03/14/2026
๐๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ฅ๐ฌ ๐๐ ๐๐ข๐ฏ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฌ๐๐ฅ๐ฏ๐๐ฌ ๐๐ฌ ๐๐ก๐ข๐ซ๐จ๐ฉ๐ซ๐๐๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐ฌ
For many years, when people asked me what kind of Chiropractor I was, I would say that I was a ๐ง๐จ๐ง-๐ญ๐ก๐๐ซ๐๐ฉ๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐ข๐ ๐๐ก๐ข๐ซ๐จ๐ฉ๐ซ๐๐๐ญ๐จ๐ซ. That description made sense to me because I was trying to separate what I do from the medical or therapy-based model that dominates healthcare.
Recently though, I saw a post by another Chiropractor who also identifies as non-therapeutic and he made a statement that caught my attention. He said that ๐ง๐จ๐ง-๐ญ๐ก๐๐ซ๐๐ฉ๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐ข๐ ๐๐ก๐ข๐ซ๐จ๐ฉ๐ซ๐๐๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐ฌ ๐๐จ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ก๐๐ฏ๐ ๐๐๐ซ๐ ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐๐ง๐ฌ. That made me stop and think, because when people ask me how often they should come in, my answer has always been pretty simple. I usually say, โ๐๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฒ ๐โ๐๐ ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐จ๐ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐ฅ ๐จ๐ง๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐๐ฌโฆ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ ๐ ๐๐ข๐ ๐๐ข๐ซ๐ฌ๐ญ, ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎโ๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ง๐๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ง๐จ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ซ ๐๐ก๐ข๐ซ๐จ๐ฉ๐ซ๐๐๐ญ๐จ๐ซ.โ It usually gets a laugh, but the point behind it is serious. I absolutely suggest ๐ฅ๐ข๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐ฆ๐ ๐๐ก๐ข๐ซ๐จ๐ฉ๐ซ๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐ ๐๐๐ซ๐.
Apparently though, according to that non-therapeutic Chiropractorโs definition, that means I donโt qualify as a non-therapeutic Chiropractor after all because ๐๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฒ ๐โ๐๐ ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐จ๐ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐ฅ ๐จ๐ง๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐๐ฌ is, in fact, a care plan . That realization made me step back and think about something interesting. Maybe the labels we give ourselves in this profession are not nearly as clear as we think they are.
If we look across the profession, there are several commonly used categories that Chiropractors tend to place themselves into.
One of the most widely recognized is the ๐๐ข๐ฑ๐๐ซ ๐จ๐ซ ๐๐ก๐๐ซ๐๐ฉ๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐ข๐ ๐๐ก๐ข๐ซ๐จ๐ฉ๐ซ๐๐๐ญ๐จ๐ซ. These are Chiropractors who incorporate multiple therapies into their practice, things like physiotherapy modalities, rehabilitation exercises, soft tissue work, nutrition counseling, laser therapy, decompression, colonics, shock wave therapy and a variety of other treatment tools. In this model, the adjustment is often one tool among many. Care is typically structured around ๐ฌ๐ฒ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ญ๐จ๐ฆ๐ฌ, ๐ฉ๐๐ข๐ง, ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฆ๐๐๐ข๐๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐ข๐๐ ๐ง๐จ๐ฌ๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ, and treatment plans are designed with the goal of resolving or managing those conditions.
Another category is what many people refer to as the ๐๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ข๐ ๐ก๐ญ ๐๐ก๐ข๐ซ๐จ๐ฉ๐ซ๐๐๐ญ๐จ๐ซ. Traditionally, Straight Chiropractors focus primarily on the adjustment and avoid adding outside therapies into their offices. However, many Straight Chiropractors still discuss symptoms and often structure care around improving specific conditions. Some reference spinal levels and their relationship to different parts of the body, sometimes using charts like the Merrick chart to explain how spinal misalignments may influence certain organs or functions.
A more specific philosophical position is known as ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐ ๐๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ข๐ ๐ก๐ญ ๐๐ก๐ข๐ซ๐จ๐ฉ๐ซ๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐. In this model the Chiropractor attempts to remove symptom-based reasoning entirely and focuses only on the ๐๐๐ญ๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ซ๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐ ๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ญ๐๐๐ซ๐๐ฅ ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง. The objective is not to treat diseases or conditions but simply to locate and correct subluxations so the bodyโs innate intelligence can function without interference. In that model the outcome, whatever it may be, is considered the bodyโs responsibility, not the Chiropractorโs. These Chiropractors typically recommend ongoing care plans, not to โtreatโ anything but to regularly check the spine for subluxations and correct them when found so that the body can function optimally.
