06/12/2025
Hoe anders zou onze wereld er nu uitzien als we niet van die malle omwegen qua gelijkwaardigheid van vrouwen hadden genomen... Just a thought.
In 1871, Charles Darwin published a theory that claimed women were intellectually inferior to men, and he wrapped that claim in the language of science. Four years later, a woman he underestimated dismantled his argument with such force that he never answered her again.
Antoinette Brown Blackwell had already broken one barrier before she ever set her sights on Darwin. In 1853, at twenty-eight, she became the first woman ordained as a minister in the United States. She stood in a small Congregational church in South Butler, New York, and stepped directly into a role ministers and theologians had long insisted belonged only to men. For centuries, the pulpit had been closed to women. Antoinette walked straight into it.
But preaching alone could not contain her mind. She drifted from theology into philosophy, and from philosophy into science, drawn toward the new ideas that were reshaping how people understood life. When Darwin published On the Origin of Species in 1859, Antoinette was captivated. She read his work closely, line by line, and by 1869 produced a book of her own, Studies in General Science, where she engaged with evolutionary theory with a seriousness most universities still refused to offer to women. She mailed Darwin a copy, unsure if he would ever see it. He replied with a courteous letter, noting that she had quoted obscure sections of his work that few readers even noticed. It was small, polite recognition, but for a woman working outside the academy, it mattered.
Then in 1871, The Descent of Man appeared. And Antoinette discovered something troubling. Darwin, the man she had admired for his commitment to evidence, had built his discussion of s*x differences on old prejudices rather than on scientific reasoning. He argued that men had evolved to be more intelligent and inventive, the natural thinkers and problem-solvers of the species. Women, he wrote, were emotional creatures, fitted for nurturing but not for abstract thought. Their brains, he claimed, were closer to those of children. His words carried the weight of scientific authority, and they were repeated by doctors, teachers, and lawmakers who used them to justify excluding women from universities, scientific societies, and the vote itself.
Antoinette refused to let that stand.
For four years she studied every argument, every assumption, every gap in Darwin’s reasoning. In 1875 she published The Sexes Throughout Nature, a patient and exacting rebuttal that did not rely on outrage but on evidence. Darwin had used species where males were larger or brightly feathered as proof that males were naturally superior. Antoinette pointed out that he had ignored countless species where females were stronger, larger, or more dominant. She wrote about female spiders that dwarfed their mates, about birds of prey where the females hunted with more force, about insects where the female alone carried the strength of the species.
She argued that Darwin had made a simple but devastating mistake: he had confused culture with biology. Women appeared less accomplished not because nature designed it so, but because they were denied education, shut out of science, told from birth that ambition was unseemly. What looked like natural law was nothing more than social restriction.
She wrote that male scientists were studying women the way wealthy men studied poverty—without ever acknowledging the system that created the inequality they claimed to observe.
Darwin never responded to her book. He could not rebut her arguments, so he left them unanswered. Other male scientists followed his example. They debated each other with enthusiasm, yet they brushed her aside with silence. But her work traveled elsewhere. Suffragists quoted her. Women scientists drew strength from her reasoning. She had shown that scientific authority could be challenged, and that a woman without formal training could out-reason the leading thinkers of her time.
Antoinette kept working. She wrote on philosophy and science. She lectured for the suffrage movement. She raised five children and still carved out time to study and write. She lived her argument every day: women could think, could reason, could lead.
She lived long enough to see the world change. Born in 1825, she attended the first Women’s Rights Convention in Seneca Falls in 1850. She fought for women’s voting rights for seventy years. And in 1920, at ninety-five, she cast a ballot in a U.S. election—the only woman from that first convention still alive to witness the victory they had dreamed of.
She died in 1921 at ninety-six, carrying a lifetime of work behind her.
Antoinette Brown Blackwell’s challenge to Darwin remains one of the clearest examples of how bias can infect even the most celebrated science, and how a determined mind can expose that bias with careful, steady reasoning. Darwin claimed that women were limited by biology. Antoinette showed that they were limited by the world men had built around them.
She overturned his argument not with anger, but with intellect, discipline, and a refusal to let prejudice disguise itself as truth. And she spent nearly a century proving—by her scholarship, her leadership, and her life—that a woman’s mind could meet any challenge placed before it.
