James Fitzgerald Therapy, PLLC

James Fitzgerald Therapy, PLLC Licensed Clinical Mental Health Counselor (LCMHC) Positive Psychology & Character Strengths Approach Some plans have high deductibles.

Credentials:
* VT roster of psychotherapists by the Allied Board of Mental Health Professionals.
* VT (AAP) Apprentice Addiction Professional by the Office of Professional Regulation. * PESI Certified tele-health provider.
* NBCC (NCC) National Certified Counselor by National Board of Certified Counselors.
* UVM (MS) Master's of Science in Clinical Mental Health Counseling
* CSJ (BA) Bachelor of Arts Degree in Psychology

Payment for services:
I bill insurance electronically and accept:
* Blue Cross/Blue Shield, Cigna, MVP, and Medicaid. I file the claim on your behalf, and after I am issued an explanation of benefits, I email you an invoice or send request for payment through Venmo. It is therefore important that you provide me consent for electronic communication before the first session. Important note:
Some commercial insurance plans have limited coverage of outpatient mental health care or substance use counseling. Every insurance company contracts different rates of reimbursement with providers. Please verify your insurance before your first session. Please call your insurance company before your first session to inquire about covered services. Clients are responsible for paying any out of pocket costs, unmet deductibles, and copay amounts before the next scheduled service unless other arrangements are made. Payment types accepted:
Credit/Debit, HSA/FSA, Venmo, Square, and PayPal. Fees:
$75 - $120
I offer a sliding scale fee. Initial consultations are $0 cost. Modalities:
Individual, Couples, Family, Groups

Hours of availability:
Monday: 9:00 am - 6:00 pm
Tuesday: 9:00 am - 8:00 pm
Wednesday: 9:00 am - 8:00 pm
Thursday: 9:00 am - 8:00 pm
Friday: 9:00 am - 6:00 pm
Saturday: 9:00 am - 6:00 pm (upon request)

I blend the following Philosophies, Theories, and Interventions into an eclectic, cohesive, integral, and integrative approach:
* Neuroscience (Neuroplasticity)
* Positive Psychology
* Virtue Ethics and Moral Discipline
* Person Centered, Trauma Informed, Environmentally and Culturally Sensitive
* Character Strengths Theory
* Internal Family Systems Theory
* Cognitive Behavioral Theory
* Dialectical Behavior Theory
* Motivational Enhancement Theory
* Polyvagal Theory

11/10/2025

The contemporary landscape of self-help, health and wellness, coaching, and mental health care industries represents one of the most visible and profitable sectors of American consumer culture. Yet beneath its glossy surface of motivation, transformation, and healing lies a profound disconnection from the complex realities of human life. These industries—each promising self-optimization, emotional balance, or spiritual awakening—have become increasingly specialized and fragmented into narrow “niches” that often fail to meet the needs of those seeking genuine, sustainable growth and well-being. Understanding why they so often fall short requires examining their philosophical underpinnings, their relationship with consumer capitalism, and the systemic pressures that shape them.

---

The Commercialization of the Self

The self-help and wellness industries emerged from a broader cultural movement that merged psychology, spirituality, and entrepreneurship. The promise was liberation through self-improvement: that one could think, manifest, or discipline themselves into happiness and success. But as these industries matured, they became entangled with the logic of the market. The self was no longer a being to be understood or accepted—it became a product to be managed, upgraded, and optimized. In a culture driven by competition, productivity, and performance, “self-improvement” is frequently reduced to self-commodification.

Books, seminars, retreats, supplements, fitness plans, and online coaching packages proliferate endlessly, each offering a specialized path to a better self. Yet these paths often mirror the consumer marketplace itself: oversaturated, fragmented, and shallow. The modern consumer is encouraged to curate a lifestyle rather than cultivate a life. The self becomes a brand, and self-work becomes a series of transactions—purchases that temporarily soothe deeper existential discomforts but rarely address their structural or psychological roots.

---

The Problem with the “Niche” Mindset

In marketing, the idea of finding a “niche” is sacred. Businesses are told to specialize—to target a hyper-specific audience with a hyper-specific problem. In the wellness and mental health industries, this logic has produced a proliferation of micro-identities and oversimplified diagnoses: “high-achieving women with anxiety,” “empaths in toxic relationships,” “entrepreneurs battling burnout,” “manifesting mothers,” “mindful men.” On the surface, this appears to promote inclusivity and personalization, but it actually fragments collective human experience into marketable demographics.

