04/17/2026
He’s here, there, and everywhere. Thanks to a grant from the Pharmacy Compounding Foundation, APC’s Scott Brunner was in Columbus last week to present at the Ohio Pharmacists Association’s annual conference. His topic? How GLP-1s Have Changed Compounding. This weekend, thanks to another of those grants, he’ll be in chilly Minot, North Dakota to present on A Pharmacy Compounding Public Policy Update. (Note to Scott: Pack a coat.)
FDA wants more teeth on drug advertising. In its budget request to Congress, the FDA is asking for new authority to declare drugs "misbranded" based on misleading direct-to-consumer advertising — including compounded drugs. The agency wants to be able to act against ads that overstate efficacy, imply broader FDA approval than exists, or fail to clearly disclose that a compounded product has not been reviewed for safety, effectiveness, or quality. The ask isn't surprising given the agency's recent marketing crackdown on telehealth platforms, but turning that enforcement posture into statutory authority would be a meaningful escalation.
Could compounders fill the insulin detemir void? A new citizen petition asks the FDA to declare insulin detemir — the drug formerly marketed by Novo Nordisk as Levemir before it was discontinued — a medically necessary drug in shortage and to permit outsourcing facilities to compound it. There's a legal wrinkle worth noting: compounding pharmacies are generally not permitted to compound biologics under federal law. But the FDA has exercised enforcement discretion on that front before, which makes this one worth keeping an eye on.
A skeptical take on the peptide push. This week, ProPublica published a deep dive into the FDA’s potential reversal on peptides. The piece centers on a core tension: RFK Jr. has called the 2023 decision to categorize 19 peptides as unsafe “illegal,” arguing the agency has no safety signal to justify the move. Three former FDA officials pushed back on the characterization, saying the decision was well-documented and supported by real safety concerns. While the article acknowledges a regulated compounding pathway would be meaningfully safer than the current gray market, it doesn’t fully embrace the argument either. It’s a useful snapshot of where the debate stands and a reminder that however this plays out, proponents will need to make a credible case on safety, not just access.
Read more at https://bit.ly/4vCgKjO