09/27/2025
I'm #2 on the "mis-influencer" list of experts due to my popular posts challenging the nutrient-deficient "Planetary Health Diet" promoted by "EAT-Lancet", which caps red meat at 1.5 oz/day and allocates a majority of calories to grains.
This is an anti-human diet.
It promotes ill health and lacks the basic nutrients needed to sustain human life and promote healthy reproduction.
Apparently, cancel culture is alive and well with EAT Lancet, which evidently aims to vilify people talking about the health benefits of red meat (nutrient density, low-calorie complete protein).
A term like "misinformation" now tend to have a boomerang effect--as it did with school lockdowns--only making people want to know more about this "dangerous" information.
A recent clinical trial on the EAT-Lancet diet found that after 12 weeks, participants on this diet saw significant declines in Vitamins A (‒25%), B1 (‒11%), B2 (‒16%), B3 (‒16%), calcium (‒16%), zinc (‒13%), potassium (‒10%), selenium (‒15%), and iodine (‒26%), vitamins B6 (‒12%), vitamin B12 (‒36%), vitamin C (‒23%), vitamin D (‒28%) and vitamin K1 (30%).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.09.009
Does a nutrient-deficient diet sound like it's good for health?
Dr. Shawn Baker MD Ken D Berry, MD