12/23/2025
What happens when your scanner captures more¹ area, scans faster², and delivers accuracy you can rely on³?
For Dr. Steven Glassman, cosmetic dentist and co-owner of Glassman Dental Care, the iTero Lumina™ intraoral scanner delivers a new level of precision that elevates both efficiency and patient care.
✅ A field of view up to 3× larger¹.
✅ Designed with a 25 mm capture distance, it simplifies scanning of palates, edentulous spaces, and crowded or partially erupted teeth.
✅ Faster scanning²: The iTero Lumina™ intraoral scanner is designed to enable 2× faster scanning compared with previous iTero™ intraoral scanners.
✅ Superior clinical accuracy³: Comparative testing showed the iTero Lumina™ scanner delivering more accurate data than the other scanners evaluated.
✅ Predictable, first-time restoration fits⁴: Consistent accuracy supports reliable crown and veneer results that fit right the first time, reducing reappointments for both doctor and patient.
Discover how Dr. Glassman’s digital workflow is transforming restorative care. See more here: www.itero.com/en-eu
¹ The iTero Lumina™ intraoral scanner offers 3× larger field of view designed for more surface-area capture enabling faster scanning. Compared to the field of view of the iTero Element™ 5D imaging system, when the iTero Lumina™ intraoral scanner’s scanning distance is 12 mm. Data on file at Align Technology, as of November 15, 2023.
² Compared to the iTero Element™ 5D imaging system with tolerance AVE = ±0.1 operating at a working distance from 0–20 mm. Data on file at Align Technology, as of November 15, 2023.
³ Based on bench testing conducted using ADA/ANSI 132 standard model simulating “long distance accuracy (full jaw measurement)” in July 2024. Method: comparative test of full-arch accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility; n = 90 scans per scanner; scanners tested: iTero Lumina, Trios 5, CS3800, Medit i700, Allied Star. The accuracy of iTero Lumina™ was significantly higher than all 4 competitors, with a reduction of total error ranging from 0.11 % to 0.46 %. Data on file at Align Technology, as of August 26, 2024.
⁴ Based on bench testing conducted in June 2024 according to ADA/ANSI 132 standard requirements for long-distance full-jaw accuracy (average error = 0.03 %–0.24 % < 0.25 %), crown accuracy (average error = 0 %–0.9 % < 1 %), and inlay accuracy specimens (average error = 0 %–0.4 % < 1 %). Data on file at Align Technology, as of August 26, 2024.
