13/02/2026
“I read your post about fidget aids but in no way would it work with my pupils.”
*
I had this exact conversation with pupils today during a maths lesson.
I noticed that one pupil reaches for the same fidget aid every time they come into my classroom. They use it well. It works for them. They concentrate.
So I asked them whether they use fidget aids in other lessons.
They said they didn’t.
I told them that watching them shows me that having something in their hands helps them focus and concentrate. It clearly works for them. So perhaps it would help elsewhere too.
“But some people make noise with their fidget aids,” one of them said.
And that’s true.
And that’s annoying for pupils.
And it can be annoying for teachers.
So what do we do?
Well, we do what any group of people who all need to get on with each other do.
We talk about it.
I had a pupil with a clicky pen. They liked to click away (very much like Number 3 in my previous post). And I couldn’t concentrate with the clicking happening.
So I paused the lesson and said, can we talk about living together as a class?
I explained that we absolutely should support our sensory needs when they help us regulate or concentrate. That matters. But we also have to meet those needs in a way that works for the people we share the space with.
No one need outweighs another need.
We identify what the needs are.
Then we investigate how we can meet them in a way that works for everyone in the room -including the teacher.
My clicky pen pupil now uses a different fidget aid. One that gives pressure under their thumb. It’s silent. It still gives them the sensory input they need.
It works for the class.
It works for me.
And most importantly, it works for them.
That’s the point.
It isn’t about banning fidgets.
It isn’t about ignoring sensory needs.
It’s about problem solving together.
That’s what inclusion actually looks like.
Emma
The Autistic SENCo
♾️
Photo: Number 3 learning to ski