Trevor Lawrence

Trevor Lawrence Mr Trevor Lawrence is a consultant orthopaedic surgeon based in Birmingham and the West Midlands, UK.

He specialises in hip and knee replacements, including hip, knee & revision hip surgery.

Once we cross the 60-year threshold, our bodies begin to change in subtle but significant ways. Nuts have long been hail...
06/04/2025

Once we cross the 60-year threshold, our bodies begin to change in subtle but significant ways. Nuts have long been hailed as nature's perfect snack, rich in healthy fats, fibre, protein, and essential nutrients.

Nuts can be powerful allies in healthy ageing, supporting heart function, cognitive health, blood pressure, and bones.

30/08/2024

HIP REPLACEMENT - OVERVIEW

A hip replacement is a common type of surgery where a damaged hip joint is replaced with an artificial one (known as an implant).

Adults of any age can be considered for a hip replacement, although most are done on people between the ages of 60 and 80.

A modern artificial hip joint is designed to last for at least 15 years. Most people have a significant reduction in pain and improvement in their range of movement.

Follow link below to learn more.

https://www.trevorlawrence.co.uk/post/hip-replacement-overview

Knee replacement surgery (arthroplasty) is a common operation that involves replacing a damaged, worn or diseased knee w...
30/08/2024

Knee replacement surgery (arthroplasty) is a common operation that involves replacing a damaged, worn or diseased knee with an artificial joint.

Adults of any age can be considered for a knee replacement, although most are carried out on people between the ages of 60 and 80.

A smaller operation called a partial knee replacement tends to be performed on younger people aged between 55 and 64 where the artificial joint is expected to need redoing within 10 years.

Knee replacement surgery (arthroplasty) is a common operation that involves replacing a damaged, worn or diseased knee with an artificial joint. Adults of any age can be considered for a knee replacement, although most are carried out on people between the ages of 60 and 80. A smaller operation call...

My team and I are thrilled to announce the launch of our brand-new Hip & Knee Clinic website! 🌐Whether you need expert a...
29/08/2024

My team and I are thrilled to announce the launch of our brand-new Hip & Knee Clinic website! 🌐

Whether you need expert advice on hip or knee pain, considering joint replacement surgery, or just want to learn more about the treatments we offer, our new website has everything you need!

Mr Trevor Lawrence, based in Solihull - Birmingham - West Midlands, is one of the leading Hip & Knee Replacement and Revision specialists, consistently delivering world-class​​ outcomes for all his patients, celebrating over 20 years​ of exceptional long-term orthopaedic surgery results.

Research: HIP REPLACEMENTS - SOME SURGICAL APPROACHES ARE BETTER THAN OTHERS, RESEARCH SUGGESTShttps://evidence.nihr.ac....
05/12/2021

Research: HIP REPLACEMENTS - SOME SURGICAL APPROACHES ARE BETTER THAN OTHERS, RESEARCH SUGGESTS

https://evidence.nihr.ac.uk/alert/hip-replacement-surgery-lateral-approach-worse-outcomes/

Author: National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
First published on 8 December 2020
doi: 10.3310/alert_42879

A common surgical approach used for hip replacements carries higher risks of worse outcomes and should not be routinely adopted by trainee surgeons, a new analysis suggests.

The study found significantly worse outcomes associated with so-called lateral procedures to the hip joint, in which surgeons access the hip by detaching muscle from the side of the thighbone (femur). Lateral procedures were compared with alternative methods in which the surgeon approaches the hip from in front of (anterior approach), or behind (posterior approach), the thighbone.

Analysis of 723,904 hip replacement operations performed between 2003 and 2016 found that lateral procedures were associated with more deaths and a greater risk of further hip surgery.

The researchers suggest it is probably unwise to ask experienced surgeons to change from using the lateral approach. However, new surgeons should be taught to use other approaches when performing hip replacements.

