02/19/2023
Cindy said be clearer so this headline in WALL STREET JOURNAL BELOW will TEACH YOU WHAT YOU are UP Against ! MY COMMENTS ON BREAST CANCER ARE IN BOLD BELOW! - I HAVED RISKED MY LIFE for 45 YEARS for PATIENTS - TRUTH SETS US FREE ! FALSEHOOD is NEW SLAVERY among US JOHN ADAMS CONSTITUTION FOR A MORAL PEOPLE NOT TRUE for THIS HEALTH CARE BUSINESS !!!
HERE IS CANCER ARTICLE WITH COMMENTARY - more carefully written at request of Cindy Farkas !
Do Older Patients Need Radiation Rx After Breast Cancer Surgery?( ANorton ) THURSDAY, Feb. 16, 2023 (HealthDay News) -- Many older women with early-stage breast cancer can skip radiation without harming their survival odds, a new clinical trial finds.
The study involved women age 65 and older who had surgery for small breast tumors deemed to be low risk of coming back. Typically, those women undergo radiation after surgery, and then start on hormonal therapy to further drive down the chances of a recurrence.
For a long time, the QUESTION has been whether those patients can safely skip the round of radiation.Based on the new findings, published Feb. 16 in the New England Journal of Medicine, the answer is yes. QUESTION WAS ANSWERED for ~ 30 YEARS WHILE ALTERNATIVE DOCTORS CHASED OUT OF PROFESSION AND COVID 19 WILL SHOW HOW FEW DRUGs and SURGERIES NEEDED
Researchers found that post-surgery radiation made no difference in how long those patients ultimately survived: After 10 years, about 81% of trial participants were still alive, regardless of whether they received radiation. And of women who died during the study period, few -- 13% -- died of breast cancer. YOUR TREATMENTS DIDNT MATTER AFTER 10 YEARS BUT MEDICARE HAS FED DEBT CEILING AND COLLAPSE
Experts said the findings should lay to rest any worries about skipping radiation for the appropriate patients.
"This is great NEWS ," said Dr. Alice Ho, co-director of the Breast Cancer Clinical Research Unit at Duke University in Durham, N.C. GREAT NEWS is THE GOSPEL ! YOU IRRADIATED WOMEN CAUSING HARM and USING GOVERNMENT to TORTURE ME WHO OBJECTED ? WHERE IS APOLOGY TO ALL the WOMEN THAT WERE SEEDED WITH LUNG CANCER BY THIS CHANGE OF TREATMENT ????? And what is the TYPICAL response you will have to this PROLONGED ABUSIVE PATIENTS - THE DOCTORS OF ALTERNATIVE societies report IRS to PHONY WITNESSES at TRIALS
Radiation to the breast can cause side effects, like pain and skin inflammation, and there is a small chance of long-term damage to the heart or lungs. Plus, Ho said, some women would prefer to skip any treatment that is not "absolutely necessary."
"This study gives doctors reassurance that they are not harming patients by offering omission of radiation as an option," said Ho, who co-wrote an editorial published with the study.
There are, though, some important CAVEATS !!!! she and other experts said. CAVEAT is CANCER IS THE BUSINESS NOT HEALTH
For one, the findings do not apply to women younger than 65, said lead researcher Dr. Ian Kunkler. IF IT WERE A MONEY MAKER THEN APPLY DRUG TO OFF LABEL USES !!
"For younger women, postoperative radiotherapy remains STANDARD ," said Kunkler, an oncologist and professor at the University of Edinburgh in Scotland. STANDARD HEALTH is 1/3 die of CANCER 60% OBESE ! NO COUNTRY HAS REPLACED A MEDICAL THEOLOGY OVER RELIGION WITH SUCH POOR RESULTS
He also stressed that the trial included a particular set of breast cancer patients: All had tumors no larger than 3 centimeters and no signs the cancer had spread to lymph nodes in the armpit. They also had hormone-receptor-positive cancer, which means estrogen and progesterone were helping to fuel its growth. Hormonal therapy is recommended for those cancers to help prevent a recurrence, and all of the trial patients started a five-year course of hormonal therapy. DOES STUDY INCLUDE OBESE ? HIGH BMI BUT HIGH MUSCLE ? DEPRESSED PSYCH ? CONCUSSION BRAIN ASSESSMENT ? MEDICAL COMORBIDITIES EQUAL ?
