Vasco Knight

Vasco Knight Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from Vasco Knight, Medical and health, London.

Born from the Global Vascular Network (GVN) under CVC(China Vascular Congress), Vasco Knight spearheads international academic exchange by engaging with major symposiums worldwide.

28/02/2026
What impressed me most about FYA is how cases are discussed through a complete clinical decision-making pathway.From ass...
28/02/2026

What impressed me most about FYA is how cases are discussed through a complete clinical decision-making pathway.
From assessment to strategy and ex*****on, every step is openly debated.

Whether aortic or peripheral, the discussions are intense and highly interactive.

27/02/2026

Cool

Vasco Knight in Europe 🇪🇺 |  | In Europe, the vascular conversation has a very clear rhythm —open, structured, and truly...
27/02/2026

Vasco Knight in Europe 🇪🇺
| |

In Europe, the vascular conversation has a very clear rhythm —
open, structured, and truly focused on clinical reality.

At FYA, we see one of the most thoughtfully designed vascular meetings today:
interactive formats, parallel aortic & peripheral thinking, and a real respect for fundamentals.
Not noise, but logic. Not trends, but algorithms.

Alongside platforms like SITE and LINC,
FYA represents the depth and openness of the European vascular community.

Vasco Knight is here —
to listen, to connect, and to bring China’s endovascular journey into this shared conversation.

This is not a visit.
It’s a long-term journey.

From Europe, towards a more connected global vascular ecosystem.

Vasco Knight @ FYA 2026A new journey, with the right people.FYA has always been one of the most unique vascular meetings...
27/02/2026

Vasco Knight @ FYA 2026
A new journey, with the right people.

FYA has always been one of the most unique vascular meetings —
interactive, open, and genuinely focused on how innovation reaches real clinical practice.

Standing in London, we are proud to be part of this community.
Not just attending, but connecting — ideas, people, and continents.

From the aortic arch to the tips of the toes,
FYA reminds us why collaboration matters.

This is where our new journey begins.

Professor Shu Chang's team from Fuwai Hospital, China, in collaboration with Sun Yat-sen University, China, has achieved...
26/02/2026

Professor Shu Chang's team from Fuwai Hospital, China, in collaboration with Sun Yat-sen University, China, has achieved a world-first innovation with magnetically controlled injectable adhesive hydrogels, opening a new pathway for vascular interventional embolization therapy.

1.Research Background: Clinical Challenges in Vascular Repair

Vascular abnormalities, such as ruptured intracranial aneurysms, hemorrhage from arteriovenous malformations, and type II endoleaks following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms, often lead to severe consequences. Current treatment modalities have significant limitations:
Metallic Coil Embolization: The occlusion rate is approximately 66%, making it difficult to achieve complete and stable aneurysm sealing.
Liquid Polymer Embolic Agents: The clinical success rate is about 68.4%, and they are prone to being washed away in the dynamic blood flow environment, making firm adhesion challenging.
Biological Environmental Challenges: Red blood cells, platelets, and plasma proteins in the blood can interfere with the contact between the hydrogel and the vessel wall, compromising the adhesion effect.
Consequently, the development of novel embolic materials that can be rapidly positioned, firmly adhere within dynamic blood flow, and possess excellent biocompatibility has become a critical clinical challenge that needs to be addressed.

2.Material Design: Synergistic Construction of Multifunctional iMAH

Component A
Main Ingredients: Quaternized chitosan, γ-Fe₂O₃@PDA nanoparticles, catechol-modified gelatin, metformin.
Function/Role: Magnetic responsiveness, tissue adhesion, stable dispersion.

Component B
Main Ingredients: Oxidized hyaluronic acid (with aldehyde groups)
Function/Role: Rapid cross-linking (via Schiff base formation)

Component C
Main Ingredients: Sodium periodate (NaIO₄)
Function/Role: Enhanced adhesion strength (via oxidative cross-linking)

Key Innovations:
Magnetic Responsiveness: The γ-Fe₂O₃@PDA nanoparticles exhibit excellent superparamagnetism (saturation magnetization of 49.2 emu/g), enabling targeted delivery guided by an external magnetic field.
Rapid Crosslinking: The material forms a gel approximately 2 seconds after mixing components A and B, effectively preventing it from being washed away by blood flow.
Enhanced Tissue Adhesion: Catechol groups chemically react with amino/thiol groups on the tissue surface. NaIO₄ further promotes oxidative crosslinking to form a dual-network structure, achieving an adhesion strength of up to 71 kPa.
Flowability Control: The introduction of Metformin (an FDA-approved drug) inhibits the physical solidification of gelatin at room temperature, ensuring smooth injectability.

