28/11/2025
THE FEI BLOOD RULE (ARTICLE 259) CHANGE FOR JUMPING - WHAT AM I MISSING?
🐎When the FEI's new blood rule for jumping was passed, I found myself confused. Why take a backward step on horse welfare? Why only in jumping? Why not across all disciplines? I've remained quiet, trying to understand if there was some nuance I've missed or misinterpreted. I don't think there is.
🐎WHO HAS SAID WHAT?🐎
I was really impressed that the BEF did not vote for this rule and that both the BEF and BS have denounced the change.
-BEF
Jim Eyre, Chief Executive of British Equestrian, said: “We support the FEI’s commitment to equine welfare, but based on the evidence and expert opinion, we could not support this rule. The vote was far from unanimous, and we welcome the FEI’s pledge to ongoing review and dialogue.
“If horses are to have a future in sport, we must demonstrate unwavering respect for their welfare. That means clear, ethical rules that put the horse first. We remain committed to working with the FEI and fellow federations to ensure fairness, clarity, and the highest standards of care in equestrian sport.”
-BS
British Showjumping Chief Executive Iain Graham said, “As leaders in equestrian sport, our duty is clear: protect our athletes, human and equine, and put horse welfare at the heart of every decision.
“While we recognise the riders’ concerns and welcome elements like enhanced veterinary checks and tougher penalties for repeat offences, removing automatic elimination for visible blood is a step backwards. It risks eroding public trust and undermines the very progress these changes aim to achieve.
The FEI's WELFARE ADVISOR
In March 2025 Dr Andrew McLean was invited to collaborate with the FEI on their Equine Welfare Strategy. This month following the rule change he said [re rule 259] "A very backward step. The FEI Welfare Group's strong recommendation against adopting this proposal was completely ignored. For me, never a more bizarre and stupid example of nailing one's own coffin.”
🐎WHO DO WE THINK VOTED AGAINST THE RULE CHANGE🐎
Votes are generally not made public, but Sweden, Germany, Austria, Denmark and Taipei are all believed to have voted AGAINST the change and GB have publicly stated they did not vote for the change!
ARTICLE 259
The new rule (Article 259 of the FEI Jumping Regulations) stipulates that rider induced blood on the horse will no longer lead to automatic elimination. Instead, a system of jumping recorded warnings will be introduced:
-First and second violations: registered warning
-Two or more recorded warnings within twelve months: a fine of CHF 1,000 and a one-month suspension.
If the blood stems from other causes, for example, the horse has bitten its tongue or is bleeding from the nose, the combination may be allowed to continue in the competition, provided that the horse is deemed fit by a veterinarian check.
The previous rule (240.3.30) covering automatic elimination in the event of the presence of blood has been removed. Rule (264.2.1) on automatic elimination for marks that indicate excessive use of spurs remains in place.
🐎MY CONCERNS🐎
Where as before it was clear: BLOOD = ELIMINATION, it will now be an OPINION-based rule not an absolute. I am concerned we may find vets under extreme pressure to allow horses to continue. If you have been around high-level competition you will understand the pressure that some riders and teams can bring to bear.
BLEEDING FROM THE NOSE - Potentially an indication of EIPH (Epistaxis) i.e. blood from the lung. Potentially linked to atrial fibrillation (AF). AF may progress to more severe arrhythmias and is associated with risks like collapse or sudden death. Will anyone be endoscoping horses to ensure that any blood in the nose is not from the lungs?
🐎DISSAPOINTED does not really begin to cover it. I thought we were moving in the right direction, but now I'm not so sure.
🐎WHAT ARE YOUR VIEWS?🐎
Is the new blood rule for jumping acceptable? Is it a step forward?