Family Practice Associates

Family Practice Associates Doctors office

Christmas Holiday Hours!!!
12/22/2025

Christmas Holiday Hours!!!

This is one reason why I quickly stop ACE inhibitors,(like lisinopril), when new patients come to me on these medication...
12/21/2025

This is one reason why I quickly stop ACE inhibitors,(like lisinopril), when new patients come to me on these medications. The other reason, (that most doctors are completely unaware of), is that studies have shown that lisinopril creates a metabolite in the body that accumulates in lung tissue, and increases the risk of lung cancer.

Did you know that blood pressure medication & angioedema side effects can be life-threatening? I've seen patients develop severely swollen lips and tongues w...

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=122152074800696734&set=a.122112232946696734&type=3
12/21/2025

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=122152074800696734&set=a.122112232946696734&type=3

A 14-year-old boy lay dying at 65 pounds, drifting in and out of consciousness. His father agreed to inject him with an experimental drug never tested on humans. That injection changed medicine forever.
Toronto General Hospital, early January 1922. Leonard Thompson was disappearing. At 14 years old, he weighed only 65 pounds. His hair was falling out. The smell of acetone hung on his breath—a sign his body was consuming itself. He drifted in and out of a diabetic coma.
Three years earlier, Leonard had been diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes. In 1919, that diagnosis was a death sentence. There was no treatment. No cure. Just a brutal countdown to the inevitable.
The only thing doctors could offer was starvation. They called it "careful dietary regulation." Leonard's doctor restricted him to 450 calories a day—less than two small meals. The logic was cruel but simple: if sugar was killing him, he should eat almost nothing that could become sugar.
It bought him time. Not much. Not enough.
Children with diabetes wasted away on these starvation diets. Some lasted a year. Most didn't make it that long. They died of malnutrition if the disease didn't kill them first. Parents watched their children fade, knowing there was nothing anyone could do.
By December 1921, Leonard was out of time. His parents, Harry and Florence Thompson, brought him to Toronto General Hospital. He was skeletal. Weak. Slipping away.
The doctors told Harry Thompson the truth: his son was dying. There was nothing conventional medicine could offer.
But there was something unconventional. Something experimental. Something that had never been tried on a human being.
Harry Thompson had to make an impossible choice.
While Leonard fought for his life, a young surgeon named Frederick Banting was working on a theory in a makeshift laboratory at the University of Toronto. Banting believed the pancreas produced an internal secretion that regulated blood sugar. If he could isolate it, maybe—just maybe—he could treat diabetes.
Banting was tenacious but not particularly distinguished. When he'd first approached Professor John Macleod with his idea, Macleod had been skeptical. Eventually, Macleod gave Banting a cramped lab, some dogs to experiment on, and a medical student named Charles Best to help with the chemistry.
Through the summer of 1921, Banting and Best worked obsessively. They removed the pancreases from dogs, induced diabetes, then injected the animals with pancreatic extract. The results were undeniable: blood sugar dropped. Symptoms improved. Dogs on the verge of death recovered.
Colleagues looked at their "thick brown muck" and doubted it would ever work in humans.
By November 1921, Banting and Best had announced their discovery to the scientific community. By January 1922, with biochemist James Collip working to purify the extract and Macleod providing oversight, they had something they believed might work in a human patient.
They needed someone desperate enough to try.
Leonard Thompson was that desperate.
On January 11, 1922, doctors administered the first human injection of pancreatic extract. Leonard's father stood by, watching, praying, hoping for a miracle.
The injection failed.
The extract was too impure. Leonard developed hives—an allergic reaction. His blood sugar barely moved. There was no improvement. No miracle. Just a sick boy getting sicker.
The team could have given up. The first human trial had failed. They could have concluded it was too dangerous, too unpredictable, impossible to translate from dogs to humans.
Instead, they went back to the lab.
James Collip worked day and night to refine the purification process. He optimized the alcohol extraction, removed protein contaminants, washed away lipids and salts. He created a purer, more concentrated formula.
Twelve days passed. Twelve days of Leonard growing weaker. Twelve days of his parents watching and waiting.
On January 23, 1922, doctors injected Leonard Thompson with the refined extract for the second time.
This time, something happened.
Within hours, Leonard's blood sugar levels plummeted from dangerously high to near normal. The acetone smell on his breath began to fade. His vital signs stabilized.
