27/12/2025
Within the person-centred approach, articulated by Carl Rogers, three core conditions support growth and healing: Congruence, Unconditional Positive Regard, and Empathic Understanding.
Congruence is often described simply as being real, but in practice it is much deeper than honesty alone. Congruence is inner alignment — when what we feel, think, say, and do are broadly in harmony. When congruence is present, people often feel safer, even when the truth being spoken is difficult. When it is absent, something can feel off, even if the words sound pleasant.
From my lived and professional experience, I understand incongruence as existing at both ends of a behavioural spectrum, with congruence sitting at the centre — a fulcrum.
At one extreme are narcissistic-leaning behaviours, where painful emotions are directed outward. There may be charm or smiling externally, while internally there is anger, spite, jealousy, greed, blame, or contempt. The energy moves away from self and onto others.
At the opposite extreme are people-pleasing behaviours, which are also forms of masking. Here, a “yes” hides a “no”. Smiles conceal resentment, fear, obligation, guilt, shame, self-blame, or unworthiness. The energy turns inward, directed against the self.
Different direction — same split.
Those shaped by trauma or chronic unpredictability are often particularly attuned to incongruence. Research into neuroception and affective neuroscience suggests that humans continuously and unconsciously scan for safety, threat, and authenticity — often sensing misalignment before it is consciously recognised. This is frequently mislabeled as “hypersensitivity”, when it may in fact be refined survival intelligence.
At the centre of this spectrum sits congruence, alongside truth, honesty, integrity, empathy, compassion, respect, trust, love — and crucially, accountability.
This is how I understand the healing journey - recognising - learning how emotions feel in the body, noticing when we are out of alignment, understanding the consequences of directing pain outward or inward, and gently returning to centre. Reasoning with ourselves. Repairing where needed. Listening to conscience rather than overriding it.
This also has relevance in leadership. Imposter leaders often move between the two ends of the scale — deflecting responsibility outward through blame or control when challenged, and shifting inward through appeasement, avoidance, or false humility when approval is at risk. What is missing is not competence, but congruence. Decisions are driven by self-protection rather than accountability or care for those in their responsibility.
Congruence is not about being harsh or unfiltered.
It is about being real without harm.
And when we move closer to centre, nervous systems settle, relationships soften, and trust has room to grow.
This is my perspective — shaped by lived experience and practice — offered not as diagnosis, but as an invitation to reflect.