What’s the issue?
More than 100,000 hip replacement operations are carried out in the UK each year, and surgeons can access the hip joint using different approaches. The most commonly used is the posterior approach, in which surgeons access the hip from behind the thighbone. Other approaches include accessing the hip from in front of the thighbone (anterior) or, in about one in three operations, surgeons use the lateral approach and reach the hip by detaching muscle from the side of the femur. Each approach can be performed through a small (minimally invasive) cut or a standard, longer cut.

The different approaches cause different amounts of soft tissue damage and bleeding. It has been assumed that patients’ recovery, their chances of needing further surgery, and the potential adverse outcomes will be influenced by the approach used. But, before this study, there was little large-scale evidence to assess and compare the outcomes from all of the different surgical approaches.

What’s new?
The study used data collected by the National Joint Registry to identify 723,904 primary total hip replacements carried out between 2003 and 2016 in England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.

It cross-referenced these data to reports of how the patients fared after surgery. Specifically, it looked at the risk of further (revision) surgery in the long-term, and the risk of death three months after surgery. Data on patient-reported outcomes such as pain, mobility and adverse outcomes six months after surgery were also reviewed. The study compared these outcomes for each surgical method.

Statistical analysis suggested the lateral approach had worse outcomes than the posterior approach.

Compared to the posterior approach, the lateral approach:
- was predicted to have an increased risk (between 5% and 12%) of revision surgery at 12 years
- was predicted to have a 15% increased risk of death within three months of surgery
- was associated with only slightly more reports from patients of pain and mobility issues.
- Overall, the study found that the posterior approach had the lowest risk of revision surgery.

Lateral or anterior approaches carried out using minimally-invasive techniques carried an increased risk of further surgery, but the difference was less certain in models accounting for patients' body mass index. The researchers, therefore, said the data supported the continued use of minimally-invasive techniques at this time.

Why is this important?
This is the largest study to compare the outcomes from the different ways of performing a common operation. The study was observational and cannot prove that the surgical approach caused the differences in outcomes. However, the data strongly indicate worse outcomes with the lateral approach. It was associated with more deaths and a greater risk of revision surgery.

More than 20,000 hip replacements are performed each year in the UK using the lateral approach, and the study authors argue new surgeons should not routinely use it.

A better option, they say, is posterior approach surgery, which is already the most common. At present, NICE guidelines state surgeons can choose a posterior or lateral approach for hip replacement.

What’s next?
The study authors say their findings parallel those from small studies and should be used to inform clinical practice when NICE and other bodies update guidelines. They suggest that surgeons should be steered away from the lateral approach for hip replacement. The posterior approach should be considered the preferred standard approach, they say, and should be used in training new surgeons. They acknowledge that it might be difficult to safely convert experienced surgeons familiar with the lateral approach to a new approach.

Ideally, the findings of this large but observational study would be checked in a randomised controlled trial. Such a trial could compare the possible benefits of the minimally-invasive posterior approach, the conventional anterior approach and the conventional posterior approach. The present study suggests that these approaches may have the best outcomes.

10/10/2020

The self-funding surgery should resume to full strength this January.

At present, there is a limited capacity for private surgery. Prioritisation is depended on the severity of patients’ symptoms.

There is still a two-week self-isolation requirement before operations can take place. 72 hours before surgery, all patients are required to have a pre-operative coronavirus test, organised at Spire Parkway Hospital.

To book your face-to-face or online consultation, please contact Jenny at our clinic.

02/10/2020

Surgery performed by Mr Trevor Lawrence
Consultant at University Hospital Birmingham

NHS TO LAUNCH GROUNDBREAKING ONLINE COVID-19 REHAB SERVICETens of thousands of people who are suffering long-term effect...
15/07/2020

NHS TO LAUNCH GROUNDBREAKING ONLINE COVID-19 REHAB SERVICE

Tens of thousands of people who are suffering long-term effects of coronavirus will benefit from a revolutionary on-demand recovery service, the head of the NHS has announced today.

5 July 2020 - NHS article.

https://www.england.nhs.uk/2020/07/nhs-to-launch-ground-breaking-online-covid-19-rehab-service/

Nurses and physiotherapists will be on hand to reply to patients’ needs either online or over the phone as part of the service.

