉 If we’re going to use solar for business, we need to know who’s using it and what it’s for.
Is it going to bring jobs?
Is it for a data mine?
And if it is for a data mine — are we getting a good deal?
Because the reality with data mines is this: if you don’t have a good deal, they can and will pull out. And that’s not hypothetical — we’ve seen it happen.
So here’s a timeline and why, in my opinion, this looks like a very specific customer.

North Bay, Ontario (2022)
Hut 8 shut down its North Bay operations.
This wasn’t about Bitcoin prices. It wasn’t about demand.
It was about power uncertainty.
Public reporting and company statements showed:
• Power delivery was suspended
• There was a power purchase agreement (PPA) dispute
• The issue went to mediation/litigation
• Operations stopped
• Equipment was moved out, not scrapped
That’s important: the assets still had value — they just needed a better power market.

Drumheller, Alberta (2022–2023)
Hut 8 shut down its Drumheller site as well.
The reasons cited were:
• High electricity costs
• Voltage and power quality issues
Again, not ideology. Not politics.
Just power economics and reliability.
And again — equipment was relocated, not abandoned.

Medicine Hat becomes the consolidation point
While North Bay and Drumheller were shutting down:
• Equipment from both locations was moved to Medicine Hat
• Medicine Hat became the stable base because of:
• Municipal power
• Scale
• Long-term contract certainty
This is a pattern, not a coincidence.

The Saamis Solar project — what people miss
Another key point that gets glossed over:
• The Saamis Solar project existed on paper for years
• The City of Medicine Hat only actively began pursuing it around 2023
• Regulatory approval came in 2024, which finally allowed the City to move forward
• Council has approved proceeding only if a committed customer signs a power contract first
That condition matters a lot.
This isn’t speculative solar.
This is customer-driven infrastructure.

The expansion timing
Around the same time the regulatory approvals fell into place:
• Hut 8 publicly discussed a major expansion in Medicine Hat
• Figures floated publicly amount to roughly 14× growth (about 1,400%)
• The equipment is already here
At this point, expansion doesn’t hinge on hardware.
It hinges on power certainty and pricing.

Why solar matters to data mines and AI
This part isn’t about ideology — it’s about risk management.
Large compute operations want solar because it gives them:
• Long-term price certainty
• Protection from future regulatory or carbon costs
• Easier approval for large power loads
• Political and community cover
• Grid stability when paired with baseload power
Solar doesn’t replace baseload — it stabilizes it.

What I took from last night’s council meeting
And here’s where this turns into opinion, clearly labeled:
At last night’s council meeting, right before the vote, it sounded very much like there was already someone ready to sign.
That wasn’t stated outright — but it was strongly implied.

My opinion, based on the full picture
When I put it all together:
• North Bay shuts down because of power uncertainty
• Drumheller shuts down because of power cost and quality
• Equipment from both moves to Medicine Hat
• Medicine Hat becomes the growth centre
• The City advances solar only with a committed customer
• A massive expansion is publicly discussed
• The equipment is already here
• And there are hints that a deal is ready
In my opinion, we’ve figured out who the customer is.
That’s not a statement of fact.
That’s a conclusion based on timing, behavior, and incentives.

The bottom line
Stability is what these operations are looking for.
And as long as we get a good deal, this could be good:
• We could make money
• We could lock in long-term revenue
• We could leverage our power advantage
But the key word is deal.
If we’re going to use solar for business:
• We need transparency
• We need stability
• And we need to make sure the City — and residents — actually benefit
Big energy users don’t gamble.
They go where the power works — and where the deal makes sense.
Stephen

Canada needs help. Alberta needs help. This cannot hurt anyone except the indignant Liberals that may have a stroke
02/06/2026

Canada needs help. Alberta needs help. This cannot hurt anyone except the indignant Liberals that may have a stroke

For those of you who are outraged because Jamil Jivani, the Yale educated lawyer/ Canadian MP/ friend to the US Vice President has gone to D.C. in an attempt to improve our situation, I have this to say. While you’re banging on that he’s “not qualified” to do so, let me remind you that your former Prime Minister was a part time drama teacher & Snow Board instructor. You voted him into the PMO three times! I might also add that this has a great deal to do with the situation we find ourselves in today. Nevertheless, suddenly, QUALIFACTIONS MATTER! Wait…what about all your virtue signaling in support of DEI? What about all the virtue signalling for “Team Canada?” Has your TDS progressed to the point where you’d rather see our country go off a cliff before you’d accept a helping hand? After all, economists are now reporting that Canada’s economy is on life support & in recession watch. What harm could Mr. Jivani’s visit to Washington possibly cause? I’ll go out on a limb & say likely none. If it turns out that i’m wrong, so be it. I’ll admit it. Besides, if Mr. Jivani returns with nothing more than a White House drink coaster in his luggage, it will be better than anything we’ve seen thus far. Thank you for not giving any attention to this matter. 😝
-- Copy & pasted
■ ◇ ■ ◇ ■

02/06/2026

Here is an interesting idea from a reader - reforming the Council so that the Mayor is chosen from one of the elected Councilor's. The group of Councilors would select the mayor from amongst themselves. It is am interesting concept. I will post the background information for public discussion. It would be a switch to a ward system like other cities. This system is currently in use in Cypress County so it is not entirely foreign to our area.

What do you think?

