Loel Fenwick MD

Loel Fenwick MD Dr. Fenwick saved the US $4 billion a year by developing the single room maternity care system. Health and Savings Cooperatives

Now he has a healthcare plan to save our country $1 trillion annually.

12/18/2016

Dr. Fenwick saved the US $4 billion a year by developing the single room maternity care system. Now he has a healthcare plan to save our country $1 trillion annually. See NOTES for details.

The International Symposium on FCMC
12/04/2016

The International Symposium on FCMC

Ironic that the French entrepreneurial leaders are coming here just as America now follows France into income redistribu...
03/10/2014

Ironic that the French entrepreneurial leaders are coming here just as America now follows France into income redistribution!
http://www.cbn.com/tv/3255110732001

France's Reckoning: Rich, Young Flee Welfare State

Bill Whittle introduces the Fenwick Sugden Healthcare Plan as the practical alternative to Obamacare.  Please share if y...
11/24/2013

Bill Whittle introduces the Fenwick Sugden Healthcare Plan as the practical alternative to Obamacare. Please share if you agree.

http://youtu.be/a-TccVX5BBo

In this installment of the YOUR GOVERNMENT series, Virtual President Bill Whittle explains why a two-cent aspirin pill costs $20, and how we can replace the ...

An evening with Bill Whittle packed the house in Couerd'Alene. We are joined here by our hosts and friends Brent Regan, ...
05/17/2013

An evening with Bill Whittle packed the house in Couerd'Alene. We are joined here by our hosts and friends Brent Regan, Bill Whittle, Tonya and Burt Rutan.

Follow Bill at www.mrvirtualpresident.com

03/01/2013

Saturday, March 2nd at 12:30 pm I will be speaking at the Couer d'Alene, ID Public Library. I'll be speaking about the insurance exchange.

03/01/2013

I will be speaking this evening, March 1st at the Sandpoint, ID Community Hall at 6:30 pm.

02/18/2013

Patient Power — Healthcare for the Information Age

Imagine being able to buy medical services the way you book a vacation, where you can search the web for the best destinations, check out features, benefits, ratings and prices, choose the perfect experience, then pay with a mouse-click. You can also choose a travel agent to help you decide where to go, what to do, and how to get the best deal. Either way, it’s your money, so you get to choose what you want and save by shopping for best value.

America’s healthcare system, which is by far the most expensive in the world, has few choices and no bargains. It was built for the industrial age, when workers looked to unions and to their employers for direction. Government responded with new “progressive” programs like federal income tax, social security, Medicare, Medicaid and employer-paid health benefits, and new bureaucracies began to rule America as controllers and enforcers.

The nature of government is to grow in size and power. From the beginning, government’s goal for healthcare was a European-style “single payer” system that gives total control of every person’s medical care to the government. While the cost of healthcare controlled by the government/insurance industry cartel has grown seven times faster than the American population, it has failed America’s poor and needy—and everyone else.

The cost of healthcare is the greatest contributor to our national debt, and the greatest threat to the economy of our states and our nation. After taking low salaries to get health benefits, the average American family finds it impossible to save. Parents work more jobs and more hours just to survive. For millions, the American dream is out of reach. Hundreds of thousands of American families who have health insurance have been bankrupted by premiums, taxes, co-pays and by excluded conditions and care.

By wasting more than a trillion dollars each year on overhead, unnecessary procedures, fraud and abuse, the government/insurance cartel has caused hundreds of thousands of companies to reduce benefits or go out of business. Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security are coming due to fail.

Instead of facing the fact that their top-down, centrally-controlled system has failed, our government still dreams of a single-payer, universal healthcare utopia. Now, after passing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (aka ObamaCare), our federal government needs only the acquiescence of the states to become the only option, and to increase US healthcare spending by another $1.4 trillion each year to $4.6 trillion each year by 2020.
1
Fortunately, Idaho and other states can still put a stop to the greatest tax increase and transfer of power in US history. We must act quickly to keep Idaho’s right to control our own healthcare, and replace the failed system with an alternative that could possibly save each Idaho family hundreds of thousands of dollars for future health needs and retirement.

The Patient Power plan eliminates government/insurance industry control and overhead for most consumers. It will reduce unnecessary healthcare consumption and costs and return insurance to its proper role of protecting against catastrophic events. Monitored personal savings accounts will give Medicare and Medicaid recipients an opportunity to accrue personal savings through healthy behavior and prudent healthcare choices. State government and private industry will save billions of dollars as patients become consumers, each protecting his or her savings against waste, fraud and abuse. And, healthcare providers will finally compete for customers on an open and level playing field, the heart of getting prices in line with the services provided.

To understand how Patient Power works, let’s look how we lost control of our healthcare. Money is power. In the 1960s, Government’s first step was to separate healthcare consumers from their buying power through taxes, insurance premiums and regulations, and to choke off patients’ ability to choose best value in a free market. Prices and quality of medical procedures and services are hidden. Prescriptions, authorizations, gate-keepers, price-fixing and mandated services make comparison shopping impossible. Choices and access are limited or absent. The insurance system invites over-consumption, and outright fraud. If it’s “covered by insurance” there is no reason for doctors or patients to forego any treatment. The Rand Institute shows that 30+% of care is unnecessary because it’s “free.”

