03/15/2026
If you are having a Baby, had a Baby or want to help somebody who is/has PLEASE copy & paste, tag and share! Get this straightforward info in their hands & hearts!!
13 important questions to ask your pediatrician:
1. Could you point me to the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial(s) (using an inert placebo) that established the long-term safety profile of any of the vaccines on the CDC’s childhood schedule?
2. In what way was the CDC’s childhood vaccine schedule empirically demonstrated to be safe when multiple vaccines are administered at once? For example, more than two-dozen doses by 12 months of age, per the CDC schedule?
Were any double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (using an inert placebo) conducted to assess the combined or cumulative effects of receiving multiple vaccines simultaneously?
3. Are there any studies comparing the long-term health outcomes of completely unvaccinated children to those who are fully vaccinated according to the CDC schedule?
If not, why?
And without that data, on what empirical basis can anyone confidently claim that vaccines are “safe and effective,” when these types of studies are the ones that would actually demonstrate both safety and efficacy?
4. I’ve often heard experts claim that inert-placebo trials for licensed vaccines and a totally unvaccinated vs. fully vaccinated study are “unethical.”
But doesn’t that reasoning itself presuppose the very safety that such trials are meant to test?
Are you suggesting it’s unethical to test a product’s safety unless we already assume it’s safe?
Without that data, on what empirical basis can anyone confidently claim that vaccines are “safe and effective,” when these types of studies are the ones that would actually demonstrate both safety and efficacy?
5. When “placebos” are used in vaccine trials, what do they actually contain?
If they’re another vaccine or an aluminum-containing solution, how can that design detect potential harm from the adjuvants or other vaccine ingredients?
6. What research has measured the total impact of giving infants multiple aluminum-adjuvanted vaccines, taking into account the total amount injected, the baby’s small body size, and their still-developing kidneys?
And if that data doesn’t exist, how do health authorities determine that giving all of these shots together is safe?
7. From my understanding, the primary studies used to justify the safety of aluminum adjuvants when injected are the Flarend et al. (1997) biodistribution study involving four adult rabbits, and the Mitkus et al. (2011) modeling paper based on ingested aluminum in adults, not injected aluminum in infants.
Could you clarify how those studies empirically demonstrate safety in the context of routine pediatric injections?
Were there any double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled human trials using inert placebos to confirm those findings, or is the assumption of safety based solely on these limited animal and modeling studies?
8. Most vaccine “effectiveness” claims are based on antibody titers rather than real-world reduction in disease or all-cause mortality.
Can you point to empirical evidence showing that antibody levels reliably correlate with actual protection and improved long-term health outcomes?
If not, how can “effectiveness” be scientifically validated beyond a surrogate marker?
9. I’ve read that roughly 75% of the FDA’s drug-regulation budget comes from pharmaceutical companies through the Prescription Drug User Fee Act.
How can we be confident that vaccine approvals and safety reviews are completely objective when the agency’s funding depends so heavily on the companies?
Are there genuine safeguards in place to prevent conflicts of interest or bias in the approval and monitoring process?
10. Since the FDA doesn’t conduct its own independent clinical trials and instead relies on studies funded and performed by the manufacturers, how does the agency ensure that the data it reviews are unbiased, accurate, and complete?
And if the FDA’s approval process is based primarily on industry-provided data, can that truly be considered an independent scientific evaluation?
11. Are you aware of the well-documented criminal settlements and safety violations involving major vaccine manufacturers such as Pfizer, Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, and Sanofi?
Does that history give you any pause when evaluating the integrity of the data those same companies provide to regulators for vaccine approval?
12. I understand that vaccine manufacturers are legally shielded from liability for injury or death under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act.
Given that you are recommending these products for my child, could you clarify:
- Who is legally accountable if an adverse reaction occurs?
- What mechanisms exist for compensation, and how do they work in practice?
- Are you confident enough in their safety data to assume any personal responsibility if harm does occur to my child?
- If not, can you explain the ethical reasoning behind asking me to assume 100% of the risk on behalf of my child, when neither you nor the manufacturer bear any liability?
As always, I’m happy to chat about any of this and give any resources you’d want!