Executive Summary: Governance Changes for Medicine Hat
Executive Summary: Governance Changes for Medicine Hat
Overview
Medicine Hat City Council can implement two governance changes under Alberta’s
Municipal Government Act (MGA):
1. Transition from an at-large electoral system (no wards) to a ward-based system.
- Requires a bylaw under MGA s.143.
- Deadline: December 31 of the year prior to the general election.
2. Change mayor selection from voter-elected to council-appointed (with or without
wards).
- Requires a bylaw under MGA s.150.
- Deadline: December 31 of the year prior to the general election.
- Key Clarification: This change cannot occur mid-cycle. If passed after the
deadline, it applies only to the next election (e.g., passed in 2025 → effective for
2029 election).
Key Steps
- Council resolution to pursue governance changes.
- Public engagement (mandatory for ward boundaries).
- Draft and pass bylaws by December 31 prior to election year.
- Appoint returning officer at least 6 months before election (LAEA s.13).
- Update election procedures and communicate changes to residents.
Implications
- Ward System: Introduces geographic representation.
- Council-Elected Mayor: Shifts accountability from electorate to council.
- Public Perception: Requires clear communication to maintain trust.
Next Election Year
Medicine Hat’s next municipal election: 2025
Deadline for governance changes: December 31, 2024
Current timing: Changes made now (November 2025) apply to 2029 election.
References
- MGA ss.143, 150–151
- LAEA s.13
- Alberta Municipal Affairs Candidate Guide

Briefing Note
Briefing Note
Issue
To outline the legislative and procedural requirements for the City of Medicine Hat to:

1. Transition from an at-large electoral system (no wards) to a ward-based system.
OR
2. Retain an at-large system (no wards) but change the selection of the Chief Elected
Official (CEO, commonly called Mayor) from direct election by voters to appointment by
council.

3. Clarify whether a change in mayor selection can occur mid-cycle.
Background
Medicine Hat currently elects all councillors and the mayor at large during municipal
elections. Under Alberta’s Municipal Government Act (MGA), RSA 2000, c M-26,
municipalities have flexibility to determine:
- Whether councillors are elected at large or by ward.
- Whether the mayor is elected by voters or appointed by council.
Elections are regulated by the Local Authorities Election Act (LAEA).
Analysis
Option 1: Transition to a Ward System
- Authority: Section 143 MGA allows council to decide whether councillors are elected at
large or by ward.
- Process: Pass a bylaw establishing wards and defining boundaries. Deadline:
December 31 of the year preceding the general election (MGA s.151).
- Considerations: Public consultation recommended; wards should reflect population
equity and community representation.
Citation: MGA ss.143, 151.
Option 2: Council-Elected Mayor with No Wards
- Authority: Section 150 MGA permits municipalities to determine how the CEO is
selected—either by voters at large or by council from among elected councillors.
- Process: Pass a bylaw specifying that the CEO will be appointed by council. Deadline:
December 31 of the year before the election (MGA s.151).
- Key Point: No requirement to adopt a ward system in order for council to elect the
mayor.
Citation: MGA ss.150–151.

Clarification: Mid-Cycle Changes
- A municipality cannot change the method of selecting the mayor mid-term.
- Section 151 MGA requires that any bylaw changing the selection method must be
passed by December 31 of the year prior to the general election.
- Implication: If Medicine Hat passes the bylaw now (November 2025), it will only apply
to the 2029 election, not the current term.
Citation: MGA s.151.
Election Administration
- Governed by the Local Authorities Election Act (LAEA).
- Returning officer must be appointed at least six months before election day (LAEA
s.13).
- All governance changes must be finalized before nomination day.
Citation: LAEA s.13.
Implications for Medicine Hat
- Governance: Ward system introduces geographic representation; council-elected
mayor shifts accountability from electorate to council.
- Public Perception: May raise concerns about reduced direct voter influence.
- Operational: Requires administrative updates and public education.
Options
1. Status Quo: Maintain at-large system and voter-elected mayor.
2. Ward System Only: Introduce wards but retain voter-elected mayor.
3. Council-Elected Mayor Only: Retain at-large system but appoint mayor internally.
4. Both Changes: Adopt wards and appoint mayor internally.
Recommendation
That Medicine Hat City Council:
- Decide which governance model best meets community needs.
- Direct administration to draft bylaws for the chosen changes.
- Conduct public engagement on ward boundaries and governance implications.
- Pass bylaws by December 31 prior to the next election year to ensure compliance.
References
- Municipal Government Act, RSA 2000, c M-26, ss.143, 150–151
- Local Authorities Election Act, s.13
- Alberta Municipal Affairs Candidate Guide

And no participation badges either.
02/06/2026

And no participation badges either.

Lessons from a much tougher generation.

Good point!
02/06/2026

Good point!

Asking for clarity.

They are near me too.
02/05/2026

They are near me too.

"We tried negotiating. They refused." 💀

Sounds about right. Canada geese don't negotiate.

They don't compromise. They just choose violence and claim territory. Honestly, the park rangers had no choice but to surrender.

You don't argue with a creature that has zero fear and unlimited aggression.

Welcome to Canada, where even the wildlife has an attitude problem. 🦢🚫

02/05/2026

They turn on???

02/05/2026

Address

Medicine Hat, AB

Opening Hours

Monday 8am - 6pm
Tuesday 8am - 6pm
Wednesday 8am - 6pm
Thursday 8am - 6pm
Friday 8am - 6pm
Saturday 9am - 3pm
Sunday 12pm - 3pm

Telephone

+14035290577

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Greg's Public Awareness Blog posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Greg's Public Awareness Blog:

Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest Share on Reddit Share via Email
Share on WhatsApp Share on Instagram Share on Telegram