27/11/2025
When we chose the topic for the latest British Psychological Society Hub event in Aberdeen to be assisted dying, we knew it was a big one. We had no doubt it would spark a discussion that will involve facts and emotions.
And it happened.
We often debate Assisted Dying as a legal concept, but what does it mean for the people? This is a conversation where profound personal suffering meets complex legal, moral and psychological realities.
I’m grateful Dr Sarah Sivers, LLB (Hons), PhD, Associate Dean for Research, School of Law and Social Sciences, Robert Gordon University and Dr Katrina Forbes-McKay MA (Hons), PhD, SFHEA, CPsychol, Senior Lecturer in Psychology, RGU.
Their dual perspectives made it clear that while law provides the essential structure, it is psychology, ethics, and compassion that give the process its meaning and humanity
A few takeaways that have stayed with me:
As Katrina highlighted, data shows this isn’t always about physical pain. The top reasons include serious psychological distress:
- Loss of Autonomy
- Inability to Enjoy Life
- Loss of Dignity
- feeling of being a burden
Interestingly, research shows that those working closer with people at the end of their lives (palliative care, geriatric medicine) oppose the Assisted dying bill more.
What’s more interesting, in countries this bill has become a law, this statistics flips and the opposite becomes the reality
Both speakers mentioned the ‘Slippery slope’, the ethical concern that a law for the terminally ill could erode to include other vulnerable groups.
Sarah offered a powerful reframe: The ‘slippery slope’ argument is met with the fact that ‘the law is a snow gate.’ So, robust, carefully written legislation with strict safeguards is designed not to enable a slide, but to prevent it.
This conversation is about compassion, choice and control. We should keep it going.
What are your thoughts?