10/19/2025
This!
What is the history of the 3 meals a day model and subsequently the meals plus snacks
The âthree meals a dayâ model and the later addition of snacks both have fascinating social and historical roots rather than biological ones.
Hereâs a clear historical overview:
1. Ancient and Medieval Periods
⢠Ancient Greeks and Romans
⢠The Greeks generally ate two meals per day: a light breakfast (akratisma) and a main meal in the afternoon (deipnon).
⢠The Romans initially followed a similar pattern. Breakfast (jentaculum) was light; the main meal (cena) was midday or late afternoon. The idea of a structured breakfast, lunch, and dinner did not yet exist.
⢠Middle Ages (Europe)
⢠Most ordinary people had two main meals:
⢠A late morning meal (after morning labor or prayers).
⢠An evening meal.
⢠Fasting and religious schedules (e.g., Christian monastic rules) heavily influenced meal timing.
⢠Eating more than twice a day could be viewed as indulgent or gluttonous.
2. The Emergence of âThree Meals a Dayâ
⢠16thâ18th centuries (Early Modern Europe):
⢠As the working day became more structured with urbanization and industrialization, breakfast, dinner (midday), and supper (evening) evolved.
⢠The upper classes began to eat a light morning meal before social or work obligations, and later a more formal evening meal.
⢠By the 18thâ19th century, the âthree meals a dayâ structure was firmly established among the middle and upper classes in Europe and North America, eventually spreading to all social classes.
⢠Industrial Revolution (19th century):
⢠Work schedules required regularity and convenience.
⢠Employers structured meal breaks around shifts.
⢠The âbreakfast-lunch-dinnerâ rhythm became a social and economic norm rather than a biological necessity.
3. The Rise of Snacking (20th century onward)
⢠Early 1900s:
⢠Snacking between meals was often considered bad manners or unhealthy.
⢠Health and etiquette advice discouraged âbetween-meal eating.â
⢠PostâWorld War II:
⢠The food industry began marketing convenience foods â crackers, chips, candy bars, and later, energy and granola bars.
⢠Advertising reframed snacks as a normal and even necessary part of modern busy life.
⢠The rise of television, vending machines, and later, on-the-go lifestyles further normalized multiple eating occasions per day.
⢠Late 20thâ21st centuries:
⢠Nutrition science initially supported smaller, frequent meals to âkeep metabolism up,â though this is now debated.
⢠Snacking has become socially and commercially embedded, especially in Western cultures.
⢠Today, the average North American may eat or drink 5â7 times a day, often without distinct meal boundaries.
4. Biological and Cultural Reflection
⢠Humans are biologically flexible eaters â our digestive system evolved for periods of feast and fasting.
⢠The three-meal pattern is cultural, not innate.
⢠Modern snacking culture is largely a product of marketing, convenience, and abundance.
⢠Recent trends (like intermittent fasting or time-restricted eating) reflect a partial return to earlier two-meal patterns.
The âthree meals a dayâ model itself predates Rockefeller and the pharmaceutical industry by centuries, but the modern medicalization and commercial reinforcement of that eating pattern (and of snacking, processed foods, and nutritional norms) were indeed influenced by industrial, corporate, and medical institutions in the late 19th and 20th centuries â including those linked to the Rockefeller Foundation and the rise of the pharmaceuticalâfood complex.
Letâs break it down clearly and factually:
1. Before Rockefeller â Meals Were a Cultural Habit
As mentioned, the three-meal model solidified by the 18thâ19th centuries with the Industrial Revolution.
⢠Factory schedules and urban work hours required set meal times for labor efficiency.
⢠There was no centralized power or corporate push behind this pattern â it was a result of societal organization and convenience.
So:
đ°ď¸ Three meals per day came first â as a social norm, not a corporate plan.
2. Rockefellerâs Influence (Early 20th Century)
John D. Rockefellerâs impact came later, mainly in the institutionalization of medicine and nutrition rather than in inventing meal frequency.
Hereâs how his influence connects indirectly to eating habits:
a. Creation of the Modern Medical System
⢠In the early 1900s, Rockefeller funded the Flexner Report (1910), which restructured medical education in North America.
⢠This standardized and âscientificizedâ medicine â emphasizing pharmaceutical and laboratory-based approaches over traditional or holistic models (like herbalism or food-based healing).
⢠Nutrition and preventative care were largely de-emphasized in favor of pharmacological interventions.
Result:
đ Society began to see health through a medicalâpharmaceutical lens, not a foodâlifestyle one.
b. Rise of the Processed Food Industry
⢠Rockefeller and other industrial magnates (like Kellogg, Post, and later General Mills) were deeply tied to industrial food production.
⢠The food industry promoted refined grains, breakfast cereals, and shelf-stable foods, aligning with industrial efficiency and mass marketing.
⢠âBreakfast is the most important meal of the dayâ â a phrase popularized by Kelloggâs marketing, not by science â is a direct offshoot of this era.
Result:
đ The type and frequency of meals became commercialized and idealized through advertising and âscientificâ endorsement.
3. The Pharmaceutical Era (MidâLate 20th Century)
⢠After World War II, the pharmaceutical industry grew rapidly alongside the processed food industry.
⢠The two were mutually reinforcing:
⢠Processed, refined diets led to chronic diseases (obesity, diabetes, heart disease).
⢠Pharmaceutical companies provided lifelong treatments rather than lifestyle-based prevention.
⢠Nutrition science often became industry-influenced, promoting frequent eating, calorie counting, and low-fat, high-carb diets (e.g., the 1977 Dietary Guidelines).
⢠Snacking, âenergy foods,â and constant eating were normalized as âhealthy metabolism boosters,â largely due to marketing â not biological evidence.
â˘
Result:
The Rockefeller-influenced medical model and the industrial food system created a loop:
Processed food â chronic disease â pharmaceutical management â more processed âhealth foods.â