3. Magnetically Controlled Delivery System: Precise Navigation with a Five-Axis Robot

To achieve precise intravascular delivery, the research team developed a five-axis magnetically controlled vascular robot system. Comprising four cylindrical permanent magnets and one central spherical magnet, this system generates a controllable magnetic field of 80–100 mT at the target site.

System Advantages:

Spatial Localization: By integrating optical localization with DSA imaging, it enables precise registration between the target site and the magnetic field.
Multi-DOF Control: Supports three translational (x, y, z) and two angular (α, β) movements, allowing flexible adjustment of the magnetic field direction.
Magnetic Force-Assisted Adhesion: The magnetic field presses the hydrogel against the vascular wall, extruding interfacial fluid to promote tissue contact and adhesion.
In Vitro Validation:
In simulated blood flow at 20 cm/s, iMAH can be magnetically guided into an aneurysm model.
Under dynamic blood pressure of 80–120 mmHg, iMAH achieves vascular embolization within approximately 5 minutes, with a leakage rate below 1/1000.

4.Functional Validation In Vitro and In Vivo

1. Wound Hemostasis and Vascular Embolization
Rat Liver Hemorrhage Model: Magnetically delivered iMAH achieved hemostasis within 14.6 ± 2.5 seconds, reducing blood loss by approximately 86%, significantly outperforming the non-magnetic control group.
Static Vascular Sealing Test: iMAH withstood a burst pressure of approximately 100 mmHg after embolizing blood vessels.
Dynamic Vascular Sealing Test: In a simulated Type II endoleak model, iMAH completely sealed branch arteries within 5 minutes under a blood flow pressure of 80 mmHg.

2. Blood Compatibility and Cytotoxicity
Hemolysis rate < 5%, meeting safety standards for biological materials.
Human umbilical vein endothelial cells cultured for 1–3 days showed no significant difference in proliferation rate compared to the control group, indicating no cytotoxicity.

3. Subcutaneous Implantation and In Vivo Degradation
Six weeks after subcutaneous implantation in rats, approximately 44.39% of the iMAH mass remained, demonstrating controlled degradation.
Serum markers for liver, heart, and kidney function showed no significant differences compared to the control group.
Histological examination of major organs revealed no abnormalities, suggesting good histocompatibility.

5.Large Animal Experiment: Embolization of Beagle Lumbar Arteries

To simulate a Type II endoleak following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, the research team selected the third pair of lumbar arteries in a beagle dog model as the target vessels.

Experimental Procedure:

1. Preoperative Localization: Preoperative CT and intraoperative DSA were used to precisely locate the target vessels (approximately 1.8–2 mm in diameter, at a depth of about 52 mm).
2. Stent Deployment: A covered stent was partially deployed, preserving the ostia of the lumbar arteries.
3. Magnetic Field Application: The five-axis magnetically controlled robot applied an 80 mT magnetic field, precisely oriented toward the target lumbar artery.
4. iMAH Delivery: A 100 μL bolus of iMAH was delivered via a microcatheter, and the magnetic field was maintained for 10 minutes to ensure precise positioning and adhesion.
5. Postoperative Confirmation: Postoperative angiography confirmed complete occlusion of the target vessel, after which the instruments were withdrawn.

Results:
Immediate Outcome: Postoperative angiography showed complete occlusion of the target vessels, with no observable blood flow.
Follow-up (2 Months Post-Procedure): The beagle demonstrated a steady increase in body weight, and all blood biochemical parameters remained within normal ranges.
Histological Analysis: Histological examination of the heart, liver, spleen, lungs, and kidneys revealed no abnormalities.

6.Conclusion and Clinical Implications

This study has successfully designed and validated a magnetically controlled injectable adhesive hydrogel (iMAH) that integrates key advantages, including rapid crosslinking, magnetic-responsive navigation, strong tissue adhesion, and excellent biocompatibility. When combined with a five-axis magnetically controlled robotic system, this technology enables precise delivery and robust embolization within complex hemodynamic environments, offering a novel therapeutic strategy for the following clinical scenarios:

- Ruptured intracranial aneurysms;
- Embolization of arteriovenous malformations;
- Occlusion of Type II endoleaks following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair;
- Hemostasis for traumatic vascular rupture;
- Precision drug delivery in transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).