His medical records documented what happened next: "The boy became brighter, more active, looked better and said he felt stronger."
Leonard Thompson—the skeletal 14-year-old who'd been hours from death—started to recover.
He received daily injections from January 23 through early February. He gained weight. His strength returned. The color came back to his face. In May 1922, he went home.
The news spread like wildfire. A dying boy had been brought back from the edge. A disease that had been an absolute death sentence for thousands of years suddenly had a treatment.
Newspapers around the world ran the story. The New York Times declared: "One by one the implacable enemies of man, the diseases which seek his destruction, are overcome by science. Diabetes, one of the most dreaded, is the latest to succumb."
But there was a problem: supply.
Parents flooded the University of Toronto with desperate letters. My daughter is dying. My son has weeks to live. Please, can you send insulin? The demand was overwhelming. The team could barely produce enough for Leonard and a handful of other critically ill patients in Toronto.
Between March and May 1922, production actually failed completely. Collip couldn't replicate his purification process reliably at scale. Leonard went months without steady insulin supply, surviving on whatever batches the team could produce.
It wasn't until October 1922 that Leonard finally had a permanent, steady supply of insulin.
That's when Eli Lilly Company entered the picture. Initially reluctant, the pharmaceutical company partnered with the University of Toronto in mid-1922. They developed industrial-scale production method. By 1923, they were shipping insulin across North America and around the world.
Children who would have died started living. Parents who'd been preparing funerals started planning futures.
In October 1923—just 21 month after Leonard's first successful injection—the Nobel Committee awarded the Prize in Physiology or Medicine to Frederick Banting and John Macleod.
It remains the shortest time between a medical discovery and a Nobel Prize in history.
Banting was furious that Charles Best hadn't been included. He immediately announced he was sharing his prize money with Best. Macleod followed suit, sharing his portion with James Collip.
All four men knew the truth: this hadn't been one person's genius. It had been collaboration, persistence, and one desperate father's willingness to let his dying son become a guinea pig for an untested treatment.
Leonard Thompson lived for 13 more years on insulin. He gained weight. He grew. He lived a relatively normal teenage life and young adulthood—something that would have been impossible three years earlier.
On April 20, 1935, Leonard Thompson died of pneumonia at age 27. The pneumonia was likely a complication of his diabetes, but it wasn't diabetes that killed him. Insulin had given him 13 years. Thirteen years to grow up. Thirteen years his parents never thought they'd have.
Without insulin, Leonard would have died in January 1922 at age 14. Because of insulin, he lived to 27.
Today, more than 100 years later, millions of people live full lives with Type 1 diabetes. They use insulin pens, insulin pumps, continuous glucose monitor. They go to school, build careers, have families, grow old.
Every single one of them owes their life to a 14-year-old boy named Leonard Thompson and his father's courage to try something no one had ever tried before.
Because sometimes progress doesn't come from certainty. It comes from desperate hope. From parents willing to risk everything for a chance. From scientists willing to keep trying after failure. From one person agreeing to be first when "first" might mean death.
Leonard Thompson was the bridge between a world where diabetes was always fatal and a world where it's simply something you manage.
His legacy isn't in textbooks or monuments. It's in every person alive today because of insulin. It's in every parent who didn't have to bury a child with diabetes. It's in every life that continued instead of ending.
The next time you see someone check their blood sugar or use an insulin pen, remember: that simple act was impossible until a 14-years-old boy and his desperate father said yes to an untested injection.
Leonard Thompson proved something essential: hope is never a lost cause. Even when doctors have no answer, even when death seems certain, even when you're down to your last option—sometimes that last option is the one that changes everything.
He was the first person to receive insulin. He was the first to prove it could works. He was the first to show the world that diabetes didn't have to be a death sentence.
And because he went first, millions of others got to go second, third, fourth—got to live when they should have died.
That's not just a medical breakthrough. That's a revolution. One injection, one boy, one impossible choice that change medicine forever.
In honor of Leonard Thompson (1908-1935), the first person to receive insulin and live—proving that sometimes the most powerful medicine isn't certainty, it's courage.

