09/12/2025
ā¤ļøš«¶well said!
One of the best things about our industry is the diversity of professionals who care for horses.
Vets, farriers, trainers, saddle fitters, therapists, nutritionists, bodyworkersāwe all bring something different and beautiful to the table.
That diversity should be our greatest strength. When horses and their people have access to a team of knowledgeable professionals, the outcomes are almost always better. Horses recover faster. Owners feel more supported. Professionals learn from each other.
But too often, I see the opposite.
Instead of collaboration, I see competition. Instead of respect, I see judgment.
Instead of building bridges, we build walls.
And hereās the truth: when that happens, horses lose.
š Owners get confused when professionals contradict each other. Sometimes they freeze and do nothing. Other times, they bounce from one professional to the next, never giving any single plan time to work.
š Horses slip through the cracks when interventions are piecemeal or conflicting.
š Trust erodesābetween owners and professionals, and between colleagues.
It doesnāt have to be this way.
Collaboration doesnāt mean we all agree. It doesnāt mean we always do things the same way. What it does mean is listening, respecting, and building solutions together.
Iāve seen both sides:
š¦A mare with back pain whose vet, trainer, farrier, and saddle fitter all pointed fingers at each other. Her owner, overwhelmed, did nothing. By the time she got into rehab, things had worsened.
š¦A young gelding with lameness whose farrier, dentist, trainer, and therapist all worked together, each in their own role but with open lines of communication (we love a group chat). The horse recovered, the owner felt empowered, and the professionals learned from each other.
š§©Same puzzle pieces. Different picture.
The difference wasnāt who was āright.ā The difference was collaboration.
š” But What About Disagreement?
Itās unrealistic to expect everyone on a horseās care team to see things the same way all the time. In fact, disagreement can be valuableāit brings different perspectives to the table.
What matters is how we handle it.
Constructive disagreement looks like this:
šStay curious. Instead of āyouāre wrong,ā try ātell me more about how you see it.ā
šAcknowledge shared goals. Even if we differ on the how, we all want the horse to be comfortable and successful.
šOffer, donāt attack. āHereās what Iāve noticed and why I recommend this,ā is more productive than āthat approach never works.ā
šFind the overlap. Often the best solution is a blend of ideasāa compromise that honors different perspectives.
When handled this way, disagreement doesnāt divide the team. It actually makes the plan stronger.
And honestly, that takes an ego check. If your need to be "the one with the answers" is bigger than your willingness to collaborate, the horse will pay the price. Owners donāt want drama. They want a team who puts the horse first.
So hereās my challenge to all of usāpros and owners alike:
āļø Professionals, letās be open to learning from each other, even when we disagree.
āļø Owners, build teams of people who communicate and respect each other.
āļø And all of usāletās put horses before egos.
Because raising the standard of care wonāt come from one person being āright.ā It will come from all of us, working side by side, united by one mission: the horse comes first. š“š