The new ‘Your COVID Recovery’ service forms part of NHS plans to expand access to COVID-19 rehabilitation treatments for those who have survived the virus but still have problems with breathing, mental health problems or other complications.

Coming on the day of the NHS’s anniversary, chief executive Sir Simon Stevens has hailed the new service as a great example of the way the health service is increasingly harnessing technology and innovation to enhance the face to face care that doctors, nurses, therapists and other staff can provide in a safe and convenient way.

It follows the building of a new Seacole rehabilitation centre to help those most seriously affected by the deadly virus, with similar facilities expected to open across the country.
Patients who have been in hospital or suffered at home with the virus will have access to a face-to-face consultation with their local rehabilitation team, usually comprising of physiotherapists, nurses and mental health specialists.

Following this initial assessment, those who need it will be offered a personalised package of online-based aftercare lasting up to 12 weeks, available later this Summer.
Accessible, on-demand, from the comfort of their own home, this will include:
Access to a local clinical team including nurses and physiotherapists who can respond either online or over the phone to any enquiries from patients;
An online peer-support community for survivors – particularly helpful for those who may be recovering at home alone;
Exercise tutorials that people can do from home to help them regain muscle strength and lung function in particular, and;
Mental health support, which may include a psychologist within the online hub or referral into NHS mental health services along with information on what to expect post-COVID.
Sir Simon Stevens said: “COVID-19 has been the biggest challenge in the NHS’s history, and the fact that we have come through the first peak without services being overwhelmed and being able to give expert care to everyone who needed it, is testament all our frontline and support staff.

“Now, as we celebrate the birthday of the NHS and look ahead to the next phase of our response, while in-person care will continue to be vital, the health service is embracing the best that new technology can offer us to meet the significant level of new and ongoing need.

“Rolling out Your COVID Recovery, alongside expanding and strengthening community health and care services, is another example of how the NHS must bring the old and the new together to create better and more convenient services for patients.”

NHS staff responded rapidly to the COVID-19 outbreak to care for more than 100,000 patients in hospital, and many more in the community.

Thanks to their efforts everyone who could benefit from care was able to get it, and the overwhelming majority survived.

However, evidence shows that many of those survivors are likely to have significant on-going health problems, including breathing difficulties, enduring tiredness, reduced muscle function, impaired ability to perform vital everyday tasks and mental health problems such as PTSD, anxiety and depression.

The online portal will help ensure that people get the support they need to recover from the effects of the virus, including those associated with spending a long time on ventilation, while reducing the need to physically attend appointments for many.
The first phase of the service will launch later this month, providing the latest advice on recovering from the virus, which will be available to all and continually improved and added to.

The second phase, in which people who need it will be able to access personalised support packages, is in development by experts based in Leicester and will be made available later in the summer.

In order to access this part of the site, patients will first attend a face-to-face assessment, which may include a walking test, to help personalise care and ensure people get the type of support and rehabilitation specific to their need, rather than a one-size-fits-all approach.

For those who need ongoing care, they will be given a log-in to the new online site, which will be accessible from any web-enabled phone, tablet, television or computer.
Where patients don’t already have access to a suitable device to use the online platform, printed materials will be made depending upon demand to ensure the service is accessible to all.

Rehabilitation professionals will be able to access their patient’s data to enable remote care and monitoring, ensuring that anyone who might need further face-to-face checks or treatment can get it.

Professor Sally Singh with a team from University Hospitals of Leicester NHS has been working with national clinical leaders to build the service and is now working with the NHS nationally to roll it out across the country.

Professor Singh from the University of Leicester said: “We know the impact of COVID on people can be far reaching and complex, ‘Your COVID Recovery’ is specifically designed to support people in their recovery post-coronavirus, this will be one of the first sites in the world rolled out nationally seeking to address potential post-COVID symptoms and support people on the road to recovery.

“We have brought together a wide range of experts representing a number of professional societies who have made valuable contributions to the site, to allow us to have a comprehensive package of information and advice. Importantly we have worked with people with first-hand experience of COVID to help shape the site and make sure the content was fit for purpose.”

