15/11/2014
OUTCOME OF MPATT SPECIAL MEETING AT SAN FERNANDO GENERAL HOSPITAL ON 11/11/14
MPATT held an emergency special meeting at the San Fernando General Hospital on 11th November 2014. The meeting was convened to discuss a counter proposal offer from the SWRHA, in respect of ongoing salary negotiations between the SWRHA and MPATT for the period 2009-201. This counter proposal offer was in effect, correspondence from the Office of the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Health to the Chairman of the SWRHA, advising that approval was given for a package of benefits to be used as the basis of negotiations between the SWRHA and MPATT.
MPATT reiterates to its membership that this counter proposal is not a final document but is to be used as a basis for negotiations between SWRHA and MPATT. As MPATT’s position should reflect the views of its membership this special meeting was held to solicit same. MPATT has noted many recent calls by members of the medical fraternity for updates and discussions on salary negotiations however MPATT only received a counter proposal during the middle of this year. That proposal was grossly inadequate and was immediately dispatched by MPATT as not fit for discussion with the membership. MPATT asked for a serious counter-proposal to be made, which was dated 4th November 2014 and received on the 10th November, 2014.
A summary of the discussions with the membership at this special meeting on 11/11/14 is as follows:
• The counter-proposal package from the SWRHA for the period January 1, 2009 to October 31, 2010 and November 1, 2010 to October, 2013 for medical professionals was unanimously REJECTED.
• The position that allowances should be consolidated into a flat salary was unanimously ACCEPTED
• The membership unanimously agreed that salary increases should be implemented from 1st January 2015 and that all backpay should be paid by 31st January 2015.
• The membership unanimously ACCEPTED that the motor-vehicle tax and Value-added Tax exemptions should be reinstated
• The membership ACCEPTED the bargaining position of MPATT that Continuing Medical Education (CME) allowance be consolidated to $30,000 per year, with the option to accumulate over a two-year period. The membership REJECTED the position that applications by doctors for CME allowance need to be justified.
• The membership unanimously ACCEPTED that the Communication allowance be reinstated and increased to $600.00
• MPATT Executive suggested an option of 4% increase per year from 2011-2013 and then 5% per year for 2014-2015 with 20% increase on allowances, which would be an approximate increase of 23%.
o The membership unanimously ACCEPTED that negotiations should extend and apply to the 2015 period.
o The membership REJECTED the proposed percentage increases for the relevant period. The membership was asked to suggest alternative bargaining positions. A number of suggested options were put forward by members present, which seemed arbitrarily determined, yet were similar to the numbers that MPATT has proposed in its initial Salary Proposals to SWRHA.
For clarity, MPATT’s initial proposal to SWRHA was presented to its membership in 2010 at the SFGH and was developed after conducting significant research of compensation to medical doctors from four (4) former commonwealth jurisdictions. Also, comparisons were drawn using the most recent Salaries Review Commission (SRC) recommendations, especially since several positions that were under the purview of the SRC were formerly at the same pay-grade as medical doctors in the old public-service classification. MPATT also had expert input from prominent persons in the field of Economics and Industrial Relations, who advised on the content of salary proposals for doctors.
MPATT also explained that historically, basic salary could not be increased beyond the level of the Permanent Secretaries as they were the most senior public servants. The founding members of MPATT had fought hard for allowances to be included, which would serve to augment the total package for doctors while leaving the basic salary below that of senior public servants.
Immediately after meeting with its membership, the Executive of MPATT met with the Joint Negotiating Team where the concerns of the membership were put forward to the JNT. MPATT was advised to put these concerns and suggestions in writing however the JNT could not give a definite timeframe for a revised counter proposal as there were quite a number of suggested changes. MPATT awaits an urgent response from JNT.
MPATT would like to urge members of the medical profession to become members of the union as this can only serve to strengthen the membership and by extension, the bargaining power of the union. MPATT acknowledges many important points were made by doctors at this most recent meeting however unfortunately many attendees were not MPATT members and we cannot represent non-members. MPATT has been working to represent the interests of individual doctors in many matters across all RHAs and those doctors who are members of MPATT and have been represented by the union in their respective industrial relations matters, can attest to the importance of having an MPATT representative there with the institutional memory and knowledge of good industrial relations practices.
MPATT takes note that some individual doctors have perused the most recent counter proposal and have their own suggestions which have found its way to the media. While these suggestions may coincide with the views of the membership of MPATT, understand that in the case of SWRHA, the employer is legally required to negotiate with MPATT through a process of bargaining to achieve a mutually beneficial outcome which MPATT has been engaged in for the last five years since receiving RMU status. The precedent that is set by MPATT will set the tone for all other RHAs where MPATT does not have RMU status. If you sign new arrangements prematurely, and MPATT successfully negotiates an improved contract, your existing contract will be binding. This is not a time for forming sub-groups and splinter-groups and seeking to destabilize your union; MPATT is only as strong as its membership and the battle for improved terms and conditions of employment must be fought in the bargaining room across the table from the employer, as it has been done in the past.
Please be guided accordingly.
MPATT Executive.
14/11/14