Then there is the category I used to, but no longer, place myself in, the ๐๐จ๐ง-๐๐ก๐๐ซ๐๐ฉ๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐ข๐ ๐๐ก๐ข๐ซ๐จ๐ฉ๐ซ๐๐๐ญ๐จ๐ซ. The spirit behind this idea is very similar to Objective Straight Chiropractic in that the Chiropractor is not trying to treat disease. This category of Chiropractic advocates for and practices a philosophy, science, and art of specifically locating, analyzing, and correcting vertebral subluxations for the normal transmission of the innate impulses (mental impulses) of the body generated by the innate law of living things (innate intelligence). They teach that Chiropractic is nothing else. However, as I recently discovered, some individuals who identify with this label define it even more narrowly, including the idea that a Chiropractor should not recommend care plans.
And then there is another category that has been gaining more attention in recent years, often referred to as the ๐๐๐๐ข๐ฉ๐ซ๐๐๐ญ๐จ๐ซ. Chiropractors who embrace this model are very open about the fact that they want the profession to move closer to the medical model. Many of them openly reject the word ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง and dislike the word ๐๐๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ, preferring instead the term ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ข๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ข๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง. Their focus is almost entirely on ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐๐ฎ๐ฅ๐จ๐ฌ๐ค๐๐ฅ๐๐ญ๐๐ฅ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐จ๐ซ๐๐๐ซ๐ฌ, pain, symptoms, and medically diagnosed conditions. Some even question why Chiropractors should not be allowed to prescribe drugs or perform certain types of surgery. Their ultimate desire is to be accepted as part of mainstream medicine.
So depending on who you talk to, you may hear Chiropractors identify themselves as mixers, traditional straights, objective straights, non-therapeutic Chiropractors, or medipractors. Each of those labels comes with its own philosophical framework and its own interpretation of what chiropractic is supposed to be.
Which brings me back to the irony of my own situation. Years ago, I actually applied for membership in a non-therapeutic chiropractic association. My application was denied because my website at the time listed research on symptoms that chiropractic has been shown to help with. Even though the intent was simply educational, that alone was enough to disqualify me. Looking back now, I can honestly say something I didnโt expect to say at the time. ๐โ๐ฆ ๐๐๐ญ๐ฎ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ ๐ ๐ฐ๐๐ฌ๐งโ๐ญ ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ญ๐๐. Not because I disagree with the core principles behind non-therapeutic chiropractic, many of those ideas align very closely with how I practice. But because it forced me to recognize something that I think many of us overlook. ๐๐ ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐๐ง๐ ๐ ๐ฅ๐จ๐ญ ๐จ๐ ๐ญ๐ข๐ฆ๐ ๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐๐๐ก ๐จ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ซ.
Sometimes those labels help clarify ideas and philosophical differences. But other times they seem to encourage something less productive.
Some Chiropractors have an insatiable desire to debate other Chiropractors and the very definition of Chiropractic and seek to expose the flaws in other โcategoriesโ of Chiropractic using the title of one of BJ Palmerโs books to justify their desire to debate claiming that Conflicts Clarify. They may be right but I, for one, disagree and I donโt choose to spend time or energy debating other Chiropractors.
Spending our time debating one another is what our profession has done for generations. ๐๐ ๐๐ข๐ซ๐๐ฅ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฐ๐๐ ๐จ๐ง๐ฌโฆ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ง ๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ซ๐ญ ๐ฌ๐ก๐จ๐จ๐ญ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ง๐ฐ๐๐ซ๐. One group says another group isnโt โstraight enough.โ Another says someone isnโt โobjective enough.โ Another insists you canโt be โnon-therapeuticโ if you say certain words or structure care a certain way. Meanwhile, the world outside of chiropractic is still trying to understand what chiropractic even is.
So where do I stand in all of this? I believe the spine matters. I believe the nervous system matters. I believe that subluxations, in and of themselves, are a silent killer. I believe the adjustment matters. I donโt claim to treat diseases and I donโt promise cures, but I absolutely believe that when communication between the brain and the body is clear, people function better. And yes, I still suggest people get their spine checked ๐๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฒ ๐โ๐๐ ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐จ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ข๐ซ ๐ฅ๐ข๐ฏ๐๐ฌ. Call that a care plan if you want, or donโt. At the end of the day Iโm less concerned about which philosophical label someone attaches to me and more concerned about serving the people who walk through my doors.
Which brings me to a question that I think is worth asking. What do YOU think? ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ฌ๐ ๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ฅ๐ฌ ๐ก๐๐ฅ๐ฉ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐๐๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐ฅ๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐ฒ ๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ๐๐ ๐โฆ ๐จ๐ซ ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ฒ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐ซ๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ฆ๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ข๐ง๐ฌ๐ข๐๐ ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐จ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐๐๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง? Iโd honestly like to hear your thoughts. What should we do with these labels, and do you believe they help chiropractic move forward, or hold it back?
In Health and Faith,
Jay