Alongside bringing back non-urgent services in a safe way and maintaining a high state of readiness for any future increase in COVID cases, local health leaders are currently working with councils and voluntary groups to plan how they will meet the additional ongoing demand for rehabilitation services post-COVID.

While in many cases these services will be delivered by or within existing NHS facilities, where necessary plans may include using temporary facilities like the first NHS Seacole Centre, a dedicated rehabilitation and step-down facility which opened in Surrey at the end of May.

Health and high quality care for all, now and for future generations

01/07/2020

GREAT NEWS - surgery for self-funding & insured patients restarts on Saturday, July 4th.

There is, however, a requirement for a two-week self-isolation period before surgery can take place.



72 hours before surgery, every patient is required to have a pre-operative coronavirus test.

Please contact Jenny to book ZOOM video consultation, and get the latest update on face-to-face appointments.



Stay safe. Stay healthy.

14/05/2020

NHS ADVICE ON HOW TO TREAT CORONAVIRUS SYMPTOMS AT HOME

There is currently no specific treatment for coronavirus (COVID-19), but you can often ease the symptoms at home until you recover.

If you have a high temperature, it can help to:

- Get lots of rest

- Drink plenty of fluids (water is best) to avoid dehydration

- Drink enough so your urine is light yellow and clear

- Take Paracetamol or Ibuprofen if you feel uncomfortable

- - -

TREATING A COUGH

If you have a cough, it's best to avoid lying on your back. Lie on your side or sit upright instead.

To help ease a cough, try having a teaspoon of honey. But do not give honey to babies under 12 months.

If this does not help, you could contact a pharmacist for advice about cough treatments.Information:

Do not go to a pharmacy in person. If you or someone you live with has coronavirus symptoms, you should all stay at home.Try calling or contacting the pharmacy online instead.Things to try if you're feeling breathless

If you're feeling breathless, it can help to keep your room cool.Try turning the heating down or opening a window. Do not use a fan as it may spread the virus.

- - -

YOU COULD ALSO TRY:

Breathing slowly in through your nose and out through your mouth, with your lips together like you're gently blowing out a candle

Sitting upright in a chair

Relaxing your shoulders, so you're not hunched leaning forward slightly – support yourself by putting your hands on your knees or on something stable like a chair.

Try not to panic if you're feeling breathless. This can make things worse.

- - -

WHAT TO DO IF YOUR SYMPTOMS GET WORSE?
It's important to get medical help if your symptoms get worse.

URGENT ADVICE:

- Use the 111 online coronavirus service if:

- You feel you cannot cope with your symptoms at home

- Your symptoms get worse and you're not sure what to do

ONLY CALL 111 IF YOU CANNOT GET HELP ONLINE.

CORONAVIRUS - BUSTING THE MYTHSThe rapid spread of the coronavirus has sparked worldwide alarm. The World Health Organis...
28/03/2020

CORONAVIRUS - BUSTING THE MYTHS

The rapid spread of the coronavirus has sparked worldwide alarm. The World Health Organisation (WHO) has declared this rapidly spreading outbreak a pandemic. Many countries are struggling with a rise in confirmed cases. All over the world people are advised to be prepared for disruptions to daily life, causing stress to individuals, families and communities. Our fears arise from a misaligned ratio of stress to resiliency. The more resilient we become the less stress we will feel. But this is a subject that I will be expanding on further in my future posts.

Here's an edited version of a recent Harvard Medical School article on the subject.

https://www.health.harvard.edu/diseases-and-conditions/coronavirus-resource-center

- - -

CAN VITAMIN C BE USED TO TREAT PATIENTS WITH COVID-19?

Some critically ill patients with COVID-19 have been treated with high doses of intravenous (IV) vitamin C in the hope that it will hasten recovery. However, there is no clear or convincing scientific evidence that it works for COVID-19 infections, and it is not a standard part of treatment for this new infection. A study is underway in China to determine if this treatment is useful for patients with severe COVID-19; results are expected in the fall.