Future Perspectives:
- Further optimization of the magnetic control system's navigational capabilities within tortuous vessels.
- Validation of therapeutic efficacy in disease models such as aneurysms and aortic dissections.
- Advancement of material processing and delivery system standardization to facilitate clinical translation.

15/02/2026

🎆 Wishing you a joyful Chinese New Year! We look forward to continuing our journey together in the year ahead.

Clinical Reflection: How to Balance the Benefits and Risks of Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS)?When managing symptomatic or...
06/02/2026

Clinical Reflection: How to Balance the Benefits and Risks of Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS)?

When managing symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis, how do we determine the optimal timing for intervention? How can embolic events be prevented during the procedure? What personalized approaches should be taken for postoperative anticoagulation? This review provides systematic insights, and we look forward to engaging in deeper discussions with you!

Carotid atherosclerotic stenosis is a significant and modifiable cause of ischemic stroke. Carotid artery stenting (CAS), as a minimally invasive method for revascularization, holds substantial value in stroke prevention for patients with clear indications. This article systematically reviews the pathophysiological basis, patient selection, key surgical techniques, perioperative management, and long-term follow-up strategies for CAS.

Carotid stenosis leads to cerebral ischemia through two primary mechanisms:

1. Hemodynamic Impairment (Chronic Hypoperfusion): Severe stenosis (>70%) places distal brain tissue at the "compensatory edge," making it susceptible to watershed infarction during blood pressure fluctuations.

2. Artery-to-Artery Embolism: Microemboli detach from unstable plaques (ulcerated, lipid-rich necrotic core, thin fibrous cap), causing TIA or cerebral infarction.

The core goals of revascularization are to improve cerebral perfusion and eliminate the source of embolism, with its preventive value far exceeding salvage therapy after infarction.

Indications and Patient Selection for CAS

An individualized strategy combining "high-risk patient, high-risk plaque" should be followed.

Symptomatic Stenosis:

-Ipsilateral ischemic event + non-invasive imaging confirming stenosis ≥50% (NASCET method).

-Intervention should also be considered for stenosis of 50%-69% with the following features:

Recent (≤6 months) ischemic event;

Imaging suggesting plaque ulceration;

Recurrent events despite medical therapy.

Asymptomatic Stenosis:

The traditional indication is stenosis ≥70% with a life expectancy >5 years.

Risk stratification using multimodal imaging is recommended. Intervention benefit may be increased in patients with:

High-risk plaque features: MRI showing intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH), thin/ruptured fibrous cap (LRNC), or ultrasound indicating hypoechoic plaque;

Reduced cerebral perfusion reserve (confirmed by CTP/MRP).

Special Populations:

Elderly (>80 years): Requires comprehensive assessment of general condition and anatomy; CEA may be preferable.

Tandem lesions: Prioritize treatment of the culprit lesion; evaluate staged or concurrent surgical strategy.

Key Surgical Techniques

1. Routine Use of Embolic Protection Devices (EPD):

Filter-type EPDs are most commonly used and should be selected based on vessel diameter and tortuosity of the access path.

Proximal balloon occlusion-type EPDs are suitable for "soft plaques" or cases with high intraprocedural embolic risk.

2. Stent Selection and Deployment Strategy:

Open-cell stents offer good flexibility, suitable for tortuous vessels.

Closed-cell stents provide strong radial force and better plaque coverage, suitable for heavily calcified lesions.

Deployment should be slow and precise, ensuring the stent fully covers the lesion and is anchored in healthy vessel segments.

3. Perioperative Hemodynamic Management:

Prophylactic use of vasopressors (e.g., dopamine) during the procedure to maintain heart rate.

Postoperative continuous invasive blood pressure monitoring for ≥24 hours, vigilance for vagal reflex and myocardial ischemia.

4. Prevention and Control of Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome (CHS):

High-risk factors: Long-standing severe stenosis, contralateral occlusion, poorly controlled blood pressure.

