20/10/2025
Anyone who has been around me for more than five minutes knows that I love bicycles and cycling. When I am not extolling the benefits of strength training I am talking about the delights of riding a bike. I am so keen on cycling that I have ended up running a local cycling club, Ride63 www.ridesixtythree.net for those who are interested. (Note to self: do not join any more committees if you don’t want to end up running them in a few years’ time!)
So it might surprise you that I don’t generally recommend cycling as a form of exercise for health. (Though I might specifically recommend it to some clients who might not be able to walk or run.)
Cycling can offer enormous health and fitness benefits but if you are looking for the best return on your investment then walking and running provide much more than cycling generally will (in terms of time and effort resulting in health and fitness improvements). The graphic below (please see the link at the end of the article) illustrates that: take a look at the efficiency of a human being on foot vs. on a bicycle and understand that the more efficient a movement is, the less effective it becomes in terms of fitness. The very efficiency of cycling that makes it such a great form of transport can be its downfall when it comes to improving (or even maintaining) fitness.
When I am looking at forms of movement for fitness and health benefits I consider the safety, efficiency and effectiveness on various systems in the human body (I am not going to discuss safety here). For my clients I want activities that get their bodies moving (i.e. joints rotating, flexing and extending, muscles contracting, lymphatic and venous fluids being returned to the trunk), impact loads acting on the skeleton, increased and sustained demands on the cardiovascular system (e.g. heart and breathing rates increased and increased capillarisation) and metabolic effects (increased mitochondria, improved processing of lactate, etc.). Time spent on your feet walking and running deliver all of these, limited only by how fast and far you go and if you incorporate steep hills or not. Dancing (done vigorously enough) can be excellent in these regards as well. Cycling (and swimming) can deliver most of these but don’t deliver impact forces to the skeleton. (For some people, that might just be what the doctor ordered but most of us benefit from experiencing these forces.)
I don’t ride a bike for fitness, though I do reap considerable fitness benefits from doing so. It is something I do purely for the fun and joy that it brings and that is incredibly good for my mental health, even if I wasn’t getting any physical benefits as well. For me, riding a bike is more about recreation and escape from my everyday than it is about getting or staying fit. Strength training, walking and running are what I do to keep fit (though here again, walking is more about movement and enjoyment rather than cardiovascular fitness). Essentially, I keep fit in order to be able to ride my bike because the fitter I am the longer and farther I can ride and the more enjoyment I get from riding.
Cyclists can be amongst the fittest of athletes but only if they are willing to push themselves hard and not allow the efficiency of the machine to give them an easy ride. I do push myself hard therefore I get a lot of cardiovascular exercise but it is relatively easy to cruise along on a bicycle, especially if one avoids anything that looks like a hill, and exert much less effort than you would if you were to walk, never mind run, over the same route. This is doubly so if you use an e-bike. I took one for a spin a few weeks ago and rode up one of my local climbs. On my ‘analogue’ bike it usually takes me about 18 minutes of maximum sustainable effort (with a heart rate of 160-170bpm) while on the e-bike (I was deliberately not pushing the pace but I did not use the maximum electrical assist either) my heart rate barely topped 110bpm, which is less effort than I might show during a brisk walk along a flat path and considerably less effort than I typically exert riding down hills (at high speed) on my usual bikes. During a short run a couple of days ago I sustained an average heart rate of 150bpm over 15 minutes while during nearly two hours of riding the e-bike I barely went over 110bpm even for a few seconds. You can clearly see that the cardiovascular benefit of a short run is considerably more than riding an e-bike up a fairly tough hill.
So if you are going to cycle for the fitness benefits please make sure you put some considerable effort in. Buy a device to track and measure your heart rate so that you know just how much effort you are putting into the activity. Get familiar with your maximum heart rate (Zone 5), your maximal sustainable heart rate (Zone 3 to 4 – your lactate threshold, for those in the know) and your Zone 2 heart rates (for me that is 183bpm, 165-170bpm and 110-144bpm). Aim to spend most of your time in Zone 2 but at least some time pushing into Zone 4 (Zone 5 is something you can only manage for a few seconds – maybe minutes – at a time because it is so hard work).
If you want to take this further, monitor your efforts while walking and you will see that the cardiovascular benefits of walking do exist but are considerably less than you’d get from running and hard cycling. (Unless I am climbing a particularly steep hill I can rarely raise my heart rate into Zone 2 while walking, but that is an indication of my generally high level of fitness.) That said, I am less bothered about getting your heart rate up than I am about getting you stronger and moving regularly. Strength training and walking are just about all you need to do and everybody – top level cyclists included – should do both for the benefit of their health. Running adds considerable benefits but can be thought of as the cherry on the cake.
There is, of course, a lot more context and nuance to add to my recommendations here. So much so that I probably need to write that book I keep thinking about! So in the meantime, Get Strong, Stay Strong and Happy Cycling!
For Scientific American’s 180th birthday, they have updated a classic graphic comparing different forms of animal locomotion, first published in 1973. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/a-human-on-a-bicycle-is-among-the-most-efficient-forms-of-travel-in-the/