06/04/2026
Why are most people not suitable for under eye (tear trough) dermal filler?
I’ve been an aesthetic medicine doctor for 18 years and I’m definitely doing less tear trough filler work than I used to. We have lots more treatment options than in past years which is great.
The area around the eyes is really delicate; the skin is thinning, it’s picking up sun damage and there are a lot of lymph vessels in the area so we’ve got to be extremely cautious.
If somebody has got puffiness or swelling or eye bags or thin crepy skin, they’re not going to be suitable for dermal filler as it will draw in moisture and could make the situation worse.
Sometimes I see people who have under eye dark circles and the issue is skin quality and pigment rather than volume loss so they’re not going to be a good candidate for filler.
I want to do a full facial assessment and not just focus on the tear troughs because overtime people are losing volume in their mid face and the fat pads are repositioning and sliding down, so yes dermal fillers are part of a toolbox that we have, and I’ll do it in a small number of people who’ve got true volume loss or hollowing in that area, but only after we’ve looked at the whole face and made a plan.
I’m 60 and I’ve got some lax skin around my eyes and I would be prone to puffiness if I had dermal filler here ( I have some elsewhere in my face) so we’re always looking at skin care, we’re trying to improve skin quality and strength. We look at things like SkinPen micro needling, and devices, and there are injectables other than dermal fillers that can give a good improvement in this area like some of the biostimulators or the polynucleotides, or Sunekos, so we won’t always go straight for filler, but it’s a useful option in a small select number of people. Take care, Eithne
filler