10/03/2026
Spotted people talking about this Chinese paper that claims that people with heart disease in particular are suffering from suppressed immune function post COVID.
The authors had samples taken from people in Shandong from “pre-COVID” (January 2021-December 2022), “mass infection” (December 2022-February 2023–apparently they had a “zero COVID policy. The paper doesn’t discuss whether they considered trying to check whether people might have been infected before then, not that that would be easy to do using anti-spike antibody testing or some other testing. But let’s roll with their claims), and “post-COVID” (March 2023-December 2024).
Pay attention to that timeline.
The “wave” happened much later than in the west. And it was over before March 2023.
From March 2023, the authors concluded that everyone had already had and recovered from COVID.
Now, look at the graphs showing a sudden and profound crash in lymphocytes…
In August 2023!
That’s more than 5 months after the end of the outbreak.
Hmmmm…
Could anything have happened just before August 2023, I hear you ask.
Great question. I was curious as well.
So naturally, I asked my bestie, Sonnet 4.5.
And apparently, in April 2023, a new “Vaccination work plan for response to recent COVID-19 infection” was issued.
Then in July 2023, the Chinese government updated COVID-19 vaccination guidance to increase immunity levels in specific groups and reduce the risk of severe disease.
Between May 23rd, 2023, and August 28th, 2023, 4089 eligible people were equally randomised to receive a booster dose of aerosolised Ad5-nCoV.
But I’m sure that’s all completely irrelevant.
It makes far more sense that a “pandemic” came and went without impacting the immune systems but that the crash in immune function occurred in temporal relationship with a new vaccine push, and the drop in lymphocytes occurred secondary to the infections that they didn’t document that anyone in the study actually suffered from.
Incidentally, in case you’re wondering, no they did NOT analyse lymphocyte counts according to vaccination status. Because why would you do that when your own data very clearly show a definitive drop in lymphocyte counts that tie with a vaccine programme?