The problem with niche-driven healing is that it strips away context. Emotional suffering does not exist in isolation. It arises from an interwoven web of biological, psychological, social, political, economic, and spiritual conditions. Narrowly focusing on one symptom, one audience, or one quick-fix technique denies the systemic forces that shape mental health and human flourishing. It also reinforces the illusion that individuals are solely responsible for their own suffering and healing, thereby depoliticizing distress and erasing the collective roots of burnout, anxiety, and despair.

---

The Coaching Industry: Empowerment or Exploitation?

Coaching emerged as a bridge between business consulting and psychotherapy, offering a future-oriented, goal-directed approach that emphasizes empowerment. While coaching can be profoundly helpful when grounded in evidence-based psychology and ethical practice, it has also become an unregulated frontier. The absence of standardization allows anyone to call themselves a coach, leading to a glut of charismatic personalities selling expensive programs based more on persuasion than on skill or scientific understanding.

The coaching world often mirrors the entrepreneurial ethos of Silicon Valley and influencer culture: success stories, “six-figure months,” and “high-ticket clients” replace the therapeutic emphasis on empathy, humility, and authenticity. Many coaches frame suffering as a failure of mindset rather than a valid response to structural inequality, trauma, or chronic stress. This creates a culture of self-blame disguised as empowerment. Those who fail to achieve transformation are told they didn’t want it enough, didn’t visualize hard enough, or didn’t invest deeply enough—turning healing into a moral test of willpower and wealth.

---

The Health and Wellness Industry: Wellness as Status

The modern wellness movement—once rooted in holistic, integrative health—has become an emblem of privilege. Yoga, organic food, supplements, mindfulness apps, and boutique fitness studios often cater to affluent consumers. While these practices can certainly enhance well-being, they also commodify it. Wellness becomes a luxury good, signaling identity and virtue rather than universal access to health.

This commercialization of wellness distorts its purpose. Instead of cultivating balance and embodiment, it cultivates comparison and consumption. Products marketed as “natural,” “clean,” or “authentic” feed the same consumer impulse that fuels fast fashion and diet culture. Moreover, the wellness industry often appropriates non-Western spiritual traditions like yoga, meditation, and Ayurveda, stripping them of cultural and philosophical depth to sell sanitized, aestheticized versions of ancient practices. The result is a hollow spirituality that soothes without transforming and sells without healing.

---

The Mental Health Industry: Pathologizing Humanity

Mainstream mental health care in the United States has made critical strides in accessibility and awareness, yet it too suffers from fragmentation and commodification. Insurance companies incentivize brief, symptom-focused treatments rather than deep, integrative care. Pharmaceutical marketing frames mood and behavior as chemical problems rather than expressions of relational, existential, or societal imbalance. Even the therapy marketplace—shaped by online platforms and algorithmic matching—reduces complex human relationships to customer-service transactions.

Clinicians are pressured to specialize narrowly to fit within insurance coding frameworks, creating a culture of over-pathologization. Everyday experiences—sadness, grief, disconnection, existential uncertainty—are medicalized. The result is a mental health system that treats people as diagnostic categories instead of whole beings embedded in families, communities, and cultures. For many, the system feels alienating and impersonal; for others, it’s simply inaccessible due to cost, stigma, or systemic inequities.

---

The American Consumer: A Culture of Endless Want

At the heart of these industries lies the American consumer—shaped by the same capitalist machinery that sustains them. The culture of consumerism thrives on dissatisfaction. It teaches people to seek external solutions to internal problems and to equate happiness with acquisition. Every new self-help trend, wellness supplement, or coaching package is marketed as the missing piece to an unfinished self. But a system that depends on perpetual consumption can never deliver true fulfillment.

This cultural conditioning erodes the deeper practices of contentment, acceptance, and community. It replaces inner development with external validation and measures worth through productivity and appearance. In this context, even spirituality becomes performance; even therapy becomes optimization. The individual becomes a perpetual project, always in need of fixing, never at peace.