Prevention & Control: Preoperative BP control (e.g.,

[Academic Frontiers | Endovascular Reconstruction of Supra-Aortic Branches and Prevention of Neurological Complications]...
05/02/2026

[Academic Frontiers | Endovascular Reconstruction of Supra-Aortic Branches and Prevention of Neurological Complications]

In endovascular repair of aortic arch pathologies, reconstruction of supra-aortic branches is critical, yet neurological complications remain a major perioperative challenge.

This article provides a comprehensive analysis of complication mechanisms, risk differences among various techniques (chimney/fenestration/branch stents), and proposes systematic prevention and management strategies, offering evidence-based guidance for clinical practice.

In endovascular repair of aortic arch pathologies, reconstruction of supra-aortic branches is critical, yet neurological complications remain a major perioperative challenge. This article provides a comprehensive analysis of complication mechanisms, risk differences among various techniques (chimney/fenestration/branch stents), and proposes systematic prevention and management strategies, offering evidence-based guidance for clinical practice.Endovascular repair of aortic arch pathologies (e.g., aortic dissection, aneurysm) often requires reconstruction of supra-aortic branches to maintain cerebral blood flow. Neurological complications are among the most common and serious perioperative complications of such procedures. This article systematically reviews the mechanisms of these complications, compares the neurological risks associated with different reconstruction techniques (e.g., parallel stents, pre-fenestration, in situ fenestration, multibranch stents), and proposes strategies for prevention, early recognition, and management to provide guidance for clinical practice.

1. Patient-Specific Factors
Common comorbidities such as coronary artery disease, intracranial arterial stenosis, or aneurysms increase the risk of perioperative stroke.

2. Procedure-Related Embolism

-Embolism due to contact of guidewires, balloons, or stents with atherosclerotic plaques or mural thrombi.

-Air embolism from stent delivery systems or incomplete bubble removal during contrast injection.

-Formation of platelet microthrombi during prolonged procedures with insufficient heparinization.

3. Stent Graft-Related Factors

-Prolonged occlusion of branch vessels during coverage or reconstruction.

-Compression, stenosis, or occlusion of branch stents leading to cerebral hypoperfusion.

4. Hemodynamic Instability

-Intraoperative hypotension or prolonged hypotension, especially in elderly patients or those with multiple comorbidities, increases the risk of cerebral ischemia.

Comparison of Neurological Complications by Reconstruction Technique
Parallel Stent Techniques:Techniques such as chimney and periscope. Simple operation and short procedure time, but high risk of endoleak. Increased number of chimney stents (especially double/twin chimneys) raises the risk of adverse events (including neurological complications).

Pre-fenestration Techniques: Divided into in vitro pre-fenestration and custom-made pre-fenestration. Increased number of fenestrations (especially triple fenestration) may raise the risk of stroke. Custom fenestration improves accuracy and reduces procedure time.

In Situ Fenestration Techniques: Requires temporary blocking of branch blood flow, increasing neurological risk. Laser/radiofrequency fenestration may generate embolic material due to thermal effects. Currently reported incidence of neurological complications is relatively low (approximately 1%-2%).

Multibranch Stent Techniques: Complex procedure with relatively high risk of neurological complications. Triple-branch stents carry higher risk than single/double-branch stents. Currently no commercially available products; still in the research stage.

Data Insights:Perioperative stroke rates: chimney techniques (~0.9%-16.1%), pre-fenestration (~2%-5.4%), in situ fenestration (~1.16%-2%), and multibranch stents (~8%-20%).

Prevention Strategies for Neurological Complications

1. Preoperative Assessment and Preparation
Imaging evaluation: High-resolution CTA/MRA to assess aortic arch morphology, calcification, plaque distribution (especially along the greater curvature), branch vessel origins, and integrity of the Willis circle.

Medication management: Statins for plaque stabilization and antiplatelet therapy as needed.

Assessment of the left subclavian artery: Evaluate the necessity of coverage and compensatory capacity of the Willis circle; consider bypass/reconstruction if indicated.


2. Intraoperative Cerebral Protection Measures
-Anticoagulation management: Adequate heparinization to maintain ACT > 250 seconds.

-Flow control: Rapid ventricular pacing or pharmacologic hypotension (e.g., sodium nitroprusside) to reduce blood flow impact.

-Embolic protection: Use embolic protection devices (e.g., SpiderFX) in branches such as the carotid artery.

-Precise positioning: Utilize fusion imaging, roadmap guidance, etc., to ensure accurate stent alignment.

