28/01/2026
When menopause advice uses words like natural, non-synthetic or hormone-balancing, people often hear:
- safer
- gentler
- risk-free
- better for women
- more “in tune” with the body
That belief is understandable, especially when women feel dismissed or unsupported when they try to access healthcare.
But every time I open Instagram, there’s another sponsored post advertising supplements targeted at menopausal women.
You then see other women sharing that they’re taking multiple supplements and feeling better.
And that matters.
But “feeling better” doesn’t tell us why it helped, who it’s safe for, or what else may have been changing at the same time, including contraindications with other medications.
Risk doesn’t disappear just because something is labelled natural.
Menopause symptoms fluctuate.
Expectation and placebo play a role too.
And this is where the language becomes risky.
Because none of that is guaranteed by the word natural.
You know what else is natural?
Arsenic.
Cyanide.
Hemlock.
And they are definitely not on my menopause support list.
Women are increasingly refusing evidence-based care in favour of unregulated supplements because they’re labelled “natural”, yet nobody is in the garden herbal foraging.
These supplements are extracted, processed, concentrated and packaged, not plucked from a plant and ready to go!
Ashwagandha for example, has recognised contraindications, including thyroid conditions and antidepressant use.
“Natural” isn’t a safety label.
It’s a marketing one.
And just to be clear, this isn’t me telling anyone to take pharmaceuticals.
That’s outside my scope of practice.
But It is about recognising that one option is regulated, dose standardised and monitored and the other isn’t.
Women should have informed consent, understanding what you’re taking, why you’re taking it, and what evidence (or lack of it) sits behind it.
Women also deserve clarity, not confusion dressed up as empowerment.