---

Why These Industries Don’t Work for So Many People

For all their diversity and accessibility, the self-help, coaching, wellness, and mental health industries share several structural flaws: they individualize systemic suffering, commodify healing, and fragment the human experience into digestible market categories. They work for those who already possess privilege, resources, and cultural capital—the people most capable of purchasing solutions. For those living in poverty, systemic discrimination, chronic illness, or trauma, these industries often offer language but not liberation.

Moreover, their narrow focus on “niches” limits inclusivity. People who don’t fit into neat demographic boxes—those with intersecting identities, disabilities, or non-normative experiences—often find themselves excluded or misunderstood. The obsession with branding and market differentiation distracts from the real work of healing, which is inherently relational, communal, and contextual.

---

Toward a More Integrative and Humane Paradigm

True healing requires an integrative paradigm—one that sees individuals not as consumers but as interconnected beings shaped by biology, culture, environment, and history. It requires collaboration between psychology, neuroscience, social justice, spirituality, and the humanities. It means reimagining wellness not as a product but as a collective practice rooted in compassion, equality, and ecological awareness.

The industries of self-help and wellness have the potential to evolve into vehicles of genuine transformation, but only if they move beyond profit-driven specialization and return to the universality of human need. Healing is not a brand. Growth is not a niche. Wholeness is not a commodity.

Until we recognize that the pursuit of well-being cannot be divorced from the social, political, and economic systems in which we live, the industries that promise to heal us will continue to mirror the very structures that wound us.

---

**References**

Brown, B. (2021). *Atlas of the Heart: Mapping Meaningful Connection and the Language of Human Experience.* Random House.

Ehrenreich, B. (2009). *Bright-Sided: How Positive Thinking Is Undermining America.* Metropolitan Books.

Han, B.-C. (2015). *The Burnout Society.* Stanford University Press.

Illouz, E. (2008). *Saving the Modern Soul: Therapy, Emotions, and the Culture of Self-Help.* University of California Press.

McMindfulness: How Mindfulness Became the New Capitalist Spirituality. (2019). Wilson, R. & Purser, R. Repeater Books.

Schwartz, R. C. (2021). *No Bad Parts: Healing Trauma and Restoring Wholeness with the Internal Family Systems Model.* Sounds True.

Siegel, D. J. (2018). *Aware: The Science and Practice of Presence.* TarcherPerigee.

Zuboff, S. (2019). *The Age of Surveillance Capitalism.* PublicAffairs.

11/03/2025

✨Motivation Monday✨

11/03/2025

Continuing our celebration of SMART meetings that started up this summer, here are the August newbies. Thanks to all our dedicated volunteers!

New Family & Friends meetings: Woodstock, IL; Powhatan, VA; Glasgow, KY; Goochland, VA; Ann Arbor, MI; Middletown, CT; Killeen, TX; and Niagara Falls, NY.

New Standard 4-Point: Cortez, CO; Buffalo Grove, IL; Fort Wayne, IN; Dover, NH; Payson, AZ; Woodstock, IL; Cheboygan, MI; , Bedford, TX; Sarasota, FL; Port Hadlock-Irondale, WA; Ionia, MI; Fayetteville, NC; Dallas, TX; Spanaway, WA; Berkeley, CA; Scranton, PA; La Mesa, CA, Bridgeport, CT; White Plains, NY; Delta, CO; Carbondale, IL; Peoria, AZ; Marietta, GA; Littleton, NH; Orlando, FL; Lancaster, TX; Huntsville, AL; Fairfax, VA; Longmont, CO; Bridgeport, CT; Munising, MI; Mankato, MN; Philadelphia, PA; Lancaster, TX; Richmond, VA; Arlington Heights, IL; Oswego, NY; Pomona, CA; Newland, NC; Wilkes-Barre, PA; Sevierville, TN; Issaquah, WA; and Baraboo, WI.