Bureaucratic rules and regulations to control costs created a healthcare monster that almost doubles the cost of care. According to the US Census Bureau, only 58 cents of every healthcare dollar pays for medical goods and services. The other 42 cents pays for government and insurance industry administration. Half a million federal, state and insurance bureaucrats control every detail of every person’s medical care and another half a million commercial, private provider and hospital administrative and medical billing staff create records, seek approvals and negotiate payment.

Today, the central-control system wastes or over-consumes half of our $3 trillion national annual healthcare expenditure. This is enough to provide affordable healthcare to every needy person, and still reduce our national debt by more than a trillion dollars each year.

Despite its failure, Government’s second step was to expand and entrench the central control system with 2,700 pages of new regulations and 170+ new government agencies. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act creates an absolute monopoly that will permanently shelter the government cartel from innovation and competition. The federal government plans to force citizens to pre-pay Health Insurance Exchanges for medical care that they may not need or want, at a price that will jump from two times the actual cost to three or four times the average cost of care. Deceptively called a “premium,” this is a TAX to pay for the 5% of patients who consume 50% of healthcare. It will be paid to tens of millions of folks who earn up to four times the poverty level, and for millions more who suffer from obesity, diabetes, heart disease and lung disease because the current “All you can eat buffet” system provides no incentive to choose a healthy lifestyle.

The extra cost is not the worst of it. The Act will subject all Americans to absolute control of their health choices by federal and state bureaucrats, and release of information, both personal and financial, to agencies such as the IRS. This includes employment records, healthcare spending, medical records, bank accounts and assets.

The Patient Power Plan is a voluntary alternative to commercial insurance that uses a system of personal healthcare Internet portals in patients’ homes, in doctors’ offices and in the facilities of other providers of medical goods and services. It was developed by Dr. Loel Fenwick and Dr. Richard Sugden, and is protected by a patent application.

Personal healthcare portals give consumers control of their healthcare choices and provide medical information, comparable effectiveness of various medical options, control over their medical records, control of savings and payments, health status monitoring and access to “health navigators” who help patients make cost-effective health choices.
In 2012 employers paid $12,144 for a family of four, and the family paid $5,114 (plus $3,470 in out-of-pocket expenses) for insured healthcare. This is more than $20,720 a year, and more than $800,000 over a 40 year working career. In the Patient Power plan, employers and employees instead pay post-tax contributions of only $12,500 a year, which is approximately $500,000 over 40 years, into consumer-owned Insured Contingency Escrow (ICE) accounts that are dedicated to paying for specified expenses including health care.

ICE account holders will shop and pay for a lifetime average of less than $200,000 for medical care, and buy true catastrophic insurance to help pay for

expenses beyond their ICE balance. At current insurance costs, family savings will total nearly $170,000.

The Patient Power plan will start with pilot programs in states where legislators can provide a level playing field, where citizens are free and able to choose the care they want, and where providers, insurers and businesses are free to compete with the access, quality, service and pricing that consumers value. With changes in federal and state law, the plan could be also offered to recipients of Medicare, Medicaid and other government programs.

The federal government’s third and final step to complete its monopoly over American healthcare is implementation of state health insurance exchanges. These will require states to enforce control over the health, choice and economic freedom of every citizen in their state—in other words, do the dirty work for the federal government.

The beneficiaries of the trillion-dollar overhead, which are the federal government, the insurance industry and the hospital industry, have spent more than a billion dollars lobbying to protect their revenue and control. Lobbying for an Idaho health insurance exchange has been intense, and with practically no discussion of alternative plans.

Governor Otter now wants to establish a state insurance exchange. This would make the State of Idaho the enabling tool and enforcer of a federal monopoly against its own citizens. Only a state exchange gives the federal government power to use the State of Idaho to force Idaho citizens to purchase expensive “insurance” that is actually a tax, for medical care that they do not need or want, and cannot afford—or to turn them over to the IRS! A state insurance exchange would shut the door to any alternative, including a consumer controlled, free- market plan that could each year save the Idaho government more than $300 million, save Idaho employers more than $200 million, save Idaho citizens more than one billion dollars, and provide affordable healthcare to every Idaho citizen.

States are under no obligation to comply with the federal demand that they establish a state exchange. Neither is the state obligated to allow the federal government to require Idaho citizens to comply with federal exchanges. Idaho should just say “No!” and instead take the lead by implementing a Patient Power pilot program to demonstrate how a common-sense information-age healthcare can provide affordable healthcare for all Americans.

There is still time for our legislature to reject both a state and a federal exchange. The recent U.S. Supreme Court NFIB vs. Sebelius ruling confirms, “The States are separate and independent sovereigns, and they have to act like it.” 26 states have refused state insurance exchanges or have invoked their constitutional right not to submit to federal blandishments such as the Affordable Care Act. Now we need our legislators and governor to look beyond short-term interests and to defend Idaho’s future in the most important and closely watched decision ever to be made by the Idaho legislature.

