01/08/2026
“One Buck Limit” I’ve seen several posts lately where someone asks what regulation change hunters would like to see and without fail multiple people will reply “one buck limit” as if this one regulation change would greatly improve the overall quality of a states deer herd. I am going to go against the grain here but hear me out. In states with a two buck limit, changing to a one buck limit would have such minimal impact that it probably wouldn’t be noticeable.
A much more impactful change would be implementing a reasonable limit on nonresident deer hunters. The demand for mature bucks is at an all time high and continues to grow. Without a limit on nonresident hunters, any improvement made to a states deer herd would immediately be offset by attracting more nonresident hunters. It is a double edged sword- make the herd better by shooting fewer bucks and without a nonresident limit you attract more hunters who in turn shoot more bucks.
Let’s look at Iowa whom many consider the state with the best whitetail herd because of the number of mature bucks living there. Iowa claims top spot not because of a limit on how many bucks can be shot (up to 3) but because of their approach to limiting nonresident hunters. If Iowa went to a one buck limit and at the same time changed their nonresident policy to match Illinois, their deer herd would be destroyed in two seasons at most.
Limiting nonresident deer hunters is a “must have” on any states list of regulation changes if they are serious about having a better deer herd.