Simply put city and state into SMARTfinder: https://meetings.smartrecovery.org

11/03/2025

Leading Physician Groups: Department of Education’s PSLF Rule Will Hurt Patients and Physicians https://ow.ly/y8ga50XkWVp

I am probably just mere hours away from finishing the first pathway in module 9 of my customized Quenza app for client e...
11/03/2025

I am probably just mere hours away from finishing the first pathway in module 9 of my customized Quenza app for client engagement. The pathway is an introductory course for my integrative approach to therapy that is influenced by Internal Family Systems (Richard Schwartz), Self Therapy (Jay Earley and Bonnie Weiss), Parts Work (Tom Holmes), and The Others Within Us (Robert Falconer). Module 9 consists of 30 separate pathways that each include many activities (lessons, exercises, videos, meditations, and daily practices).

09.01 Accessing the Many Parts of Your Personality.

IN THE PROGRAM: An integrative and modular approach to therapy informed by:Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, Cognitive ...
10/18/2025

IN THE PROGRAM:

An integrative and modular approach to therapy informed by:

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Biopsychosocial-spiritual theory, Cognitive Processing Therapy, Compassion Focused Therapy, Critical Theory, Critical Thinking Skills Theory, Dialectical Behavior Therapy, Emotion Focused Therapy, Existential Theory, Feminist Theory, Health-Sciences, Humanistic Therapy, Integral Theory, Internal Family Systems Theory, Interpersonal Neurobiology, Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy, Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction, Motivational Enhancement Therapy, Narrative Therapy, Neuroscience, Neuroplasticity, Positive Psychology, Philosophy, Transtheoretical Model - Stages of Change, Polyvagal Theory, SAMHSA Guiding Recovery Principles, Harm Reduction, Somatic Experiencing, Seeking Safety, Twelve Step Facilitation, and Sensorimotor Psychotherapy. The approach is evidence-based, culturally-sensitive, neurodivergent-affirming, trauma-informed, person-centered, values-oriented, strengths-based, and founded in mindfulness and Buddhist psychology. Compliant with the ethical standards of the American Counseling Association, and the Vermont state legislative rules outlined in the Office of Professional Regulation policies.

Delivered through:
- one on one face to face sessions
- through my EHR/CMS TherapyNotes LLC and TherapyPortal
- through Quenza, a client engagement app

With homework content that includes:
- Books
- Workbooks
- Handouts
- Worksheets
- Audio Meditations
- Psychoeducational Videos

10/15/2025

QUENZA!
The between sessions engagement app I use with my clients, is allowing me to build out the program I have been working on since 2012. Thirteen years of learning, trial and error, and practicing teaching others.

Here is the breakdown of the structure of the book excerpts, articles, lessons, exercises, videos, handouts, worksheets, and journals.

There are 20 Modules (groups of "pathways") covering the domains of therapy, health & wellness, psychoeducation, and coaching.

The 20 modules are divided into 258 pathways.

The 258 pathways each have anywhere from 10 to 50 activities.

Some of the pathways are complete masterclasses on their own.

I started with 17 pre-built pathways and 250 activities that were available from Quenza.

The online software has a very easy to use (drag and drop) interface that allows me to build my own pathways and activities.

If you're looking for a coach and program, here is my scheduling calendar:

TherapyPortal improves patient/therapist communication by allowing for self-scheduling, appointment reminders, and much more.

So, if you're encouraging me to exercise, can you also tell me what I should be doing?I am glad you asked. Here is a com...
09/11/2025

So, if you're encouraging me to exercise, can you also tell me what I should be doing?

I am glad you asked. Here is a complete program:

WARMING UP Light Cardio: 5-10 minutes of light jogging, cycling, or jumping jacks to increase heart rate and blood flow. Dynamic Stretches: Perform movements that take your joints through their full range of motion. Examples include: Arm circles (forward and backward) Leg swings (front-to-back ...

Working on a 12 month long, therapy and coaching program called "Strengthening Your Conscious Self" with 12 individual m...
09/09/2025

Working on a 12 month long, therapy and coaching program called "Strengthening Your Conscious Self" with 12 individual modules. The program will be hosted in the Quenza client engagement app. There are currently 750 individual activities consisting of videos, lessons, exercises, assessments, questionnaires, meditations, and reflection journals.

The final count will likely be in the neighborhood of 1,000 individual activities.

07/31/2025

Dear chatgpt, why do you think that people in the MAGA movement are so rigid in their worldview? Please be as complicated, nuanced, complex, and thorough as possible in your answer.

