01/22/2026
Genesis named a woman “Ornament.”
Another one “Shadow.”
And we act like the Bible endorses patriarchy.
Here’s what you missed:
When Scripture names women as decoration and background, it’s not prescribing how things should be.
It’s diagnosing how far we’d fallen.
Genesis 2: Woman created as image-bearer, partner, “bone of my bones”
Genesis 4: Women named Adah (ornament) and Zillah (shadow)
By the time we get to Lamech—the guy who boasts about killing and takes two wives—women aren’t partners anymore.
They’re:
- Valued for appearance (ornament)
- Or tolerated in obscurity (shadow)
One is seen. One is hidden.
Both are reduced.
This isn’t ancient history. This is:
- Women valued primarily for how they look
- Worth tied to youth and beauty standards
- “Trophy wife” language
- Essential work going unacknowledged
- Expected to be agreeable and pleasant
- Penalized for having boundaries
The system Genesis 4 exposed is still operating.
But watch what happens:
After these names, women almost disappear from the text.
Not because they stopped existing, but because Scripture is showing us: when women are reduced to function, they vanish from the story even though they’re still there.
Then, when does the next woman get named?
Genesis 11. Sarah.
Her name doesn’t mean ornament or shadow.
It means princess.
Dignity. Standing. Personhood.
And she appears exactly when God re-enters history redemptively.
When covenant replaces domination, women get their names back.
Then Jesus shows up and treats women as:
- Full image-bearers
- Essential witnesses (first to see resurrection!)
- Disciples and teachers
- Valued for who they are, not what they provide
Genesis 4 shows the fracture.
Jesus shows the restoration.
The question is: Which system are you living in?
Are you reducing women to ornament, shadow, pleasant aesthetic?
Or are you seeing them—really seeing them—as full image-bearers of God?
The names tell the story. Pay attention.
New blog post at link in bio 🔥