11/03/2026
Control as a Nervous System State 🧠
The experience of feeling out of control and the pattern of being a controlling person both relate to the nervous system’s attempt to maintain safety, but they arise from very different internal dynamics. When someone feels out of control, the core issue is a loss of agency. Events are happening externally and cannot be influenced, such as a car crash, dealing with insurance processes, or being signed off work by a doctor but knowing there is a fixed date when one must return. In these situations the nervous system perceives uncertainty, pressure, and a lack of predictability. Psychologically, the underlying belief may be something like “I cannot influence what happens next” or “important things affecting me are outside my control.” This tends to activate a stress response in the body. The sympathetic nervous system may produce anxiety, agitation, racing thoughts, or an urgent desire to fix or manage the situation. If the stress becomes overwhelming, the body may move towards a freeze or shutdown state, resulting in exhaustion, brain fog, or feelings of helplessness. Behaviourally, this state often leads to worrying, rumination, seeking reassurance, or feeling under pressure from external demands.
By contrast, a person who is described as controlling is not experiencing a lack of control in the moment but is using control as a psychological strategy to regulate their internal state. In this case the behaviour usually comes from an underlying belief that safety depends on maintaining power over situations or people. The unconscious assumptions might be “If I am not in control something will go wrong”, “Other people cannot be trusted to do things properly”, or “I must maintain authority in order to avoid vulnerability or failure.” These beliefs often develop in environments where there was chaos, criticism, unpredictability, or emotional insecurity. The nervous system in this situation is also responding to perceived threat, but instead of feeling helpless it attempts to regulate through dominance and rigidity. Physiologically this often involves chronic sympathetic activation, with heightened vigilance, intolerance of uncertainty, and strong emotional reactions when things do not go according to plan. Behaviourally, this may manifest as micromanaging, rigid rules, criticism, or attempts to dominate or manipulate others in order to keep the environment predictable.
From a psychosomatic perspective, both patterns are rooted in the nervous system’s fundamental need for safety and predictability, but the strategies differ. Feeling out of control involves a perception that events are happening to the person and cannot be influenced, which leads to anxiety, pressure, or shutdown. Controlling behaviour, on the other hand, is an attempt to prevent vulnerability by forcing the environment to conform to one’s expectations. In other words, one pattern arises from perceived powerlessness, while the other attempts to defend against that same feeling by asserting power over people or circumstances. Both responses can therefore be understood as nervous system strategies for managing threat rather than simply personality traits or moral failings.
www.fireflysomatics.com