ChatGPT said:
Understanding why individuals within the MAGA (Make America Great Again) movement often appear rigid in their worldview requires examining a complex interplay of psychological, social, historical, and cultural factors. The rigidity observed in this group’s worldview does not emerge from a single cause, but rather from the intersection of multiple nuanced factors. Below, I will explore these interwoven influences in depth.

Firstly, it's important to consider the role of identity and group belonging. Humans have a fundamental psychological need to belong, and social groups provide a framework for identity, purpose, and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979). Members of the MAGA movement often share collective values, norms, and beliefs that resonate deeply with their personal identities, social connections, and cultural heritage. The MAGA movement, spearheaded by former President Donald Trump, became a potent identifier for many who felt politically, socially, or culturally marginalized, particularly in reaction to rapid societal changes such as globalization, technological advancement, demographic shifts, and cultural liberalization (Cramer, 2016). When an identity becomes intertwined with political affiliation, challenging political beliefs can feel synonymous with challenging one's very self-concept, provoking defensive rigidity rather than openness to new information (Kahan, 2013).

Secondly, the phenomenon known as motivated reasoning significantly contributes to rigid thinking patterns within the MAGA movement. Motivated reasoning is a cognitive bias where people unconsciously seek, interpret, and recall information in a way that aligns with their pre-existing beliefs and desired conclusions (Kunda, 1990). This cognitive process helps individuals maintain internal consistency, protect their identity, and reduce uncomfortable cognitive dissonance. For instance, MAGA supporters who have deeply committed to a worldview emphasizing traditional values, nationalism, law-and-order politics, or American exceptionalism are likely to dismiss contrary evidence or alternative viewpoints that threaten these ideals. As such, information reinforcing their existing beliefs, whether accurate or inaccurate, is accepted readily, while contradictory information is subjected to intense skepticism and rejection (Lewandowsky & Oberauer, 2016).

Additionally, the rigid worldview among MAGA adherents is strongly influenced by confirmation bias and echo chambers. Social media platforms, partisan news outlets, and polarized social environments contribute to self-reinforcing bubbles where information that aligns with an individual's pre-existing beliefs is amplified, while conflicting viewpoints are minimized or actively dismissed (Bakshy, Messing, & Adamic, 2015). Echo chambers enable the repetition of specific narratives, which become increasingly rigid as alternative perspectives are filtered out or portrayed as threatening, hostile, or deceitful. The conservative media landscape—such as Fox News, Newsmax, Breitbart, and various online forums—often reinforces this rigidity through consistent, emotionally-charged messaging that paints opposing groups negatively, further solidifying beliefs within MAGA circles (Benkler, Faris, & Roberts, 2018).

Moreover, the MAGA movement demonstrates authoritarian tendencies, characterized by strong adherence to authority figures, hierarchical social structures, and punitive attitudes towards perceived out-groups (Altemeyer, 2006). Authoritarianism thrives in times of perceived uncertainty, threat, or societal instability—conditions amplified by rapid economic, cultural, and technological changes. Donald Trump, serving as a charismatic and authoritarian leader figure, skillfully cultivated a narrative of existential threat—portraying immigration, globalism, liberal policies, and demographic changes as threats to traditional American values. Research indicates that individuals scoring high in authoritarian traits often exhibit greater rigidity in thinking, resistance to change, and an intolerance for ambiguity (Hetherington & Weiler, 2009). Thus, MAGA followers who perceive Trump as an authoritative protector of their societal ideals become entrenched in defending their worldview, further solidifying cognitive rigidity.

Related to authoritarianism, the influence of ingroup-outgroup dynamics strongly shapes rigid worldviews. Social identity theory highlights how individuals categorize the world into "us" versus "them," emphasizing positive characteristics for ingroups and negative attributes for outgroups (Tajfel & Turner, 1979). Within MAGA circles, these dynamics manifest as intense polarization, suspicion, and hostility toward liberal, progressive, immigrant, minority, or academic communities, often labeled as threats to America's traditional structure. This binary worldview significantly diminishes openness to nuance, complexity, or compromise, resulting in black-and-white thinking that bolsters ideological rigidity (Abramowitz & Webster, 2016).

