03/16/2026
QUESTION: When looking at outcomes, can you trust self-report data from people under an Involuntary Outpatient Commitment (IOC) order *OR* the providers responsible for implementing and overseeing those orders?
SHORT ANSWER: No.
LONGER ANSWER: Both people under IOC orders (more commonly referred to as "Assisted Outpatient Treatment" or "AOT" orders in the US) and the providers responsible for implementing the orders have incentive to misrepresent the truth.
People under IOC orders have absolutely nothing to gain from telling the people who have so much power over them that the order isn't effective. In fact, they could be subjected to even more force as a result.
And the providers risk being blamed or held responsible if they acknowledge things aren't working.
Data on IOC implementation and efficacy is limited overall and what data there is pretty clearly tells us that IOC orders do NOT work and can cause great harm.
This video is one of the first in a series of "Assisted Outpatient Treatment" Shorts taken from presentations by researcher and subject matter expert, Nev Jones.
Find more on at youtube.com/-Up