The idea that high-dose IV vitamin C might help in overwhelming infections is not new. A 2017 study (https://journal.chestnet.org/article/S0012-3692(16)62564-3/fulltext) found that high-dose IV vitamin C treatment (along with thiamine and corticosteroids) appeared to prevent deaths among people with sepsis, a form of overwhelming infection causing dangerously low blood pressure and organ failure. Another study (https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2752063) published last year assessed the effect of high-dose vitamin C infusions among patients with severe infections who had sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), in which the lungs fill with fluid. While the study's main measures of improvement did not improve within the first four days of vitamin C therapy, there was a lower death rate at 28 days among treated patients. Though neither of these studies looked at vitamin C use in patients with COVID-19, the vitamin therapy was specifically given for sepsis and ARDS, and these are the most common conditions leading to intensive care unit admission, ventilator support, or death among those with severe COVID-19 infections.

Regarding prevention, there is no evidence that taking vitamin C will help prevent infection with the coronavirus that causes COVID-19. While standard doses of vitamin C are generally harmless, high doses can cause a number of side effects, including nausea, cramps, and an increased risk of kidney stones.

- - -

IS THE ANTIVIRAL DRUG REMDESIVIR EFFECTIVE FOR TREATING COVID-19?

Scientists all over the world are testing whether drugs previously developed to treat other viral infections might also be effective against the new coronavirus that causes COVID-19.

One drug that has received a lot of attention is the antiviral drug Remdesivir. That's because the coronavirus that causes COVID-19 is similar to the coronaviruses that caused the diseases SARS and MERS — and evidence from laboratory and animal studies suggests that Remdesivir may help limit the reproduction and spread of these viruses in the body. In particular, there is a critical part of all three viruses that can be targeted by drugs. That critical part, which makes an important enzyme that the virus needs to reproduce, is virtually identical in all three coronaviruses; drugs like Remdesivir that successfully hit that target in the viruses that cause SARS and MERS are likely to work against the COVID-19 virus.

Remdesivir was developed to treat several other severe viral diseases, including the disease caused by Ebola virus (not a coronavirus). It works by inhibiting the ability of the coronavirus to reproduce and make copies of itself: if it can't reproduce, it can't make copies that spread and infect other cells and other parts of the body.

Remdesivir inhibited the ability of the coronaviruses that cause SARS and MERS to infect cells in a laboratory dish. The drug also was effective in treating these coronaviruses in animals: there was a reduction in the amount of virus in the body, and also an improvement in lung disease caused by the virus.

The drug appears to be effective in the laboratory dish, in protecting cells against infection by the COVID virus (as is true of the SARS and MERS coronaviruses), but more studies are underway to confirm that this is true.

Remdesivir was used in the first case of COVID-19 that occurred in Washington state, in January 2020. The patient was severely ill, but survived. Of course, experience in one patient does not prove the drug is effective.

Two large randomised clinical trials are underway in China. The two trials will enrol over 700 patients and are likely to definitively answer the question of whether the drug is effective in treating COVID-19. The results of those studies are expected in April or May 2020. Studies also are underway in the United States, including at several Harvard-affiliated hospitals. It is hard to predict when the drug could be approved for use and produced in large amounts, assuming the clinical trials indicate that it is effective and safe.

- - -

IS A LOST SENSE OF SMELL A SYMPTOM OF COVID-19? WHAT SHOULD I DO IF I LOSE MY SENSE OF SMELL?

Increasing evidence suggests that a lost sense of smell, known medically as anosmia, may be a symptom of COVID-19. This is not surprising, because viral infections are a leading cause of loss of sense of smell, and COVID-19 is caused by a virus. Still, loss of smell might help doctors identify people who do not have other symptoms, but who might be infected with the COVID-19 virus — and who might be unwittingly infecting others.

A statement written by a group of ear, nose and throat specialists (otolaryngologists) in the United Kingdom reported that in Germany, two out of three confirmed COVID-19 cases had a loss of sense of smell; in South Korea, 30% of people with mild symptoms who tested positive for COVID-19 reported anosmia as their main symptom.
On March 22nd, the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery recommended that anosmia be added to the list of COVID-19 symptoms used to screen people for possible testing or self-isolation.

