01/13/2026
We’re told that more intervention equals more safety.
1/3 of mothers have an induction.
1/3 of mothers have a cesarean.
2/3 of mothers have epidurals.
And yet…
Maternal morbidity is rising.
Postpartum hemorrhage is increasing.
Birth trauma is rampant.
NICU admissions are common.
And parents are reporting feeling harmed, dismissed, and violated.
You cannot hold both of these as true.
If intervention were truly the safest path, the outcomes would reflect that.
That’s the definition of cognitive dissonance:
Clinging to a belief despite mounting evidence that contradicts it…
And then defending that belief by doubling down on control instead of questioning the premise.
Ask yourself this:
What if risk is being created by the very systems designed to prevent it?
We’ve replaced individualized care and traditional wisdom with policies and algorithms.
And then we act surprised when outcomes deteriorate.
Medicine likes to call this “unintended consequences.”
But when the same patterns repeat decade after decade, at some point it’s no longer unintended.
It’s unexamined.
Real safety is found with personalization, informed consent, and evidence-based practices.
When we insist intervention is the answer before a problem exists, we aren’t practicing evidence-based medicine.
We’re practicing fear-based medicine.
👉🏻 Drop the word “BIRTH” in the comments and I’ll send you the link to my free birth course✨
With love,
Victoria
Midwives: .blessings.midwifery &
OBGYN:
Midwifery Students: & .birth