04/12/2025
The debate around the validity of diagnoses of the neurodivergent spectrum rages today. It’s interesting that it is so enlivening for so many people. Perhaps because this area highlights the limitations of medicalisation and has become more about the politics of funding than the support of the individual.
Neurodiversity is neurological human experience that leads to many outcomes which are medically indisputable: from low Self Esteem, to a vulnerability to trauma, to a higher prevalence of OCD thinking, depression, anxiety, and maladaptive coping strategies like addiction or isolation and health outcomes like the increasingly prevalent dysautonomia’s. Whether an individual seeks diagnosis or sees value in that label, is surely a personal concern and an issue of cognitive liberty. How they choose to move forward with that is also a personal choice.
What I would notice is the one thing that seems universally helpful in getting the diagnosis whether 6 or 60 – is the blossoming of self-awareness, understanding and compassion that was generally preceded by a very critical inner voice. In my clinical experience this leads to happier, healthier individuals who are able to re-engage with school, work and the world with a better understanding of how to manage their needs. The rest is politics.