In addition to COVID-19, loss of smell can also result from allergies as well as other viruses, including rhinoviruses that cause the common cold. So anosmia alone does not mean you have COVID-19. Studies are being done to get more definitive answers about how common anosmia is in people with COVID-19, at what point after infection loss of smell occurs, and how to distinguish loss of smell caused by COVID-19 from loss of smell caused by allergies, other viruses, or other causes altogether.

Until we know more, tell your doctor right away if you find yourself newly unable to smell. He or she may prompt you to get tested and to self-isolate.

- - -

ARE CHLOROQUINE AND HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE EFFECTIVE FOR TREATING COVID-19?

Recently, there has been considerable discussion of whether two related drugs — I and Hydroxychloroquine — that have been available for decades to treat other illnesses might also be effective in treating COVID-19.

The drugs are primarily used to treat malaria and several inflammatory diseases, including systemic Lupus Erythematous (lupus) and rheumatoid arthritis. No drug is perfectly safe, but these drugs are quite safe when used for just the several days they might be needed to treat COVID-19. They are also cheap, already available at our local drug stores, and relatively free of side effects.

The question, of course, is whether they are effective against the coronavirus that causes COVID-19. Are they effective in killing the virus in a laboratory dish? And are they effective in killing the virus in people? If the answer to the first question is "no," there's no point in getting an answer to the second question.

There is strong evidence that both drugs kill the COVID-19 virus in the laboratory dish. The drugs appear to work through two mechanisms. First, they make it harder for the virus to attach itself to the cell, inhibiting the virus from entering the cell and multiplying within it. Second, if the virus does manage to get inside the cell, the drugs kill it before it can multiply.

But do the drugs work in people with COVID-19? Many studies are underway to get an answer to this question, but as of March 24, 2020, only two have issued preliminary results.

One report, published in February 2020, claimed that Chloroquine had been used in more than 100 patients in China who had COVID-19. The scientists stated that their results demonstrated that Chloroquine is superior to the control treatment in inhibiting the worsening of pneumonia, improving lung imaging findings, eliminating the virus from the body, and shortening the duration of the disease.

These claims are exciting. However, the report provided virtually no evidence in support of the claims. First of all, this was not a randomised, double-blind controlled trial, the gold standard for research studies. Second, no evidence was presented as to how severe the pneumonia was, nor whether findings on lung x-rays or CT scans really improved. Third, although they claim the drug made the virus disappear, they didn't report what the levels of the virus were before versus after the treatment. In short, not much evidence.

Another small study was conducted by a group of scientists in southern France, a region hard hit by COVID-19. This, also, was not a randomised trial. Instead, the scientists compared 26 patients who received Hydroxychloroquine to 16 who did not: after six days, the virus was gone from the body in 70% of those given the treatment, compared to only 12.5% of those who weren't. The drug appeared to be as effective in the sickest patients as in the least sick, but the study was too small to be sure about that. The study also was too small to say that people who received the treatment were protected against a prolonged illness or death.

There are many studies underway, and we should have more solid answers within a few months.

- - -

I HEARD THAT CERTAIN BLOOD PRESSURE MEDICINES MIGHT WORSEN THE SYMPTOMS OF COVID-19.

SHOULD I STOP TAKING MY MEDICATION NOW JUST IN CASE I DO GET INFECTED?

SHOULD I STOP IF I DEVELOP SYMPTOMS OF COVID-19?

You are referring to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), two types of medications used primarily to treat high blood pressure (hypertension) and heart disease. Doctors also prescribe these medicines for people who have protein in their urine, a common problem in people with diabetes.
At this time, the American Heart Association (AHA), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), and the Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA) strongly recommend that people taking these medications should continue to do so, even if they become infected.
Here's how this concern got started. Researchers doing animal studies on a different coronavirus (the SARS coronavirus from the early 2000s) found that certain sites on lung cells called ACE-2 receptors appeared to help the SARS virus enter the lungs and cause pneumonia. ACE inhibitor and ARB drugs raised ACE-2 receptor levels in the animals.

Could this mean people taking these drugs are more susceptible to COVID-19 infection and are more likely to get pneumonia?