Dr. Loel Fenwick is a healthcare innovator in Priest Lake, Idaho, who invented the birthing bed and the
birthing room system. His healthcare companies implemented the maternity system now standard in America and other countries. Dr. Richard Sugden is a family physician in Jackson, and healthcare leader in Wyoming. He founded numerous successful ventures including Teton Data Systems, which allows doctors to search all major medical textbooks online.

02/18/2013

Obamacare is still Vulnerable

Michael F. Cannon the director of health policy studies at the Cato Institute and co- editor of Replacing ObamaCare (Cato, 2012).

President Obama has won reelection, and his administration has asked state officials to decide by Friday, November 16, whether their state will create one of Obamacare’s health-insurance “exchanges.” States also have to decide whether to implement the law’s massive expansion of Medicaid. The correct answer to both questions remains a resounding no.

State-created exchanges mean higher taxes, fewer jobs, and less protection of religious freedom. States are better off defaulting to a federal exchange. The Medicaid expansion is likewise too costly and risky a proposition. Republican Governors Association chairman Bob McDonnell (R.,Va.) agrees, and has announced that Virginia will implement neither provision.

There are many arguments against creating exchanges.

First, states are under no obligation to create one.

Second, operating an Obamacare exchange would be illegal in 14 states. Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Montana, Ohio, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Utah, and Virginia have enacted either statutes or constitutional amendments (or both) forbidding state employees to participate in an essential exchange function: implementing Obamacare’s individual and employer mandates.

Third, each exchange would cost its state an estimated $10 million to $100 million per year, necessitating tax increases.

Fourth, the November 16 deadline is no more real than the “deadlines” for implementing REAL ID, which have been pushed back repeatedly since 2008.

Fifth, states can always create an exchange later if they choose.

Sixth, a state-created exchange is not a state-controlled exchange. All exchanges will be
controlled by Washington.

Seventh, Congress authorized no funds for federal “fallback” exchanges. So Washington may not be able to impose exchanges on states at all.

Eighth, the Obama administration has yet to provide crucial information that states need before they can make an informed decision.

Ninth, creating an exchange sets state officials up to take the blame when Obamacare increases insurance premiums and denies care to the sick. State officials won’t want their names on this disastrous mess.

Tenth, creating an exchange would be assisting in the creation of a “public option” that would drive domestic health-insurance carriers out of business through unfair competition.

Eleventh, Obamacare remains unpopular. The latest Kaiser Family Foundation poll found that only 38 percent of the public supports it.

Twelfth, defaulting to a federal exchange exempts a state’s employers from the employer mandate — a tax of $2,000 per worker per year (the tax applies to companies with more than 50 employees, but for such companies that tax applies after the 30th employee, not the 50th). If all states did so, that would also exempt 18 million Americans from the individual mandate’s tax of $2,085 per family of four. Avoiding those taxes improves a state’s prospects for job creation, and protects the conscience rights of employers and individuals whom the Obama administration is forcing to purchase contraceptives coverage.

Finally, rejecting an exchange reduces the federal deficit. Obamacare offers its deficit- financed subsidies to private health insurers only through state-created exchanges. If all states declined, federal deficits would fall by roughly $700 billion over ten years.

For similar reasons, states should decline to implement Obamacare’s Medicaid expansion. The Supreme Court gave states that option. All states should exercise it.
Medicaid is rife with waste and fraud. It increases the cost of private health care and insurance, crowds out private health insurance and long-term-care insurance, and discourages enrollees from climbing the economic ladder. There is scant reliable evidence that Medicaid improves health outcomes, and no evidence that it is a cost-effective way of doing so.

My colleague Jagadeesh Gokhale estimates that expanding Medicaid will cost individual states up to $53 billion over the first ten years. That’s before an emboldened President Obama follows through on his threats to shift more Medicaid costs to states.
Neither the states nor the federal government have the money to expand Medicaid. If all states politely decline, federal deficits will shrink by another $900 billion.

Now is not the time to go wobbly. Obamacare is still harmful and still unpopular. The presidential election was hardly a referendum, as it pitted the first person to enact Obamacare against the second person to enact it. Since the election, many state officials are reaffirming their opposition to both implementing exchanges and expanding Medicaid.

If enough states do so, Congress will have no choice but to reopen Obamacare. With a GOP-controlled House, opponents will be in a much stronger position than they were when this harmful law was enacted.

EDITOR’S NOTE: This article has been amended since its initial publication.

http://youtu.be/zaNKjqBffBc
02/18/2013

http://youtu.be/zaNKjqBffBc

An exciting, free market solution vs. big government will drive healthcare costs down. Dr. Fenwick of Priest Lake, Idaho, explains.

Address

100 Waterbird Landing
Coolin, ID
83821

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Loel Fenwick MD posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Loel Fenwick MD:

Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest Share on Reddit Share via Email
Share on WhatsApp Share on Instagram Share on Telegram