08/06/2022
Anytime I post about vitamin K being offered to newborn babies, it’s almost guaranteed that it will generate some responses on the extreme ends of the opinion spectrum.
I don’t know why that happens more with vitamin K than some other topics, but it does.
There are people who believe that any parent who questions or declines vitamin K for their newborn baby is irresponsible, under-informed or worse.
I don’t agree with them.
I support healthy questioning of any drug, treatment or intervention. It’s important to be able to weigh up pros and cons and decide if something is right for us or our babies. Many of my books are based on helping parents understand the evidence so they can do that.
Then there are people who believe that vitamin K (or the other substances that some preparations of vitamin K may contain) is a terribly dangerous substance and should never be given to a baby.
I don’t agree with them either.
All medications and interventions have risks and downsides as well as benefits. But in some situations, for some people, the benefits outweigh the possible downsides.
That’s up to them to decide.
And, as I wrote in my book ‘Vitamin K and the Newborn,’ there often aren’t clear-cut, black-and-white, all-or-nothing answers.
Often, it’s more complicated than that. The answer lies in between the extremes. It’s nuanced, and sometimes it depends.
I realise there’s an irony in my posting this on social media, but sometimes we need to get away from the extreme-focused viewpoints that often exist on social media, so we can understand issues that deserve more than a shouty sentence or two.
If you’d like to find out more about vitamin K, I have an information hub of free resources and a book on this topic. You can find links to both at www.sarawickham.com/vk
Yes, you can share/repost as long as you keep the original pic, text and credit intact. Please do not put Sara’s work/words into your own branding.