-Hemodynamic monitoring: Invasive arterial pressure monitoring to avoid prolonged hypotension.

3. Multimodal Neurological Monitoring

Real-time monitoring of cerebral perfusion and function using transcranial Doppler, cerebral oximetry, somatosensory/motor evoked potentials, etc.

Early Recognition and Management of Complications
1. Intraoperative and Immediate Postoperative Period
-Angiographic review: Multi-angle, multi-phase evaluation for endoleaks, stent morphology, and branch patency.

-Neurological assessment: Immediate evaluation of consciousness, pupils, limb movement, and speech upon anesthesia recovery.

-Management of abnormalities: If abnormalities are detected, initiate stroke protocol immediately (Head CT/MRI, Thrombectomy/Thrombolysis if necessary).

2. Early Postoperative Period (During Hospitalization)
-Intensive care: Monitor vital signs, neurological function, urine output, and lower limb perfusion for at least 24–48 hours.

-Imaging review: Perform CTA within 3–7 days postoperatively to assess stent status, endoleaks, and branch patency.

The prevention and management of perioperative neurological complications in endovascular reconstruction of supra-aortic branches is a systematic endeavor, with key aspects including:

1.Preoperative meticulous planning: Individualized assessment of anatomy and patient status.

2.Intraoperative precision: Integration of cerebral protection strategies and multimodal monitoring.

3.Postoperative intensive monitoring: Early imaging review and rapid response mechanisms.

4.Multidisciplinary collaboration: Cooperation among vascular surgery, anesthesiology, neurology, radiology, and other relevant teams.

5.Technological advancements: Customized stents, standardized fenestration, fusion navigation, and other technologies hold promise for further reducing neurological complications.

Vasco Knight ✨Happy New Year 2026As we welcome the brand new year of 2026, we extend our warmest New Year greetings to a...
31/12/2025

Vasco Knight ✨Happy New Year 2026

As we welcome the brand new year of 2026, we extend our warmest New Year greetings to all our esteemed academic colleagues and partners across the globe.

May this year bring fruitful collaborations, groundbreaking insights and continuous progress in academic exploration and knowledge sharing.

Vasco Knight spearheads international academic exchange by engaging with major symposiums worldwide.Let us forge ahead hand in hand, to connect, collaborate and innovate together for greater achievements in the new year.

Wishing you a prosperous, healthy and inspiring 2026!

31/12/2025

👍Save the Date! FYA 2026 Get Ready!

An honor and a pleasure! In this special video, the course director of FYA 2026—Professor Lorenzo Patrone, and two co-course director Professor Michel Bosiers, Professor Michael Lichtenberg—extend their sincere welcome to our expert from China.

The Vasco Knight platform is dedicated to fostering academic collaboration, connecting leading cardiovascular expertise from China with the global cardiovascular community. This time, we are heading to London UK. FYA (Forum for Young Angiologists) represents a mindset—not an age. It’s a dynamic, forward-thinking community where clinical logic, real-world cases, and open debate take center stage.

Wishing FYA a successful event! May every participant have a successful and inspiring journey!

Click the link below to register!
https://fya-congress.com
FYA 2026
Date:February 26-28,2026
Location:London,UK

Follow us: Vasco Knight on Facebook & Linkedin

30/12/2025

⏳Save the Date! Vasco Knight @ FYA 2026

Here is a message from Professor Shu Chang, Chairman of Vasco Knight at Beijing Fuwai Hospital. Let's see what insights he has to offer.

The Vasco Knight platform is dedicated to fostering academic collaboration, connecting leading cardiovascular expertise from China with the global cardiovascular community. This time, we are heading to London UK. FYA (Forum for Young Angiologists) represents a mindset—not an age. It’s a dynamic, forward-thinking community where clinical logic, real-world cases, and open debate take center stage.

We look forward to in-depth cooperation and jointly witnessing the future development of the cardiovascular field.

✨Wishing FYA a great success! May every participant have a successful and inspiring journey!

Click the link below to register!
https://fya-congress.com
FYA 2026
Date:February 26-28,2026
Location:London,UK

Follow us: Vasco Knight on Facebook & Linkedin

Address

London

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Vasco Knight posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Vasco Knight:

Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest Share on Reddit Share via Email
Share on WhatsApp Share on Instagram Share on Telegram