03/06/2026
Academic researchers have long sought sources of funding beyond the public purse, including that from the many thousands of private donors who give to science. These sources are coming under renewed scrutiny owing to the case of Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted s*x offender who was also a significant donor to research. Mathematical biology and artificial intelligence were among the fields he funded.
The release of Epstein’s correspondence by the US Department of Justice at the end of January has provided detailed insight into the links that individual scientists and their institutions had with this one donor — and shows that some researchers maintained those links even after Epstein was convicted.
The default response of most in academia has been to say very little, in the hope of avoiding scrutiny, unless a clear connection to Epstein emerges. But the fact that an individual with no scientific expertise who was convicted of child s*x abuse in 2008 was able to ingratiate himself deeply with academics and influence research for years points to a serious cultural failing.
A recent article in Nature points to a need for new rules on links with rich donors; read the article at:
A systemic failure of oversight allowed the s*x offender Jeffrey Epstein to curry favour with academia. Stronger governance is urgently needed.