12/20/2025
12/17/2025

The FDA is investigating claims that the COVID-19 vaccine may be connected to deaths. What’s next for vaccine safety?

HOLIDAY HOURS!
12/16/2025

HOLIDAY HOURS!

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=122164673264767455&id=61573023674287
12/14/2025

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=122164673264767455&id=61573023674287

Studies have found that walking 3mph on a super-incline (16%-18%) burns 70% more calories than running on a flat surface.

Walking on an incline engages more muscle groups, particularly in your legs and core, to propel you upwards. This increased muscle recruitment leads to a higher calorie burn.

The increased effort required to walk uphill elevates your heart rate more than walking on a flat surface, even at the same speed. This elevated heart rate is a sign of increased calorie expenditure and cardiovascular demand.

Incline walking also increases the metabolic cost of the activity, meaning your body expends more energy to perform the same distance. This is due to the added challenge of working against gravity.

While running may burn more total calories, incline walking tends to burn a much higher percentage of fat as fuel compared to running, making it a great option if you’re focused on fat loss specifically.

PMCID: PMC4504736; PMID: 22578744

Finally, a government panel has publicly addressed the true, factual scientific evidence about testosterone replacement ...
12/14/2025

Finally, a government panel has publicly addressed the true, factual scientific evidence about testosterone replacement therapy. I have been an expert in Sexual Medicine for over forty years, and apply this expertise in my practice every day. I was a former Assistant Professor of Family Medicine, and the Director of the Human Sexuality course, (among many other things), at Wright State University School of Medicine. And I have been a Clinical Assistant Professor of Family Medicine at The Ohio State University College of Medicine and Public Health for over twenty years, where I was co-director of the Human Sexuality course when it was in its large auditorium lecture format. I have been practicing and teaching about the information discussed by this panel my entire medical career, and it is refreshing to see a government “authority” finally address what we have known in this specialty field for decades.

The Expert Panel on Testosterone Therapy for Men will facilitate discussions on treatments, education, and comprehensive medical care, moving beyond mere sym...

https://www.facebook.com/share/1A3Hsu4aXD/?mibextid=wwXIfr
12/10/2025

https://www.facebook.com/share/1A3Hsu4aXD/?mibextid=wwXIfr

Holding a sleeping baby provides comforting, predictable, nurturing touch (affective touch) that calms the baby’s nervous system, reducing stress hormones and strengthening the communication between the prefrontal cortex (PFC) (rational thought) and the amygdala (fear/emotion center). This builds a strong PFC-amygdala circuit, teaching the brain that stress is manageable and signals safety, which fosters better emotion regulation and reduces the likelihood of an overactive fear response, thereby lowering future anxiety.

🗂️How Holding Strengthens Connections:

📑Calms the Nervous System: Gentle, consistent touch stimulates the release of oxytocin and activates the parasympathetic nervous system, promoting calmness and reducing cortisol (stress hormone) levels.

📑Builds Neural Pathways: This soothing input, especially during sleep when the brain processes emotions, helps form stronger, more efficient neural pathways between the PFC and limbic structures like the amygdala.

📑Provides “Scaffolding”: A caregiver’s presence acts as external regulation, helping the infant’s immature central nervous system manage stress and build its own regulatory capacity.

🗂️How It Prevents Future Anxiety:

📑Better Emotion Regulation: A well-connected PFC can effectively “talk down” the amygdala, preventing overreactions to perceived threats.

📑Creates a “Blueprint” for Safety: Consistent positive experiences teach the infant’s brain that the world is safe and supportive, not threatening, creating a resilient foundation against anxiety.

📑Reduced Amygdala Reactivity: This early buffering effect leads to less intense fear responses and fewer “meltdowns.”

PMID: 33584178

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=122164366364767455&id=61573023674287
12/10/2025

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=122164366364767455&id=61573023674287

A baby’s brain reacts a mother’s singing voice like medicine by activating areas for emotional regulation, memory, and language, fostering bonding and reducing stress through familiar rhythms and voice, which releases calming hormones like oxytocin in both mother and baby, creating a powerful, natural early brain training and mood stabilizer. It’s a synchronized, soothing experience that builds neural pathways and promotes overall well-being, acting as potent emotional support and cognitive development tool.

🗂️How it works in the womb and after birth:

📑Auditory Stimulation: The fetus hears the mother’s voice as early as 18 weeks, building familiarity and recognizing patters, which aids language development later.

📑Hormonal Release: Singing triggers oxytocin (the “love hormone”) and serotonin in the mother whilst pregnant which crosses the placenta which calms the baby and reduces stress and stabilizes heart rate. These same hormones are released directly by the infant if the woman sings both during and after pregnancy.

📑Brain Development: Rhythmic singing stimulates brain regions for memory (hippocampus) and emotion (amygdala), forming richer neural connections and enhancing plasticity.

📑Emotional Regulation: Familiar melodies from the womb soothe newborns, lowering crying and syncing the baby’s arousal levels (measured by sweat) with the mother’s calm state.

📑Bonding & Mood: This familiar sound strengthens the mother-child bond and improves the infant’s mood, acting as powerful, free “medicine” for mental well-being.

🗂️Brain areas activated by music (including singing):

📑Amygdala: Emotional response.
📑Hippocampus: Memory formation.
📑Cerebellum: Movement.
📑Corpus Callosum: Synchronizes brain hemispheres.

Address

2701 Moorefield Road
Springfield, OH
45502

Opening Hours

Monday 8am - 5pm
Tuesday 8am - 5pm
Wednesday 8am - 4:30pm
Thursday 8am - 5pm
Friday 8am - 4:30pm

Telephone

+19373996650

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Family Practice Associates posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest Share on Reddit Share via Email
Share on WhatsApp Share on Instagram Share on Telegram

Category