So, the results are relevant only to women like those in the trial, Kunkler said. !!!!!!YET ALL THE RESULTS OF DRUGS ARE USED ~ 70 % off label ! On top of that, even those women may still opt for radiation, both Kunkler and Ho said. MISTAKEN INFORMED CONSENTS OF 10 PAGES GIVEN 1 MINUTE BEFORE TREATMENT ? ETHICAL?
That's because the trial found that radiation did lower the chances of a "local" recurrence -- cancer that comes back within the breast. Over 10 years, just under 1% of patients who received radiation had a local recurrence, versus nearly 10% of those who skipped radiation.WHO HAD BETTER HEALTH ,WHO LIVED LONGER - I WAS TOLD BY MEDICAL BOARD IRRELEVANT !!! Matthew 12 healing on wrong day ! NUTS - john 7:20 wrong BIRTH EUGENICS ( John 8:41) YET HE USED SOME SIMILAR MEHODS WITH THE CONVENTIONAL HEALERS (MATT 12:27) ROMAN MILITARY PROFITED
Plus, Ho said, technology advances in recent years have made radiation both safer and easier. A course of radiation can now take as little as one week.NICE DOSE BETTER CONTROLLED - but any apology to all those who suffered before and the doctors who fought against medical boards for them ?
That point was ECHOED by Dr. Naamit Ge**er, a radiation oncologist at NYU Langone Perlmutter Cancer Center in New York City. ( ECHO HERD EFFECT LIKE AN INQUISITION DIFFERENT OPINIONS FREE SPEECH IN MEDICINE IS WEAK to ZERO !
She said that "many women" may still opt for radiation to minimize the odds of a local recurrence, especially if there's any uncertainty they can stick with five years of hormonal therapy. DOESNT WORK BECAUSE WOMEN GET LUNG CANCER FROM RADIATION
The trial included 1,326 patients with an average age of 71, all of whom had surgery to remove small breast tumors. Half were randomly assigned to undergo radiation for three to five weeks; the other half skipped it. YOUR CARE is PLACATING BUT with NO TOTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVE
After 10 years, survival rates in both groups were nearly identical, at just shy of 81%. Few women in either group suffered a "distant" recurrence (breast cancer that had spread to other areas of the body): 1.6% in the no-radiation group, and 3% in the radiation group.DOUBLE BETTER RESULTS WOULD BE EMPHASIZED IF THIS WAS SELLING A DRUG FOR BETTER PROFITS and shifting democratic useless BENEFITS to MEDICARE PAYMENTS TO PRIVATE DRUG COMPANIES ! Where is Teddy Roosevelt when you need him ?
When it came to local recurrence risk, skipping radiation did raise the odds. But sticking with hormonal therapy mattered, too: Among women who did not receive radiation, the risk of a local recurrence was four times higher for those who stopped hormonal therapy at some point, versus those who continued. TERRIBLE SCIENCE NO CONTROL FOR FAMILY LIFE ! STRESS MEDICAL NEURO or PSYCH - WASTE of MONEY small studies poorly done
It all means that treatment decisions need to be INDIVIDUALIZED , all three doctors said.OMG NO PSYCH or MEDICAL COMORBIDITIES ARE FACTORED in because these are WEAPON SYSTEMS DOCTORS WITH NO GENERAL MEDICAL SUPERVISION !!!
And, Ho noted, decisions around treating early, low-risk breast cancer are actually more complicated, versus more advanced cancer -- because there are more options. CONTROLS NO AGAIN , HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION FOR PROFIT
"We have to let PATIENTS KNOW what the DATA show, and go from there," Ho said. "It's really a collaborative decision." ( DOCTORS CANT UNDERSTAND THEIR DATA SO HOW WILL PATIENT, THIS IS NOT INFORMED CONSENT but DISINGENUOUS CONSENT FOR FUND RAISING ! FOR SHIFTING INSURANCE TAX DOLLARS ?
As for younger women with early-stage breast cancer, trials are underway to identify those who could safely skip radiation. THIS IS KNOWN for 30 YEARS AND IF YOU LISTEN BLINDLY YOU never GET FREE of the CANCER DOCTOR LIFE AND ITS ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE to SWITCH DOCTORS AS FILE is BIG COMPLEX
I tell you the truth, that John Winthrop, on the 400 year anniversary of his speech for US to be a city on a Hill will rise up against this generation and REBUKE THEM !