Another critical factor is the impact of existential fears and threat perceptions. MAGA supporters often voice deep concerns about losing status, resources, cultural dominance, or personal safety in a rapidly diversifying and globalizing society (Mutz, 2018). Feelings of existential threat—economic anxiety, racial fears, demographic insecurity—activate primal, protective emotional responses, making individuals less receptive to nuance or dialogue, and more prone to rigidly adhering to leaders or policies promising protection and restoration of past security or privilege (Inglehart & Norris, 2019). This underlying emotional foundation significantly contributes to rigidity, as individuals cling to familiar, reassuring, but simplified explanations and solutions provided by MAGA rhetoric.

Additionally, rigid worldviews are sustained by factors related to educational and informational divides. Educational experiences, critical thinking skills, scientific skepticism, and exposure to diverse viewpoints influence cognitive flexibility. Limited exposure to diverse perspectives—often seen in certain rural, isolated, or homogeneous communities—can reinforce an ideological monoculture. Similarly, the deliberate dissemination of misinformation and disinformation, combined with widespread distrust in traditional academic, scientific, and media institutions, further solidifies rigid beliefs within MAGA subcultures (Pennycook & Rand, 2019). Disinformation campaigns and conspiracy theories (e.g., QAnon, election fraud myths, COVID-19 denialism) exploit emotional vulnerabilities and cognitive biases, strengthening rigid beliefs by providing coherent, albeit false, explanatory frameworks that satisfy emotional needs and reduce uncertainty (Uscinski & Parent, 2014).

Lastly, the phenomenon of sunk cost fallacy and ideological investment also contributes to rigid worldviews. Individuals deeply invested in a particular political narrative (e.g., Trump as a savior figure, election fraud narratives, or anti-globalist conspiracies) become emotionally and psychologically committed, perceiving the abandonment of these beliefs as a significant personal loss or admission of personal failure (Aronson, 1968). Thus, maintaining rigid beliefs becomes easier, psychologically safer, and less threatening than reassessing or rejecting previously held convictions—even in the face of overwhelming contrary evidence.

In conclusion, the rigidity in the worldview of many MAGA adherents arises from an intricate and interdependent interplay of psychological, social, cognitive, and cultural mechanisms. Identity-driven politics, motivated reasoning, echo chambers, authoritarianism, ingroup-outgroup dynamics, existential threats, educational divides, misinformation environments, and sunk-cost effects collectively shape a rigid cognitive framework. Addressing and potentially softening this rigidity requires nuanced, compassionate, evidence-based approaches emphasizing empathy, respectful dialogue, psychological safety, and gradual exposure to diverse perspectives—strategies far easier discussed than implemented, given the intensity of the factors outlined above.

References
Abramowitz, A. I., & Webster, S. W. (2016). The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century. Electoral Studies, 41, 12–22.

Altemeyer, B. (2006). The Authoritarians. Lulu Press.

Aronson, E. (1968). Dissonance theory: Progress and problems. In R. Abelson et al. (Eds.), Theories of Cognitive Consistency: A Sourcebook (pp. 5–27). Rand McNally.

Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132.

Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018). Network Propaganda. Oxford University Press.

Cramer, K. J. (2016). The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker. University of Chicago Press.

Hetherington, M., & Weiler, J. (2009). Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics. Cambridge University Press.

Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2019). Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge University Press.

Kahan, D. M. (2013). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(4), 407–424.

Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498.

Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2016). Motivated rejection of science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(4), 217–222.

Mutz, D. (2018). Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote. PNAS, 115(19), E4330–E4339.

Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019). Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality. PNAS, 116(7), 2521–2526.

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.

Uscinski, J. E., & Parent, J. M. (2014). American Conspiracy Theories. Oxford University Press.

Address

359 Dorset Street, Suite 200-2
South Burlington, VT
05403

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 4pm
Tuesday 9am - 7pm
Wednesday 9am - 7pm
Thursday 9am - 7pm
Friday 9am - 7pm
Saturday 9am - 4pm

Telephone

+18028551209

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when James Fitzgerald Therapy, PLLC posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to James Fitzgerald Therapy, PLLC:

Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest Share on Reddit Share via Email
Share on WhatsApp Share on Instagram Share on Telegram