04/05/2026
Subjective or Objective❓
Is perception reality—or can we know reality as it truly is?
Is reality purely subjective—simply what we believe?
________________________________________
The Tension ⚖️
We can only know the world through our perceptions.
David Hume argued, all knowledge begins with experience—we can never step beyond it.
We have no direct access to “pure” reality.
The external world may exist, but there is no rational justification to believe in it.
What we call reality may simply be a psychological construct, leaving us with a world that is purely subjective.
Yet although all our knowledge begins with experience, it does not follow that it all arises from experience.
Neither reason by itself nor sensation by itself can give us full knowledge.
________________________________________
The Bridge 🌉
Immanuel Kant revolutionized the problem: the mind does not just receive reality—it organizes it. We know not things-in-themselves, but reality as it is structured by the mind.
We can reasonably know that a pure reality exists, but we can never experience pure reality.
A forerunner to Freud and described by Carl Jung as a foundational thinker for modern psychology.
Rather than a priori categories, Jung held that perception is shaped by archetypal patterns.
In Cognitive Science, the map is not the territory—experience is a representation shaped by perceptual filters, not reality itself.
But a well-constructed map can still be useful if it corresponds to the world.
In Viktor Frankl’s Logotherapy, both subjective meaning and objective truth coexist—our personal experience matters, yet it can still point toward something real.
________________________________________
Closing Question ❓
If you can only know reality as it appears, what might you be missing?
Where are the limits of your map—and what lies beyond them?