05/04/2026
The UK government’s interim Mental Health, ADHD and Autism Prevalence Review has landed.
I was interviewed as part of the ‘lived experience’ input to the review process (as were others I know in our lovely ADHD family), and provided both published and unpublished data from our ADHDadultUK national surveys (including responses from over 2,500 people).
The report admits things are complicated.
Key findings:
– ADHD diagnoses and referrals have increased dramatically, but…
– Population prevalence appears relatively stable (so it’s not “everyone is suddenly getting ADHD”, which, well, WE all knew)
– Waiting lists are now in the hundreds of thousands
– More women and adults are being diagnosed
But nuance matters.
The “stable prevalence” claim is based on:
– limited adult data
– and child datasets that largely pre-date the recent surge
At the same time:
– self-reported ADHD symptoms are increasing
– psychological distress (especially in young people) is rising
– and diagnosis is often the gateway to support
So we end up with a messy reality:
More people are struggling
More people are seeking help
More people are being diagnosed
…but we still don’t know:
Whether severity has changed
Whether diagnostic thresholds have shifted
Or how much systems themselves are driving demand
And crucially:
We still lack good data on
functional impairment, day-to-day impact, and outcomes.
Which makes designing policy… tricky.
Possibly the most important shift?
Moving away from diagnosis as the gatekeeper for support, and towards support based on need.
Which is promising, but only if done well.
Because poorly implemented, that risks:
– inconsistency
– missed cases (especially high-masking individuals)
– and a shiny new version of the same old postcode lottery
So no, ADHD hasn’t suddenly appeared out of nowhere.
But the way we recognise it, measure it, and respond to it… is changing fast.
And right now, the system isn’t keeping up.
📄 DHSC (2026) Interim Review into Mental Health Conditions, ADHD and Autism