03/22/2026
https://www.facebook.com/share/1B5reAFCz5/?mibextid=wwXIfr
A lot of people keep asking, “Where’s the proof?” so let’s actually talk about what was presented in the investigation.
This was not one accusation. This was a multi-source investigation built on interviews, documentation, and corroboration.
First, multiple women came forward, including women who say they were minors at the time of the abuse and women who were directly involved in the movement. What makes this significant is that their stories were independent, yet described similar patterns of behavior, including coercion, abuse of power, and repeated s*xual misconduct.
That’s called corroboration. When separate people tell consistent stories about the same type of behavior, it strengthens credibility.
Second, the investigation included dozens of interviews, over 60 people. This wasn’t just victims. It included people who were around at the time, who witnessed dynamics, relationships, and the environment these women were in. That helps establish context and pattern.
Third, there is evidence of a pattern over time, not a one-time accusation. The reports describe behavior that allegedly happened across different years, different locations, and different victims. In investigative reporting, patterns matter because they show this wasn’t random or isolated.
Fourth, there is supporting circumstantial evidence. In at least one case, pregnancies resulted from these encounters and were later confirmed through DNA to be connected to him. That doesn’t by itself prove assault, but it does confirm that the s*xual relationship occurred, which supports the timeline and parts of the testimony.
Fifth, the women explain why they stayed silent for decades. He was a powerful leader. They feared retaliation or not being believed. Some didn’t want to damage a movement they believed in.
That is consistent with what we see in many abuse cases, especially when power dynamics are involved.
Let’s be clear, there was never a trial, so there is no legal verdict. But this investigation presents multiple firsthand accounts, corroboration, supporting evidence, and a documented pattern of behavior.
You don’t have to blindly believe anything, but dismissing it without understanding the evidence isn’t the truth either.