The reality today:
Human studies have not confirmed the findings in animal studies.

Some studies suggest that ACE inhibitors and ARBs may reduce lung injury in people with other viral pneumonia. The same might be true of pneumonia caused by the COVID-19 virus.

Stopping your ACE inhibitor or ARB could actually put you at greater risk of complications from the infection since it's likely that your blood pressure will rise and heart problems would get worse.

The bottom line: The AHA, ACC, and HFSA strongly recommend continuing to take ACE inhibitor or ARB medications, even if you get sick with COVID-19.

- - -

SHOULD I GO TO THE DOCTOR OR DENTIST FOR NON-URGENT APPOINTMENTS?

During this period of social distancing, it is best to postpone non-urgent appointments with your doctor or dentist. These may include regular good visits or dental cleanings, as well as follow-up appointments to manage chronic conditions if your health has been relatively stable in the recent past. You should also postpone routine screening tests, such as a mammogram or PSA blood test if you are at average risk of disease. Many doctor's surgeries have started restricting surgery visits to urgent matters only, so you may not have a choice in the matter.

As an alternative, doctor's offices are increasingly the so-called telehealth services. This may mean appointments by phone call, or virtual visits using a video chat service. Ask to schedule a telehealth appointment with your doctor for a new or ongoing non-urgent matter. If, after speaking to you, your doctor would like to see you in person, he or she will let you know.

What if your appointments are not urgent but also don't fall into the low-risk category? For example, if you have been advised to have periodic scans after cancer remission, if your doctor sees you regularly to monitor for a condition for which you're at increased risk, or if your treatment varies based on your most recent test results? In these and similar cases, call your doctor for advice.

- - -

IS IT SAFE TO TAKE IBUPROFEN TO TREAT SYMPTOMS OF COVID-19?

Some French doctors advise against using ibuprofen (Motrin, Advil, many generic versions) for COVID-19 symptoms based on reports of otherwise healthy people with confirmed COVID-19 who were taking an NSAID for symptom relief and developed severe illness, especially pneumonia. These are only observations and not based on scientific studies.

The WHO initially recommended using paracetamol instead of ibuprofen to help reduce fever and aches and pains related to this coronavirus infection, but now states that either paracetamol or ibuprofen can be used. Rapid changes in recommendations create uncertainty. Since some doctors remain concerned about NSAIDs, it still seems prudent to choose paracetamol first, with a total dose not exceeding 3,000 milligrams per day.

However, if you suspect or know you have COVID-19 and cannot take paracetamol, or have taken the maximum dose and still need symptom relief, taking over-the-counter ibuprofen does not need to be specifically avoided.

- - -

HOW RELIABLE IS THE TEST FOR COVID-19?

Tests are becoming more widely available and are being processed in commercial labs and academic centres across the country. In the US, the most common test for the COVID-19 virus looks for viral RNA in a sample taken with a swab from a person's nose or throat. Currently, you can expect the test results within three to four days. Likely the turnaround time for results will be shorter over the next few weeks.
If a test result comes back positive, it is almost certain that the person is infected.

A negative test result is less definite. An infected person could get a so-called "false negative" test result if the swab missed the virus, for example, or because of an inadequacy of the test itself. We also don't yet know at what point during the course of illness a test becomes positive.

If you experience COVID-like symptoms and get a negative test result, there is no reason to repeat the test unless your symptoms get worse. If your symptoms do worsen, call your doctor or local or state healthcare department for guidance on further testing. You should also self-isolate at home. Wear a mask if you have one when interacting with members of your household. And practice social distancing.

The rapid spread of the coronavirus has sparked worldwide alarm. The World Health Organisation (WHO) has declared this rapidly spreading outbreak a pandemic. Many countries are struggling with a rise in confirmed cases. All over the world people are advised to be prepared for disruptions to daily li...

Address

Spire Parkway Hospital 1 Damson Parkway
Solihull
B912PP

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Trevor Lawrence posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Trevor Lawrence:

Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest Share on Reddit Share via Email
Share on WhatsApp Share on Instagram Share on Telegram

Category